Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the majority of students pick a school because it has a football team.
It is a nice feature, but I doubt that one kid was swayed to go to Stanford because they play P5 football (except for the recruited football players).
Likewise, BU dropped football, that hasn't hurt the school. NYU doesn't play it. Northeastern doesn't play it.
A school like Georgetown does quite fine with a low-level, academic football team. Same for Villanova.
Of course, VT has an incredible football culture, but that isn't why students go there.
Mine picked ND for football. It’s the whole experience and traditions. He didn’t even consider ivies because of the lack of football. He was very high stats too.
Does he play?
I do think many Southern kids choose schools based on their favorite college football team. Girls with sororities that require bleached hair and weight checks.
Yeah, all the essential choices when deciding where to get your education.
Anonymous wrote:I don't ever want to hear "UVA booster" again... NEU boosters are next level. It's like if you put SLAC, Tulane, and Georgetown boosters together and created a super booster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is schools like Vandy, BC, Wake, etc. don't play "big time" football if big time is defined as playing in big games
As you've basically conceded, "big time" has no objective meaning.
Sure, some people use your definition, but I could just as easily say that being in FBS already makes a Vandy, BC, and Wake "big time" compared to FCS, D2, and D3 college football. Plus they play the FBS royalty teams each year, even if usually the recipient of a beat-down. And these schools have all made multiple bowl games in the past decade. WF played in a bowl game each year in the 2016 to 2022 seasons.
Anonymous wrote:Kids pick schools for all kinds of reasons other than academics, because, well, their brains aren't fully developed. One of mine only looked at D1 sports schools (that kid was a National Merit Scholar and had a 36 on ACT). One only wanted New England LACs because they imagined Dead Poets Society or something.
Guess what, both kids are healthy young adults, employed and making their way in this world. There is no reason to pick on another student's choice, there is a right college for everyone
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the majority of students pick a school because it has a football team.
It is a nice feature, but I doubt that one kid was swayed to go to Stanford because they play P5 football (except for the recruited football players).
Likewise, BU dropped football, that hasn't hurt the school. NYU doesn't play it. Northeastern doesn't play it.
A school like Georgetown does quite fine with a low-level, academic football team. Same for Villanova.
Of course, VT has an incredible football culture, but that isn't why students go there.
Mine picked ND for football. It’s the whole experience and traditions. He didn’t even consider ivies because of the lack of football. He was very high stats too.
Does he play?
I do think many Southern kids choose schools based on their favorite college football team. Girls with sororities that require bleached hair and weight checks.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is schools like Vandy, BC, Wake, etc. don't play "big time" football if big time is defined as playing in big games
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the majority of students pick a school because it has a football team.
It is a nice feature, but I doubt that one kid was swayed to go to Stanford because they play P5 football (except for the recruited football players).
Likewise, BU dropped football, that hasn't hurt the school. NYU doesn't play it. Northeastern doesn't play it.
A school like Georgetown does quite fine with a low-level, academic football team. Same for Villanova.
Of course, VT has an incredible football culture, but that isn't why students go there.
You’re stuck in the Northeast bubble, which doesn’t appreciate college football like the rest of the country.
Even if kids don’t pick a school because of their particular football team, a LOT if students across the country want bigtime football as a part of their college experience.
They see schools like Northwestern, Duke, Vandy, Stanford, ND, Michigan, UVA, Wake , BC very differently than they see no-football schools like Emory, Tufts, BU, NYU, Hopkins.
Between these two extremes are Ivies, Georgetown, Chicago, MIT etc which have “football,” but it’s nothing to get excited about.
Anonymous wrote:Even if kids don’t pick a school because of their particular football team, a LOT if students across the country want bigtime football as a part of their college experience.
They see schools like Northwestern, Duke, Vandy, Stanford, ND, Michigan, UVA, Wake , BC very differently than they see no-football schools like Emory, Tufts, BU, NYU, Hopkins.
Between these two extremes are Ivies, Georgetown, Chicago, MIT etc which have “football,” but it’s nothing to get excited about.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the majority of students pick a school because it has a football team.
It is a nice feature, but I doubt that one kid was swayed to go to Stanford because they play P5 football (except for the recruited football players).
Likewise, BU dropped football, that hasn't hurt the school. NYU doesn't play it. Northeastern doesn't play it.
A school like Georgetown does quite fine with a low-level, academic football team. Same for Villanova.
Of course, VT has an incredible football culture, but that isn't why students go there.
Anonymous wrote:All of the objective rankings these days and elite tech firm recruiters rank NEU in the top 5 for both CS and engineering, why are people upset that it's just a fact most students pick NEU over schools like Cornell, Chicago, and Harvard for tech?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the majority of students pick a school because it has a football team.
It is a nice feature, but I doubt that one kid was swayed to go to Stanford because they play P5 football (except for the recruited football players).
Likewise, BU dropped football, that hasn't hurt the school. NYU doesn't play it. Northeastern doesn't play it.
A school like Georgetown does quite fine with a low-level, academic football team. Same for Villanova.
Of course, VT has an incredible football culture, but that isn't why students go there.
Mine picked ND for football. It’s the whole experience and traditions. He didn’t even consider ivies because of the lack of football. He was very high stats too.
Does he play?
I do think many Southern kids choose schools based on their favorite college football team. Girls with sororities that require bleached hair and weight checks.
Anonymous wrote:All of the objective rankings these days and elite tech firm recruiters rank NEU in the top 5 for both CS and engineering, why are people upset that it's just a fact most students pick NEU over schools like Cornell, Chicago, and Harvard for tech?