Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I think Vence is even better looking than Obama was when he was young.

If you all are doing some weird bit trying to make Republicans look weird with this, it’s working.

Yeah the creepy incel trolls boosting Vance on this thread are only making Republicans sound fake and desperate. It's not very believable and over the top!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eww Vance is so slimy.

Vance is hot.

u

Totally agree. JD has intense, deep blue eyes.

I was just thinking how handsome he is. He is a better looking much polished version of Trump. And he seems really smart. I admit I only heard him talk about childless cat lady and dog and cat sound bites.

Are these Russian bots LOL.

I’m not a bot. I just didn’t know anything about Vance or walz. Before today’s debate, I liked walz. I still like walz. Vance is just way better than I expected him to be and he is definitely handsome.

Anonymous wrote:Vance is winning this debate. Walz, by his own admission, is not a strong debator. Vance is coming off as cool and knowledgeable, Walz seems anxious and uncertain.

Vance is still evil.

Yes, I agree.

THANKFULLY, no VP debate has ever moved the needle.

Vance is a liar. No wonder Walz seemed flustered when Vance brought up the Minnesota abortion law--what Vance said had no basis in reality.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/10/01/us/walz-vance-vp-debate#iran-which-launched-this-attack-has-received-over-100-billion-in-unfrozen-assets-thanks-to-the-kamala-harris-administration-what
“The statute you signed into law, it says that a doctor who presides over an abortion where the baby survives — the doctor is under no obligation to provide life-saving care to a baby who survives a botched late-term abortion.”
— Senator JD Vance

This is false.
Mr. Vance is distorting Mr. Walz’s repeal of a so-called born alive law that had been in effect in Minnesota since the 1970s. That law required doctors to report when a “live child” was “born as the result of an abortion,” and to provide “all reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice” to care for that infant.

Anonymous wrote:Vance is winning this debate. Walz, by his own admission, is not a strong debator. Vance is coming off as cool and knowledgeable, Walz seems anxious and uncertain.

Vance is still evil.

He’s an accomplished liar.

Anonymous wrote:Trump seems like a narcissistic buffoon.

But Vance comes across as the villain in Rosemary's Baby. Like the Devil who wants to drink your blood and have you raise his baby.

You sound far weirder than Vance could ever be.

If I had never seen or heard Trump in my life, I'd be pretty darn impressed with Vance's case.

When did walz son witness gun violence at a game? Anyone know the facts?

lol when he says Harris should use the office she has to fix problem…. The VP can’t fix shi$t. All they can do is break a tie in the senate.

What federal lands are we not using? That sounds fake.

Where are all these illegal aliens buying houses

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shocked at how well vance is doing!!!

He is so much better than Trump, I wish he ran for president. We need someone young, handsome, educated, like Kennedy.

Are you seriously comparing Vance to JFK?!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shocked at how well vance is doing!!!

He is so much better than Trump, I wish he ran for president. We need someone young, handsome, educated, like Kennedy.

I honestly can’t tell if people are being paid or if you’re just high.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance will bs throughout.
Walk will be talking plain language making connections to middle class and he will provably be laughing at the ridiculous things that'll come out of Vance.

Seems like the opposite is happening.
Vance is very smooth.
Waltz is nervous and stumbling.

I agree

The stammering is very concerning. Even with help from his ear piece.

I am a little bit disappointed. Walz usually presents himself so much better in public speaking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance will bs throughout.
Walk will be talking plain language making connections to middle class and he will provably be laughing at the ridiculous things that'll come out of Vance.

Seems like the opposite is happening.
Vance is very smooth.
Waltz is nervous and stumbling.

I agree

The stammering is very concerning. Even with help from his ear piece.

He seems like someone that genuinely cares. I don’t mind the emotional component to his responses. He’s answering honestly and thoroughly.

Vance is winning this debate. Walz, by his own admission, is not a strong debator. Vance is coming off as cool and knowledgeable, Walz seems anxious and uncertain.

Vance is still evil.