Anonymous wrote:Wait…
So what happened to the Durham report?

Anonymous wrote:Clinesmith probably had a hard time believing a wackadoodle like Carter Page had done anything for the CIA. I certainly would have a hard time believing it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He plead guilty today. Sentencing is in December.

Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty Wednesday in federal court to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign.

U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia James Boasberg accepted the plea. Clinesmith's sentencing date has been set for Dec. 10 at 11 a.m. ET.

Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation.

The inspector general accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he was “not a source” for another government agency.

Page has said he was a source for the CIA.

The Justice Department relied on Clinesmith’s assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

During the plea hearing, Boasberg asked Clinesmith to affirm that he "intentionally altered an email, and added language" that "individual number one" was "not a source...and you knew that statement was in fact not true."

Clinesmith replied, "At the time I thought the information I was providing was accurate, but I am agreeing the information I inserted was not originally there, and I inserted the information."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-fbi-lawyer-kevin-clinesmith-pleads-guilty-durham-probe

Life is so much easier when you are a Democrat......

I still say this was a pretty tenuous thing. But that's all that Team Trump was ever able to come up with.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s literally impossible to lose your law license once you’re in the guild. Seriously, you need to do something waaaay more egregious than lying to investigators. Not surprised at all that he will get to keep his license.

And, as a result, people like Clinesmith give lawyers the sleazy reputation so many have of them.
I would think reputable attorneys would be pissed about it.

Nowhere near as sleazy as Giuliani who gave false testimony to various state legislators pushing his hyperbolic rhetoric of the Big Lie election steal. Nowhere near as sleazy as Manafort, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon and all the rest of Trump's circle, many of whom got their lives back via pardons. Nowhere near as sleazy as all of the other things that went on and which continue now with elections after Trump's goons got the ball rolling.

What Clinesmith did was at best irresponsible, sloppy shortcutting to avoid additional bureaucracy but either way it would and should not have altered the outcome of the investigations. Yet the GQP is so invested in a narrative of attacking him because they think that by attacking the single point of failure in the investigation, it somehow negates the entirety of the investigation - but it doesn't.

It was a hell of a lot more than "irresponsible." Carter Page would not agree with your assessment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s literally impossible to lose your law license once you’re in the guild. Seriously, you need to do something waaaay more egregious than lying to investigators. Not surprised at all that he will get to keep his license.

And, as a result, people like Clinesmith give lawyers the sleazy reputation so many have of them.
I would think reputable attorneys would be pissed about it.

Nowhere near as sleazy as Giuliani who gave false testimony to various state legislators pushing his hyperbolic rhetoric of the Big Lie election steal. Nowhere near as sleazy as Manafort, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon and all the rest of Trump's circle, many of whom got their lives back via pardons. Nowhere near as sleazy as all of the other things that went on and which continue now with elections after Trump's goons got the ball rolling.

What Clinesmith did was at best irresponsible, sloppy shortcutting to avoid additional bureaucracy but either way it would and should not have altered the outcome of the investigations. Yet the GQP is so invested in a narrative of attacking him because they think that by attacking the single point of failure in the investigation, it somehow negates the entirety of the investigation - but it doesn't.

It was a hell of a lot more than "irresponsible." Carter Page would not agree with your assessment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s literally impossible to lose your law license once you’re in the guild. Seriously, you need to do something waaaay more egregious than lying to investigators. Not surprised at all that he will get to keep his license.

And, as a result, people like Clinesmith give lawyers the sleazy reputation so many have of them.
I would think reputable attorneys would be pissed about it.

Nowhere near as sleazy as Giuliani who gave false testimony to various state legislators pushing his hyperbolic rhetoric of the Big Lie election steal. Nowhere near as sleazy as Manafort, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon and all the rest of Trump's circle, many of whom got their lives back via pardons. Nowhere near as sleazy as all of the other things that went on and which continue now with elections after Trump's goons got the ball rolling.

What Clinesmith did was at best irresponsible, sloppy shortcutting to avoid additional bureaucracy but either way it would and should not have altered the outcome of the investigations. Yet the GQP is so invested in a narrative of attacking him because they think that by attacking the single point of failure in the investigation, it somehow negates the entirety of the investigation - but it doesn't.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s literally impossible to lose your law license once you’re in the guild. Seriously, you need to do something waaaay more egregious than lying to investigators. Not surprised at all that he will get to keep his license.

And, as a result, people like Clinesmith give lawyers the sleazy reputation so many have of them.
I would think reputable attorneys would be pissed about it.

Anonymous wrote:It’s literally impossible to lose your law license once you’re in the guild. Seriously, you need to do something waaaay more egregious than lying to investigators. Not surprised at all that he will get to keep his license.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He plead guilty today. Sentencing is in December.

Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty Wednesday in federal court to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign.

U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia James Boasberg accepted the plea. Clinesmith's sentencing date has been set for Dec. 10 at 11 a.m. ET.

Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation.

The inspector general accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he was “not a source” for another government agency.

Page has said he was a source for the CIA.

The Justice Department relied on Clinesmith’s assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

During the plea hearing, Boasberg asked Clinesmith to affirm that he "intentionally altered an email, and added language" that "individual number one" was "not a source...and you knew that statement was in fact not true."

Clinesmith replied, "At the time I thought the information I was providing was accurate, but I am agreeing the information I inserted was not originally there, and I inserted the information."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-fbi-lawyer-kevin-clinesmith-pleads-guilty-durham-probe

Life is so much easier when you are a Democrat......

Anonymous wrote:He plead guilty today. Sentencing is in December.

Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty Wednesday in federal court to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign.

U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia James Boasberg accepted the plea. Clinesmith's sentencing date has been set for Dec. 10 at 11 a.m. ET.

Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation.

The inspector general accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he was “not a source” for another government agency.

Page has said he was a source for the CIA.

The Justice Department relied on Clinesmith’s assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

During the plea hearing, Boasberg asked Clinesmith to affirm that he "intentionally altered an email, and added language" that "individual number one" was "not a source...and you knew that statement was in fact not true."

Clinesmith replied, "At the time I thought the information I was providing was accurate, but I am agreeing the information I inserted was not originally there, and I inserted the information."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-fbi-lawyer-kevin-clinesmith-pleads-guilty-durham-probe