Anonymous
Post 09/14/2023 10:01     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No labels does not even take positions on important issues. No substance is a better name.

This is accurate. I am the one who posted the link to their “policy” page. There’s nothing there. Words but no meaning and also no stance. There are big issues today and if a “party” (GOP cheating plank version infinity) can’t define what they think, they’re not worthy. They’re just trying to peel votes off the Democratic Party.


Exactly. Just call yourselves No Biden, Yes Trump.
Anonymous
Post 09/14/2023 09:57     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE


Wont' happen. A third party would need to start with grassroots for things like school boards and county commissioners and grow from there. Without billionaire funding it, it cannot happen. Why would we just want another billionaire funded party?
Anonymous
Post 09/14/2023 09:12     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:No labels does not even take positions on important issues. No substance is a better name.

This is accurate. I am the one who posted the link to their “policy” page. There’s nothing there. Words but no meaning and also no stance. There are big issues today and if a “party” (GOP cheating plank version infinity) can’t define what they think, they’re not worthy. They’re just trying to peel votes off the Democratic Party.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 20:30     Subject: "No Labels" Party
We need an anybody but Biden or Trump party.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 19:41     Subject: "No Labels" Party
No labels does not even take positions on important issues. No substance is a better name.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 19:38     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE

The strongest argument that No Labels is only in this to elect Trump is that it’s full of Republican donors.


Yeah right because Hogan Manchin and Romney along with Lieberman are such huge Trump supporters. I wish there were 5 or 6 different political parties.

They’re not the donors.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 19:33     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE

The strongest argument that No Labels is only in this to elect Trump is that it’s full of Republican donors.


Yeah right because Hogan Manchin and Romney along with Lieberman are such huge Trump supporters. I wish there were 5 or 6 different political parties.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 16:34     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Adding the link to the much longer Atlantic excerpt from Romney’s biography. He talked seriously with Manchin about actually forming a new political party, not just running a candidate in 2024.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/11/mitt-romney-retiring-senate-trump-mcconnell/675306/

I still wouldn’t support them, but if they started from the ground up like a party ought to, I wouldn’t call them spoilers.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 16:34     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE

The strongest argument that No Labels is only in this to elect Trump is that it’s full of Republican donors.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 16:33     Subject: "No Labels" Party
The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 16:11     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:


Adding the link to the much longer Atlantic excerpt from Romney’s biography. He talked seriously with Manchin about actually forming a new political party, not just running a candidate in 2024.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/11/mitt-romney-retiring-senate-trump-mcconnell/675306/
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 15:21     Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 14:39     Subject: Re:"No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More RFK Jr. cringe...



Just watch: “No Labels” will recruit RFK Jr after he loses the Dem nomination to Biden and decides to go on a rampage.


I doubt it? They dont seem like they're trying to be crazy. Craven, yes - crazy, no.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 14:31     Subject: Re:"No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:More RFK Jr. cringe...



Just watch: “No Labels” will recruit RFK Jr after he loses the Dem nomination to Biden and decides to go on a rampage.
Anonymous
Post 09/13/2023 14:06     Subject: Re:"No Labels" Party
More RFK Jr. cringe...