Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Foreshadow-y line of the week-
Randall, to Kevin: it's all part of parenting a teenager, as you'll see all too soon.
And then they made a point to let us know that Cassidy's kid is 12.
This was actually weird bc we didn’t see any teenage blow ups with Randall’s and Beth’s girls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was shocked to see old Toby in the preview. He looks so much different.
Next week looks so dull as well.
And the next week after Kate is Randall. Haven’t they covered him enough already?
I was actually thinking that we have gotten relatively less of Randall this season. There is a Big 3 trilogy every season, so of course he will have his stand-alone episode.
+1 to the bold above. Those saying it's boring to have the episodes focused on individual Pearson siblings must not have been paying attention -- it's a hallmark of the series to have the trilogies so of course there will be one in the final season. It's three episodes out of, what 20-plus, each season? Not a big deal.
I do wish the showrunners hadn't made a thing of announcing such a firm ending to the run of the show. No, I don't want it to keep going on and on, and it's much better to end a show on your own terms instead of getting canceled. but they don't have much time left to wrap up, in an unrushed way, storylines they've dangled for a long time now. I wonder if we'll end up feeling as if they should have gone just a bit longer in order to have a really good conclusion. We'll see.
What did we learn about Kevin? That’s he’s a good father? We already knew that.
Kate’s episode next week.? Maybe why she and Toby are divorced? Is it that relevant at this point? We know she remarries and Toby is alone.
Anonymous wrote:Foreshadow-y line of the week-
Randall, to Kevin: it's all part of parenting a teenager, as you'll see all too soon.
And then they made a point to let us know that Cassidy's kid is 12.
Anonymous wrote:We haven't had one of these posts since the first two seasons (that I remember) but why they heck did Beth need to take the train from the Pearson's house after Thanksgiving dinner back to CMU?
A. Do they mean the T and then she still needed to get to Oakland?
B. Why didn't she take a cab?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last episode was boring. I want to stick with it as I have been there from the start and want to see how it ends, but I am glad it is the last season.
Agree!
Anonymous wrote:Last episode was boring. I want to stick with it as I have been there from the start and want to see how it ends, but I am glad it is the last season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was shocked to see old Toby in the preview. He looks so much different.
Next week looks so dull as well.
And the next week after Kate is Randall. Haven’t they covered him enough already?
I was actually thinking that we have gotten relatively less of Randall this season. There is a Big 3 trilogy every season, so of course he will have his stand-alone episode.
+1 to the bold above. Those saying it's boring to have the episodes focused on individual Pearson siblings must not have been paying attention -- it's a hallmark of the series to have the trilogies so of course there will be one in the final season. It's three episodes out of, what 20-plus, each season? Not a big deal.
I do wish the showrunners hadn't made a thing of announcing such a firm ending to the run of the show. No, I don't want it to keep going on and on, and it's much better to end a show on your own terms instead of getting canceled. but they don't have much time left to wrap up, in an unrushed way, storylines they've dangled for a long time now. I wonder if we'll end up feeling as if they should have gone just a bit longer in order to have a really good conclusion. We'll see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was shocked to see old Toby in the preview. He looks so much different.
Next week looks so dull as well.
And the next week after Kate is Randall. Haven’t they covered him enough already?
I was actually thinking that we have gotten relatively less of Randall this season. There is a Big 3 trilogy every season, so of course he will have his stand-alone episode.
+1 to the bold above. Those saying it's boring to have the episodes focused on individual Pearson siblings must not have been paying attention -- it's a hallmark of the series to have the trilogies so of course there will be one in the final season. It's three episodes out of, what 20-plus, each season? Not a big deal.
I do wish the showrunners hadn't made a thing of announcing such a firm ending to the run of the show. No, I don't want it to keep going on and on, and it's much better to end a show on your own terms instead of getting canceled. but they don't have much time left to wrap up, in an unrushed way, storylines they've dangled for a long time now. I wonder if we'll end up feeling as if they should have gone just a bit longer in order to have a really good conclusion. We'll see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was shocked to see old Toby in the preview. He looks so much different.
Next week looks so dull as well.
And the next week after Kate is Randall. Haven’t they covered him enough already?
I was actually thinking that we have gotten relatively less of Randall this season. There is a Big 3 trilogy every season, so of course he will have his stand-alone episode.
+1 to the bold above. Those saying it's boring to have the episodes focused on individual Pearson siblings must not have been paying attention -- it's a hallmark of the series to have the trilogies so of course there will be one in the final season. It's three episodes out of, what 20-plus, each season? Not a big deal.
I do wish the showrunners hadn't made a thing of announcing such a firm ending to the run of the show. No, I don't want it to keep going on and on, and it's much better to end a show on your own terms instead of getting canceled. but they don't have much time left to wrap up, in an unrushed way, storylines they've dangled for a long time now. I wonder if we'll end up feeling as if they should have gone just a bit longer in order to have a really good conclusion. We'll see.
Speaking of one in particular, and maybe this was resolved earlier, but why did Jack keep Nicky a secret from his family, knowing full well he was alive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was shocked to see old Toby in the preview. He looks so much different.
Next week looks so dull as well.
And the next week after Kate is Randall. Haven’t they covered him enough already?
I was actually thinking that we have gotten relatively less of Randall this season. There is a Big 3 trilogy every season, so of course he will have his stand-alone episode.
+1 to the bold above. Those saying it's boring to have the episodes focused on individual Pearson siblings must not have been paying attention -- it's a hallmark of the series to have the trilogies so of course there will be one in the final season. It's three episodes out of, what 20-plus, each season? Not a big deal.
I do wish the showrunners hadn't made a thing of announcing such a firm ending to the run of the show. No, I don't want it to keep going on and on, and it's much better to end a show on your own terms instead of getting canceled. but they don't have much time left to wrap up, in an unrushed way, storylines they've dangled for a long time now. I wonder if we'll end up feeling as if they should have gone just a bit longer in order to have a really good conclusion. We'll see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was shocked to see old Toby in the preview. He looks so much different.
Next week looks so dull as well.
And the next week after Kate is Randall. Haven’t they covered him enough already?
I was actually thinking that we have gotten relatively less of Randall this season. There is a Big 3 trilogy every season, so of course he will have his stand-alone episode.
Anonymous wrote:We haven't had one of these posts since the first two seasons (that I remember) but why they heck did Beth need to take the train from the Pearson's house after Thanksgiving dinner back to CMU?
A. Do they mean the T and then she still needed to get to Oakland?
B. Why didn't she take a cab?