Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

USSF has no influence over youth soccer since DA folded (except the YNT). This do-whatever-you-want age cutoff is the manifestation of that.

They don't control anything anymore so they can't tell people what to do anymore. USYS , USCS and AYSO were merely giving them a token proposal.

But isn't the argument that USSF created their own private orgs (MLSN/GA) to replace DA, so that's where they show up? And, isn't this is why they left BY/SY to each organization?

US Soccer (USSF) most certainly does control all soccer in America. You only see the youth part of what they do. They allow (grant the right) for entities to sanction (player paperwork) this is what allows leagues to exist. US Soccer also does MLS USL NWSL USWNT USMNT.

What US Soccer did with with BY vs SY is allow leagues to choose what grouping type works best for them. ECNL has made it clear that they prefer SY. Unofficially ECNL worked with US Club (who sanctions ECNL) to "encourage" all leagues US Club sanctions to change to SY. USYS has also announced that they plan to change to SY

What the ECNL hats cant comprehend is that MLS sanctions MLS Next and GA is able to sanction itself. They are both completely different than US Club. There is a really good chance that neither change from BY. For boys MLSN controls who gets to play professionally. For girls GA staying BY might be happening because the plan is to link GA with NWSL the same way MLSN is linked with MLS. ECNL lovers see this possibility and because of it are trying everything they can to make up that GA is switching to SY. When in reality only GA + NWSL + US Soccer leadership know what will happen next.

The reason ECNL went to SY is because that is what college coaches were asking for - they want to see players basically by graduating class (or close to it). And despite boy parents equating NWSL with MLS - there just isn't the market for professionally play on the girls side. NWSL salaries are miniscule compared to MLS, and going to college and getting a degree looks much better financially to lots of girls versus slogging it out to become a pro when the money isn't great. Thus, GA needs to decide what they want to be. If they want to be a path to pros (which is what maybe 1% wants) they stay BY; if they want to be a conduit to college recruiting, they go SY.

Also, this great linkage between GA/MLS/US Soccer leadership that you think is happenign, isn't. The head of US Soccer is also part of NCFC/NC Courage leadership, and they are firmly entrenched in ECNL. If they moved to GA, then you would know something is up in coordination with US Soccer.

You obviously dont understand that MLSN places players on pro teams and on college teams.

This is exactly what would happen with GA if it partnered with NWSL.

Anonymous wrote:Forget the Acadamies Berman wants to create and sell NWSL2 franchises.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/44850805/nwsl-submits-bid-launch-second-division-2026

The National Women's Soccer League has formally applied to the U.S. Soccer Federation to create a new Division II league.

The plan is for the league to launch in 2026 as a developmental tier under the NWSL, which has been a first-division league since its inception in late 2012

A second-division women's professional league must have at least six teams to apply for sanctioning.

All stadiums must seat at least 2,000 people, and principal owners of teams must have a net worth of at least $7.5 million.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-87#post-502542

No changes to age groups for ECNL until Fall 26

The email exchange is a fake. You can tell because the fonts are different between the two messages.

Not only in size, but Thatonedad got close, but not cigar. The lower case “d” shows two different fonts.

It’s fake or you want it to be fake, or both?

Don’t care one way or the other. Prefer SY tbh. But I also abhor BS artists, liars and fakes. Would prefer to have this discussion with facts, opposed to fake emails screenshots, fake “calls from Trish” etc.

The evidence is that one dad is reliable. We will find out in time if he’s BS everyone.

But for now I’m going to assume GA is going SY and ECNL will stay BY for 25/26.

You mean he posted fake emails before, but it turned out to be closish in the sense that something did change, albeit not at all what he said except for SY related. So now you’ll say he is “reliable.” Even tho he is now saying “I’m just passing these along, they’re not even from me, I can’t verify them.”

🤦🏻‍♀️

They posted emails screen shots a month or so before anything was announced that it was being discussed and someone from ECNL said it was most likely going to change.

Other then that all I’ve seen is last few emails which can’t be verified until GA makes a decision publicly and ECNL calendar year finishes with no changes.

🤦‍♂️Stop embarrassing yourself.

We all know you made up the posts on socalforum.

ECNL and GA going SY for 26/27 and no changes for 25/26 seems like a very reasonable take at this point not sure it’s worth dying on the hill to oppose that.

But if you wish to fight until your last breath on the BY hill I respect.

Anonymous wrote:Forget the Acadamies Berman wants to create and sell NWSL2 franchises.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/44850805/nwsl-submits-bid-launch-second-division-2026

The National Women's Soccer League has formally applied to the U.S. Soccer Federation to create a new Division II league.

The plan is for the league to launch in 2026 as a developmental tier under the NWSL, which has been a first-division league since its inception in late 2012

A second-division women's professional league must have at least six teams to apply for sanctioning.

All stadiums must seat at least 2,000 people, and principal owners of teams must have a net worth of at least $7.5 million.

Anonymous wrote:Forget the Acadamies Berman wants to create and sell NWSL2 franchises.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/44850805/nwsl-submits-bid-launch-second-division-2026

The National Women's Soccer League has formally applied to the U.S. Soccer Federation to create a new Division II league.

The plan is for the league to launch in 2026 as a developmental tier under the NWSL, which has been a first-division league since its inception in late 2012

A second-division women's professional league must have at least six teams to apply for sanctioning.

All stadiums must seat at least 2,000 people, and principal owners of teams must have a net worth of at least $7.5 million.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

USSF has no influence over youth soccer since DA folded (except the YNT). This do-whatever-you-want age cutoff is the manifestation of that.

They don't control anything anymore so they can't tell people what to do anymore. USYS , USCS and AYSO were merely giving them a token proposal.

But isn't the argument that USSF created their own private orgs (MLSN/GA) to replace DA, so that's where they show up? And, isn't this is why they left BY/SY to each organization?

US Soccer (USSF) most certainly does control all soccer in America. You only see the youth part of what they do. They allow (grant the right) for entities to sanction (player paperwork) this is what allows leagues to exist. US Soccer also does MLS USL NWSL USWNT USMNT.

What US Soccer did with with BY vs SY is allow leagues to choose what grouping type works best for them. ECNL has made it clear that they prefer SY. Unofficially ECNL worked with US Club (who sanctions ECNL) to "encourage" all leagues US Club sanctions to change to SY. USYS has also announced that they plan to change to SY

What the ECNL hats cant comprehend is that MLS sanctions MLS Next and GA is able to sanction itself. They are both completely different than US Club. There is a really good chance that neither change from BY. For boys MLSN controls who gets to play professionally. For girls GA staying BY might be happening because the plan is to link GA with NWSL the same way MLSN is linked with MLS. ECNL lovers see this possibility and because of it are trying everything they can to make up that GA is switching to SY. When in reality only GA + NWSL + US Soccer leadership know what will happen next.

The reason ECNL went to SY is because that is what college coaches were asking for - they want to see players basically by graduating class (or close to it). And despite boy parents equating NWSL with MLS - there just isn't the market for professionally play on the girls side. NWSL salaries are miniscule compared to MLS, and going to college and getting a degree looks much better financially to lots of girls versus slogging it out to become a pro when the money isn't great. Thus, GA needs to decide what they want to be. If they want to be a path to pros (which is what maybe 1% wants) they stay BY; if they want to be a conduit to college recruiting, they go SY.

Also, this great linkage between GA/MLS/US Soccer leadership that you think is happenign, isn't. The head of US Soccer is also part of NCFC/NC Courage leadership, and they are firmly entrenched in ECNL. If they moved to GA, then you would know something is up in coordination with US Soccer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

USSF has no influence over youth soccer since DA folded (except the YNT). This do-whatever-you-want age cutoff is the manifestation of that.

They don't control anything anymore so they can't tell people what to do anymore. USYS , USCS and AYSO were merely giving them a token proposal.

But isn't the argument that USSF created their own private orgs (MLSN/GA) to replace DA, so that's where they show up? And, isn't this is why they left BY/SY to each organization?

US Soccer (USSF) most certainly does control all soccer in America. You only see the youth part of what they do. They allow (grant the right) for entities to sanction (player paperwork) this is what allows leagues to exist. US Soccer also does MLS USL NWSL USWNT USMNT.

What US Soccer did with with BY vs SY is allow leagues to choose what grouping type works best for them. ECNL has made it clear that they prefer SY. Unofficially ECNL worked with US Club (who sanctions ECNL) to "encourage" all leagues US Club sanctions to change to SY. USYS has also announced that they plan to change to SY

What the ECNL hats cant comprehend is that MLS sanctions MLS Next and GA is able to sanction itself. They are both completely different than US Club. There is a really good chance that neither change from BY. For boys MLSN controls who gets to play professionally. For girls GA staying BY might be happening because the plan is to link GA with NWSL the same way MLSN is linked with MLS. ECNL lovers see this possibility and because of it are trying everything they can to make up that GA is switching to SY. When in reality only GA + NWSL + US Soccer leadership know what will happen next.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

USSF has no influence over youth soccer since DA folded (except the YNT). This do-whatever-you-want age cutoff is the manifestation of that.

They don't control anything anymore so they can't tell people what to do anymore. USYS , USCS and AYSO were merely giving them a token proposal.

But isn't the argument that USSF created their own private orgs (MLSN/GA) to replace DA, so that's where they show up? And, isn't this is why they left BY/SY to each organization?

US Soccer (USSF) most certainly does control all soccer in America. You only see the youth part of what they do. They allow (grant the right) for entities to sanction (player paperwork) this is what allows leagues to exist. US Soccer also does MLS USL NWSL USWNT USMNT.

What US Soccer did with with BY vs SY is allow leagues to choose what grouping type works best for them. ECNL has made it clear that they prefer SY. Unofficially ECNL worked with US Club (who sanctions ECNL) to "encourage" all leagues US Club sanctions to change to SY. USYS has also announced that they plan to change to SY

What the ECNL hats cant comprehend is that MLS sanctions MLS Next and GA is able to sanction itself. They are both completely different than US Club. There is a really good chance that neither change from BY. For boys MLSN controls who gets to play professionally. For girls GA staying BY might be happening becasue the plan is to link GA with NWSL the same way MLSN is linked with MLS. ECNL lovers see this possibility and because of it are trying everything they can to make up that GA is switching to SY. When in reality only GA + NWSL + US Soccer hleadership know what will happen next.

"There is a really good chance that neither change from BY. For boys MLSN controls who gets to play professionally. "P2P dad wishful thinking here

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

USSF has no influence over youth soccer since DA folded (except the YNT). This do-whatever-you-want age cutoff is the manifestation of that.

They don't control anything anymore so they can't tell people what to do anymore. USYS , USCS and AYSO were merely giving them a token proposal.

But isn't the argument that USSF created their own private orgs (MLSN/GA) to replace DA, so that's where they show up? And, isn't this is why they left BY/SY to each organization?

US Soccer (USSF) most certainly does control all soccer in America. You only see the youth part of what they do. They allow (grant the right) for entities to sanction (player paperwork) this is what allows leagues to exist. US Soccer also does MLS USL NWSL USWNT USMNT.

What US Soccer did with with BY vs SY is allow leagues to choose what grouping type works best for them. ECNL has made it clear that they prefer SY. Unofficially ECNL worked with US Club (who sanctions ECNL) to "encourage" all leagues US Club sanctions to change to SY. USYS has also announced that they plan to change to SY

What the ECNL hats cant comprehend is that MLS sanctions MLS Next and GA is able to sanction itself. They are both completely different than US Club. There is a really good chance that neither change from BY. For boys MLSN controls who gets to play professionally. For girls GA staying BY might be happening becasue the plan is to link GA with NWSL the same way MLSN is linked with MLS. ECNL lovers see this possibility and because of it are trying everything they can to make up that GA is switching to SY. When in reality only GA + NWSL + US Soccer hleadership know what will happen next.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

Wait…now we want facts…but if it’s someone else on a topic you align with, then we don’t want fact?

This thread is nuts

You should see the "original" thread!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

USSF has no influence over youth soccer since DA folded (except the YNT). This do-whatever-you-want age cutoff is the manifestation of that.

They don't control anything anymore so they can't tell people what to do anymore. USYS , USCS and AYSO were merely giving them a token proposal.

But isn't the argument that USSF created their own private orgs (MLSN/GA) to replace DA, so that's where they show up? And, isn't this is why they left BY/SY to each organization?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

Wait…now we want facts…but if it’s someone else on a topic you align with, then we don’t want fact?

This thread is nuts

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How valid is the rumor that ECNL is allowing 4 trapped players to move to their SY teams in January 2026? It would be great to revisit where that came from

Well as of now ECNL has no plans of changing anything. So I would assume that was made up.

Only saving grace would be if US soccer decides to allow an early change. Which would be something they would discuss this fall during their meetings similarly to when they discussed the age group change at all.

USSF has no influence over youth soccer since DA folded (except the YNT). This do-whatever-you-want age cutoff is the manifestation of that.

They don't control anything anymore so they can't tell people what to do anymore. USYS , USCS and AYSO were merely giving them a token proposal.