Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like Joe Jonas's people are posting here

Same

Anonymous wrote:I feel like Joe Jonas's people are posting here

Anonymous wrote:I feel like Joe Jonas's people are posting here

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know much about either of these two, I know Joe Jonas as part of the Jonas Brothers. I didn’t know his wife was on GOT (No, didn’t watch it). So I read up a little.

Here’s my impression.

They didn’t seem to publicize their kids, even withheld their names from the public for awhile.

Joe Jonas is pap’d carrying the kids cause Joe’s on tour. Public impression: “What a great dad to take so much care of their kids while mom is off working. She’s not a great mom.” I have no idea why most think so much more of a father taking care oh his kids more than a mother taking care of her kids. IMO, he never looked happy carrying the kids.

This whole story line of him taking care of the kids was all him and his PR team to make Sophie look bad. Pictures were a pap stroll and worked, at least in the beginning. Shame on him and his team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she was embarrassed at all the talk of her partying and this stunt is damage control. Joe Jonas is not flakey and even his statement was calm and reasonable. The kids are American citizens and have never lived abroad so this idea of homeland feels like a stunt. He also said the kids can go back and forth but her attempt to have this adjudicated abroad is lame. He is going to be super careful after what Kelly Rutherford has experienced when her kids got shipped abroad. Hopefully they can work this out. Sad to see this kind of drama.

The kids are also UK citizens and dad decided to divorce mom who lives in the UK. It’s reasonable for her to want a UK court to decide custody considering they own a home there and intended to settle there long term. He’s a monster trying to steal kids don’t their mother

The kids have never lived in UK . The kids were born in USA and their passports are USA. If they were British she could have gotten another passport but she cannot. This is all a stunt. Interesting that she was seen having lunch with him and the kids which backs up his surprise that she suddenly went scorched earth.

You sound delusional. The kids have dual citizenships and spent more time in the UK over the last six months than anywhere else.

+1, I also think the older child has spent considerable time there even before 2023.

Also they are dual citizens and likely have both US and UK passports, but when dual citizens travel in and out of the US, they must present a US passport. So if Joe has kids passports, he likely has both US and UK, because he was the one who traveled out of the US with them over the summer.

Regarding Joe being surprised about her filing, I find that sort of ridiculous because he literally wore his wedding ring prominently displayed on a Jumbotron at a concert Sophie was at in early September, and then served her with divorce papers like two days later. It's weird for Joe to claim he's been blindsided by her legal filing when it was filed in response to HIS legal filing. Did he think he just wouldn't respond, or would just politely acquiesce to his unilateral decision to move the kids to the US despite months of planning to settle in the UK? Come on.

I agree with you, but I also think that we are talking about a 4 year old and 14 month old here. I think the place they were most recently physically located as well as where the family owned or had a home rental should come into play - and that's the UK. Seems like they've bounced all around over the past few years. If Joe was intent on raising them in the US then he wouldn't have sold the FL house and made a move to the UK. They are both wealthy. It's not hard to own a home you consider the family home. They didn't have that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she was embarrassed at all the talk of her partying and this stunt is damage control. Joe Jonas is not flakey and even his statement was calm and reasonable. The kids are American citizens and have never lived abroad so this idea of homeland feels like a stunt. He also said the kids can go back and forth but her attempt to have this adjudicated abroad is lame. He is going to be super careful after what Kelly Rutherford has experienced when her kids got shipped abroad. Hopefully they can work this out. Sad to see this kind of drama.

The kids are also UK citizens and dad decided to divorce mom who lives in the UK. It’s reasonable for her to want a UK court to decide custody considering they own a home there and intended to settle there long term. He’s a monster trying to steal kids don’t their mother

The kids have never lived in UK . The kids were born in USA and their passports are USA. If they were British she could have gotten another passport but she cannot. This is all a stunt. Interesting that she was seen having lunch with him and the kids which backs up his surprise that she suddenly went scorched earth.

You sound delusional. The kids have dual citizenships and spent more time in the UK over the last six months than anywhere else.

+1, I also think the older child has spent considerable time there even before 2023.

Also they are dual citizens and likely have both US and UK passports, but when dual citizens travel in and out of the US, they must present a US passport. So if Joe has kids passports, he likely has both US and UK, because he was the one who traveled out of the US with them over the summer.

Regarding Joe being surprised about her filing, I find that sort of ridiculous because he literally wore his wedding ring prominently displayed on a Jumbotron at a concert Sophie was at in early September, and then served her with divorce papers like two days later. It's weird for Joe to claim he's been blindsided by her legal filing when it was filed in response to HIS legal filing. Did he think he just wouldn't respond, or would just politely acquiesce to his unilateral decision to move the kids to the US despite months of planning to settle in the UK? Come on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joe's decision to file for divorce while in the US, where none of them currently have a home, is forcing the entire family to live out of suitcases in hotels until they can sort something out. It was a selfish choice to file for divorce so suddenly, while he had custody of the kids, and while Sophie was merely in the US for a short period before a work commitment later this month.

If Joe is really fine with the kids being raised in both the UK and the US, then there's no reason that Sophie shouldn't be allowed to take them to their current home, in the UK. Especially as that was original plan, and the girls have been with their dad for the last month. Joe could have waited to discuss it wit Sophie before filing, and they could have made these arrangements in advance.

This is all very much Joe's doing. Sophie didn't even have divorce counsel a week ago. She is seeking to protect her rights and not get forced into staying in the US, indefinitely, if she wants to be with her children, when she has a home and a support system in the UK.

There is a concern as Sophie may not let them leave the UK again. She seems to say they should only be raised in the UK from now on and doesn’t speak to any sharing with Joe. It makes sense he gets a temporary order in place before the girls are taken out of the country.

This 100%

Did you even read the filing?

There is zero evidence that Sophie has any intention to withhold custodial time and obviously custodial time will include time with Jonas wherever he’s settled or is touring.

Jonas is the only one withholding the children from travel and custodial time with mom as intended and planned by both. Jonas is the only one the court has evidence proving propensity to game and manipulate both mom and system.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joe's decision to file for divorce while in the US, where none of them currently have a home, is forcing the entire family to live out of suitcases in hotels until they can sort something out. It was a selfish choice to file for divorce so suddenly, while he had custody of the kids, and while Sophie was merely in the US for a short period before a work commitment later this month.

If Joe is really fine with the kids being raised in both the UK and the US, then there's no reason that Sophie shouldn't be allowed to take them to their current home, in the UK. Especially as that was original plan, and the girls have been with their dad for the last month. Joe could have waited to discuss it wit Sophie before filing, and they could have made these arrangements in advance.

This is all very much Joe's doing. Sophie didn't even have divorce counsel a week ago. She is seeking to protect her rights and not get forced into staying in the US, indefinitely, if she wants to be with her children, when she has a home and a support system in the UK.

There is a concern as Sophie may not let them leave the UK again. She seems to say they should only be raised in the UK from now on and doesn’t speak to any sharing with Joe. It makes sense he gets a temporary order in place before the girls are taken out of the country.

This 100%

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joe's decision to file for divorce while in the US, where none of them currently have a home, is forcing the entire family to live out of suitcases in hotels until they can sort something out. It was a selfish choice to file for divorce so suddenly, while he had custody of the kids, and while Sophie was merely in the US for a short period before a work commitment later this month.

If Joe is really fine with the kids being raised in both the UK and the US, then there's no reason that Sophie shouldn't be allowed to take them to their current home, in the UK. Especially as that was original plan, and the girls have been with their dad for the last month. Joe could have waited to discuss it wit Sophie before filing, and they could have made these arrangements in advance.

This is all very much Joe's doing. Sophie didn't even have divorce counsel a week ago. She is seeking to protect her rights and not get forced into staying in the US, indefinitely, if she wants to be with her children, when she has a home and a support system in the UK.

There is a concern as Sophie may not let them leave the UK again. She seems to say they should only be raised in the UK from now on and doesn’t speak to any sharing with Joe. It makes sense he gets a temporary order in place before the girls are taken out of the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is nothing in any of the filings that Joes intent was to keep the kids in the USA as a primary parent and not let them spend time with her in England. Right now they are in the midst of getting a proper custody order in place which is why for a temporary period they can’t leave. She is the one filing saying she would keep the kids in the UK.

There is a lot of legal wrangling happening right now. It is a little strange to go for dinner all together the night before you file a suit saying he abducted the kids. I really don’t think this is what The Hague Convention related to child abduction was meant for.

It's pretty much exactly what it's for. It was intended to help restore/resolve child custody disputes where parents are citizens of different countries and one parent takes the kids from one country to another against an agreed upon custody arrangement.

Think about it from her perspective. When Joe and the girls left the UK, she was under the impression they would be spending a few weeks traveling around the US on tour with his band, and then reuniting withe her in NY before returning to their rental home in the UK and continuing to prepare to move into the home they purchased in Dec. Then, in the middle of that trip, Sophie and Joe have a fight, he files for divorce, and suddenly a court in Florida, where neither of them even lives, is telling her that she can't take her kids back to what she considers their familial home. Think about how you would feel if your spouse filed for divorce when you were separated for work reasons and the kids were with him, and then you found out if you wanted to be with your kids, you needed to stay in a hotel in NY because you can't go home.

People who think she's being overly aggressive should ask themselves what they do in the exact same situation. Because personally, I'd do what Sophie is doing -- find a lawyer who is an expert in international divorce involving child custody, and follow his advice. Yes "child abduction" sounds really serious, but the way Joe chose to go about it falls within the definition under The Hague Conventions. If he didn't want it to escalate like this, perhaps he should have considered waiting until he and Sophie were in the same place with equal access to their kids before discussing it with her and figuring out how best to dissolve their marriage while taking care of their kids. He set all this in motion by acting very rashly and filing in such a way as to put Sophie in an impossible situation.

Anonymous wrote:Well……there’s at least one reason Ryan gosling married Eva me des and not rachelmcadams. Eva stayed home w their kids and basically stopped acting while he got to keep going and also have a sweet family at home. Two stars with amazing careers probably don’t equal well adjusted kids.[/quote]

Your comment is so ridiculous and not based in reality whatsoever.
Ryan & Rachel only dated for 2 years, and in that time they only saw each other every couple of months -- plus, they were super young when they started dating, right after they finished filming The Notebook.
The reason they broke up is because they never saw each other... so what makes you think that marriage had come across either of their minds in their early twenties, and in a relationship where they saw each other probably 6- 8 times over two years? lol