Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left is getting all excited about one sided emails from a crazy person's herseay.

When dcum finds out about the lefts involvement with Epstein, this thread will die just like all the other get trump ones

I have an offer for you? The "left" will admit that Thiel and Summers (on your list of "the left") are pedos if you agree that Trump is.

Thiel isnt the left, but keep thinking otherwise. Are you really that dumb or just pretend to be?

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what to believe about the files. But my gut tells me there is nothing really there. Why? Because if there was you’d have to believe that Epstein would have blackmailed Trump into a presidential pardon in 2019 when Trump was at the apex of his power. Or, that it would have been leaked during the 2024 campaign.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what to believe about the files. But my gut tells me there is nothing really there. Why? Because if there was you’d have to believe that Epstein would have blackmailed Trump into a presidential pardon in 2019 when Trump was at the apex of his power. Or, that it would have been leaked during the 2024 campaign.

Trump campaigned on it but seems to be working awfully hard twisting arms to make sure it doesn't happen. Aside, based on his history, why would this be hard to be believe? The simplest explanation is usually right.

Trump promised to release them and has not. That speaks volumes. Also look at Bondi’s expression when asked what she had seen of the files. She twisted herself into a pretzel to try to avoid lying under oath.

Look at the about face of MTG, Lauren Boebert, and Nancy Mace…

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left is getting all excited about one sided emails from a crazy person's herseay.

When dcum finds out about the lefts involvement with Epstein, this thread will die just like all the other get trump ones

I have an offer for you? The "left" will admit that Thiel and Summers (on your list of "the left") are pedos if you agree that Trump is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have released three new emails from the estate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein that mention President Trump, raising new questions about the extent of their relationship.
In one 2015 email between Epstein and author Michael Wolff, the pair discuss a potential question from Trump's upcoming CNN interview about Trump and Epstein’s personal ties.
"I think you should let him hang himself," Wolff wrote. "If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt."
The correspondence shared Wednesday is part of 23,000 additional documents the committee is reviewing from the Epstein estate, Oversight Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., said in a statement.
"The more Donald Trump tries to cover-up the Epstein files, the more we uncover," Garcia wrote. "These latest emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the President."”

Makes me even more convinced that Epstein was murdered.

+100. Epstein was definitely murdered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish Trump would go into that marble Lincoln bathroom and open his veins all over the floor.

Now now. Let's not write such things. Trump would never anyway. He's always had delusions of grandeur, and now with dementia, it's much worse. The man knows no shame and believes he is above the law.

Yes I know once upon a time I was a person who couldn’t ever conceive of wishing or writing such things.

That was before I worked as a prosecutor with child victims of sexual assault and through experiencing their trauma vicariously, came to finally deal with my own trauma from being sexually abused as a child.

Now I feel without moral qualm in wishing for the suffering and elimination of men and women who exploit and abuse children in any way for their own twisted pleasure, without a thought for the lifetime of trauma they’re inflicting on those innocent children they see as mere objects.

I’d love to see the crime scene photos of that bloated gasbag extinguished in that ugly marble bathtomb with pools of his own blood all around him.

But yeah, I know how rare it is for malignant narcissists to do the right thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson has said they will vote on it next week. Then, according to the NYTimes, it goes to the Senate - where they need 60 votes. Are there sixty votes?

Then, according to the NYTimes, it goes to the President, who will certainly veto it. Which means, now there needs to be a veto proof majority on both houses.

I just don’t see that it has a chance.

I don’t know, I think that some of the Republicans are seeing the writing of the wall.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what to believe about the files. But my gut tells me there is nothing really there. Why? Because if there was you’d have to believe that Epstein would have blackmailed Trump into a presidential pardon in 2019 when Trump was at the apex of his power. Or, that it would have been leaked during the 2024 campaign.

Trump campaigned on it but seems to be working awfully hard twisting arms to make sure it doesn't happen. Aside, based on his history, why would this be hard to be believe? The simplest explanation is usually right.

Trump promised to release them and has not. That speaks volumes. Also look at Bondi’s expression when asked what she had seen of the files. She twisted herself into a pretzel to try to avoid lying under oath.

Look at the about face of MTG, Lauren Boebert, and Nancy Mace…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think pundits underestimated all of the non-sexual dirt that would come out on Trump (how he is widely viewed as a laughing stock).

I don’t know why. I’ve never lived in New York and even I knew he was a dirtbag by the 90s.

New York Times did a multi page investigative report of his decades of tax fraud in about 2017. His mob style business practices have been common knowledge for decades.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will dcum do when these files show that Trump did NOTHING?

What will DCUM do when the sun doesn’t rise tomorrow? I guess that’s possible as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what to believe about the files. But my gut tells me there is nothing really there. Why? Because if there was you’d have to believe that Epstein would have blackmailed Trump into a presidential pardon in 2019 when Trump was at the apex of his power. Or, that it would have been leaked during the 2024 campaign.

Trump campaigned on it but seems to be working awfully hard twisting arms to make sure it doesn't happen. Aside, based on his history, why would this be hard to be believe? The simplest explanation is usually right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what to believe about the files. But my gut tells me there is nothing really there. Why? Because if there was you’d have to believe that Epstein would have blackmailed Trump into a presidential pardon in 2019 when Trump was at the apex of his power. Or, that it would have been leaked during the 2024 campaign.

You can make up whatever scenarios you’d like to counter the evidence before you, we can’t stop you.

I mean, after Russia collusion hoax and the fake laptop scandals it’s really hard to take anything seriously anymore.

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what to believe about the files. But my gut tells me there is nothing really there. Why? Because if there was you’d have to believe that Epstein would have blackmailed Trump into a presidential pardon in 2019 when Trump was at the apex of his power. Or, that it would have been leaked during the 2024 campaign.