Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are reasons judges give for not signing off ?
Most of the time, it's because they disagree with your disposition. It's a close judgment call. Let's say you want to grant (and you submit your case as a grant) and your judge thinks we need more info (new medical opinion etc) to decide the case, your judge will send the case back to you for a rewrite. So, it's important to learn the way how your judge thinks/what his or her preferences are. Some are more grant friendly, some tend to remand a lot, and some just want denials.
Anonymous wrote:What are reasons judges give for not signing off ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they keep firing people and raising the quota how do they expect to get and keep people who make quota ?
The burnout rate at the Board is high. But, management has no incentive to change working conditions because Congress gives VA and the Board huge amounts of money to constantly hire new attorneys. Because of the huge turnover and burnout rate at the Board, management recently allowed new attorneys to join the Board remotely. This way, the Board has a nationwide applicant pool to churn and burn through. With the quota increasing to 3.5 decisions a week this upcoming fiscal year, I expect the turnover rate to increase dramatically.
Well, they started on-boarding remotely because of the pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they keep firing people and raising the quota how do they expect to get and keep people who make quota ?
The burnout rate at the Board is high. But, management has no incentive to change working conditions because Congress gives VA and the Board huge amounts of money to constantly hire new attorneys. Because of the huge turnover and burnout rate at the Board, management recently allowed new attorneys to join the Board remotely. This way, the Board has a nationwide applicant pool to churn and burn through. With the quota increasing to 3.5 decisions a week this upcoming fiscal year, I expect the turnover rate to increase dramatically.
Anonymous wrote:If they keep firing people and raising the quota how do they expect to get and keep people who make quota ?
Anonymous wrote:If they keep firing people and raising the quota how do they expect to get and keep people who make quota ?
Anonymous wrote:Are attorneys still promoted to GS-14 at the Board automatically? How do step increases work once you hit GS-14?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That survey is from FY 2018, is there a more current one?
No. AFGE 17, which represents VA Central Office employees (including BVA attorneys), was essentially inoperative during the Trump Administration, as Trump heavily restricted union representation time. The union is becoming more active now that Biden has restored full union rights. Hopefully, the union can do something about management's plan to significantly increase the quota in FY2022.
has this plan been expressed publicly by management?
Yes. The Chairman has notified the union that she wants the Board to render 111,500 decisions in the upcoming fiscal year. That's a year over year increase of approximately 20,000 decisions. As the Board has approximately 850 attorneys on staff, attorneys will each be expected to draft an additional 24 decisions in FY2022. The quota for for FY2022 will be even higher than the quota in FY2018.
3.5 a week rather than 3
How does one measure one-half of a decision?
Anonymous wrote:You’re assuming that if you submit seven decisions a **payperiod**, your judge will approve all of them. That’s highly unlikely, particularly for the picky judges. Only decisions that are signed are counted towards the quota. That’s the point I was making.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That survey is from FY 2018, is there a more current one?
No. AFGE 17, which represents VA Central Office employees (including BVA attorneys), was essentially inoperative during the Trump Administration, as Trump heavily restricted union representation time. The union is becoming more active now that Biden has restored full union rights. Hopefully, the union can do something about management's plan to significantly increase the quota in FY2022.
has this plan been expressed publicly by management?
Yes. The Chairman has notified the union that she wants the Board to render 111,500 decisions in the upcoming fiscal year. That's a year over year increase of approximately 20,000 decisions. As the Board has approximately 850 attorneys on staff, attorneys will each be expected to draft an additional 24 decisions in FY2022. The quota for for FY2022 will be even higher than the quota in FY2018.
3.5 a week rather than 3
How does one measure one-half of a decision?
It’s not measured that way. The current quota of 3 signed decisions a week means that the quota is 156 signed decisions a year (3*52=156). Next fiscal year, the quota will increase to 182 signed decisions a year (3.5*52=182). “Signed decisions” means decisions that are approved by your judge. Decisions that you submit, but are not approved, do not count towards your quota. In order to attain 3.5 signed decisions a week, you will need to submit four or five decisions a week.