Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that if this nonverbal man's behaviour was so egregious, witnesses would've come out by now with various versions of what they saw and there has been NOTHING.
I think a hothead happened to be a cop and happened to have a gun. I can't imagine having that much firearms training and still managing to decide to pull out a firearm in a public place, then to shoot three people, killing one. I will be VERY surprised if this can all be blamed on the nonverbal man.
The ONE detail that gave me pause was that the nonverbal man who was mentally disabled apparently drove a car (this info was from the cousin). Kind of sounds like a possible "Slow Donnie" situation but again, I feel like others would have witnessed such behaviour.
The family has verified that he was a probable schizophrenic. He apparently could drive, cook and at one point had studied Acctg/Finance in college. He also had posted on Facebook.
I'm not sure when he became nonverbal but that seems to have been a fairly recent development.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting follow-up from the L.A. Times. Unlike with most shootings where reader opinions are pretty evenly split, the readers overwhelmingly do not believe the cop’s story.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/readersreact/la-ol-le-costco-shooting-reader-reactions-20190622-story.html
Anonymous wrote:I think that if this nonverbal man's behaviour was so egregious, witnesses would've come out by now with various versions of what they saw and there has been NOTHING.
I think a hothead happened to be a cop and happened to have a gun. I can't imagine having that much firearms training and still managing to decide to pull out a firearm in a public place, then to shoot three people, killing one. I will be VERY surprised if this can all be blamed on the nonverbal man.
The ONE detail that gave me pause was that the nonverbal man who was mentally disabled apparently drove a car (this info was from the cousin). Kind of sounds like a possible "Slow Donnie" situation but again, I feel like others would have witnessed such behaviour.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could the parents be held liable for bringing their unmedicated son into Costco?
He was an adult, so unless he was declared incompetent and his parents given legal custody of him, no, they can’t be held legally responsible. And even if they could, for what? The cop’s ER bill to check his bruise?
This has been a terrible nightmare for those parents, no question. But they used their membership to get their son into Costco and they more than likely did have some sort of guardianship over him if he was mentally incapacitated. I am NOT saying that they should be held liable for bringing him into the store, my question is COULD they be held responsible for bringing him into that store?
Have you never been to Costco? You actually don’t need a membership to enter, just to shop. You can also buy a 1 day pass or a Costco gift card.
Costco is also full of children running around, knocking things over, bumping into people. Can I sue the parents when their child injures me because he or she was allowed into the store on the parents’ membership. I’ve had two Urgent Care visits after dealing with others’ out of control kids in Costco.
To treat your anxiety?
In one incident, a child knocked a huge can of green beans onto my foot. In another, a child scraped my back and side with a cart. I had a bleeding area the size of my palm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could the parents be held liable for bringing their unmedicated son into Costco?
He was an adult, so unless he was declared incompetent and his parents given legal custody of him, no, they can’t be held legally responsible. And even if they could, for what? The cop’s ER bill to check his bruise?
This has been a terrible nightmare for those parents, no question. But they used their membership to get their son into Costco and they more than likely did have some sort of guardianship over him if he was mentally incapacitated. I am NOT saying that they should be held liable for bringing him into the store, my question is COULD they be held responsible for bringing him into that store?
Have you never been to Costco? You actually don’t need a membership to enter, just to shop. You can also buy a 1 day pass or a Costco gift card.
Costco is also full of children running around, knocking things over, bumping into people. Can I sue the parents when their child injures me because he or she was allowed into the store on the parents’ membership. I’ve had two Urgent Care visits after dealing with others’ out of control kids in Costco.
To treat your anxiety?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could the parents be held liable for bringing their unmedicated son into Costco?
He was an adult, so unless he was declared incompetent and his parents given legal custody of him, no, they can’t be held legally responsible. And even if they could, for what? The cop’s ER bill to check his bruise?
This has been a terrible nightmare for those parents, no question. But they used their membership to get their son into Costco and they more than likely did have some sort of guardianship over him if he was mentally incapacitated. I am NOT saying that they should be held liable for bringing him into the store, my question is COULD they be held responsible for bringing him into that store?
Have you never been to Costco? You actually don’t need a membership to enter, just to shop. You can also buy a 1 day pass or a Costco gift card.
Costco is also full of children running around, knocking things over, bumping into people. Can I sue the parents when their child injures me because he or she was allowed into the store on the parents’ membership. I’ve had two Urgent Care visits after dealing with others’ out of control kids in Costco.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could the parents be held liable for bringing their unmedicated son into Costco?
He was an adult, so unless he was declared incompetent and his parents given legal custody of him, no, they can’t be held legally responsible. And even if they could, for what? The cop’s ER bill to check his bruise?
This has been a terrible nightmare for those parents, no question. But they used their membership to get their son into Costco and they more than likely did have some sort of guardianship over him if he was mentally incapacitated. I am NOT saying that they should be held liable for bringing him into the store, my question is COULD they be held responsible for bringing him into that store?
Have you never been to Costco? You actually don’t need a membership to enter, just to shop. You can also buy a 1 day pass or a Costco gift card.
Costco is also full of children running around, knocking things over, bumping into people. Can I sue the parents when their child injures me because he or she was allowed into the store on the parents’ membership. I’ve had two Urgent Care visits after dealing with others’ out of control kids in Costco.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could the parents be held liable for bringing their unmedicated son into Costco?
He was an adult, so unless he was declared incompetent and his parents given legal custody of him, no, they can’t be held legally responsible. And even if they could, for what? The cop’s ER bill to check his bruise?
This has been a terrible nightmare for those parents, no question. But they used their membership to get their son into Costco and they more than likely did have some sort of guardianship over him if he was mentally incapacitated. I am NOT saying that they should be held liable for bringing him into the store, my question is COULD they be held responsible for bringing him into that store?
Have you never been to Costco? You actually don’t need a membership to enter, just to shop. You can also buy a 1 day pass or a Costco gift card.
Costco is also full of children running around, knocking things over, bumping into people. Can I sue the parents when their child injures me because he or she was allowed into the store on the parents’ membership. I’ve had two Urgent Care visits after dealing with others’ out of control kids in Costco.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could the parents be held liable for bringing their unmedicated son into Costco?
He was an adult, so unless he was declared incompetent and his parents given legal custody of him, no, they can’t be held legally responsible. And even if they could, for what? The cop’s ER bill to check his bruise?
This has been a terrible nightmare for those parents, no question. But they used their membership to get their son into Costco and they more than likely did have some sort of guardianship over him if he was mentally incapacitated. I am NOT saying that they should be held liable for bringing him into the store, my question is COULD they be held responsible for bringing him into that store?
Anonymous wrote:Funny how the story became that the baby was slammed to the ground when there is absolutely no evidence that happened.
Anonymous wrote:I apologize if this has already been posted but I wonder how the situation would have unfolded if no one had been armed with a gun?
It is far from hilarious when children have to learn lock down drills because everyone running around in this country has access to guns. Seriously.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny how the story became that the baby was slammed to the ground when there is absolutely no evidence that happened.
Sure. It’s hilarious when children are placed in dangerous situations!