Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The “liberal New York Times” did the same thing when Pelosi won the speakership by the same vote as Paul Ryan, but she had “significant defections” while Ryan had “overwhelming support.”

I can’t quite figure out why these terrible right wing journos think they’d be protected if the GOP came back to power. Why do they do the GOP’s bidding in a million tiny, window-shifting ways?

It truly is bizarre. Why does the New York Times play these games? They behave like they want it to be a horse race but then refuse to accept the consequences. They treat so many Republican scandals and weaknesses with kid gloves, they go on blast over the Dem ones, like "Butter Emails" and never learn.

And yes, the right wing WILL go after the New York Times - and already has, for decades... whether Mark Levin (who calls them the "New York Slimes") or going all the way back to Rush Limbaugh et cetera.

There seems to be so much dumb leadership in corporate media these days.

The fact that you think the NY Times is "right wing" is hilarious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The “liberal New York Times” did the same thing when Pelosi won the speakership by the same vote as Paul Ryan, but she had “significant defections” while Ryan had “overwhelming support.”

I can’t quite figure out why these terrible right wing journos think they’d be protected if the GOP came back to power. Why do they do the GOP’s bidding in a million tiny, window-shifting ways?

It truly is bizarre. Why does the New York Times play these games? They behave like they want it to be a horse race but then refuse to accept the consequences. They treat so many Republican scandals and weaknesses with kid gloves, they go on blast over the Dem ones, like "Butter Emails" and never learn.

And yes, the right wing WILL go after the New York Times - and already has, for decades... whether Mark Levin (who calls them the "New York Slimes") or going all the way back to Rush Limbaugh et cetera.

There seems to be so much dumb leadership in corporate media these days.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The “liberal New York Times” did the same thing when Pelosi won the speakership by the same vote as Paul Ryan, but she had “significant defections” while Ryan had “overwhelming support.”

I can’t quite figure out why these terrible right wing journos think they’d be protected if the GOP came back to power. Why do they do the GOP’s bidding in a million tiny, window-shifting ways?

Anonymous wrote:Telling on themselves

Anonymous wrote:

The “liberal New York Times” did the same thing when Pelosi won the speakership by the same vote as Paul Ryan, but she had “significant defections” while Ryan had “overwhelming support.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which outlets do you consider right-wing?
Which outlets do you consider left-wing?

This is no left wing media in this country. Lots of corporate outlets like MSNBC. Those will push “moderate” democrats but nit really left wing or progressives.

MSNBC definitely leans left but they are corporate entity so completely alienating the right doesn't make sense. Most right or left wing extreme media is online not on TV.

It’s not that they push hard Left, it’s that they have been screaming about Trump for 7 years now. EVERY problem is his fault. Day after day. Trump isn’t perfect but his supporters are tired of the lies & exaggerations.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which outlets do you consider right-wing?
Which outlets do you consider left-wing?

This is no left wing media in this country. Lots of corporate outlets like MSNBC. Those will push “moderate” democrats but nit really left wing or progressives.

MSNBC definitely leans left but they are corporate entity so completely alienating the right doesn't make sense. Most right or left wing extreme media is online not on TV.