Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
At least the Senate would actually get to VOTE on something now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
PP here. Thank you.
Do you think Manchin will switch parties?
DP. I don’t. If he wanted to he would have done so already.
No way. He has more power staying right where he is. NP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
PP here. Thank you.
Do you think Manchin will switch parties?
DP. I don’t. If he wanted to he would have done so already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Democrats win, Stacey Abrams for everything.
+1000000
+50mil 🇺🇸
+11,780!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
PP here. Thank you.
Do you think Manchin will switch parties?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
PP here. Thank you.
Do you think Manchin will switch parties?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
PP here. Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Ossoff pullsit out as well.
Joe Mancin now becomes one of the most powerful people in America.
How so?
NP. If you’re asking about Manchin, it’s because with a 50-50 split in the Senate (with VP Harris tiebreaking), all 50 Democrats would have to vote together to get to the point of a tiebreaker. Manchin is the most conservative D, so he will be the swing vote without which Democrats can’t get anything through. Similar to Collins/Murkowski now, where if they (plus one other R) break away from the R conference, a bill is probably not passing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Democrats win, Stacey Abrams for everything.
+1000000
+50mil 🇺🇸