Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All right something popped into my head after this line of questioning about the 23rd. When this first happened we had some people on here saying something about Brendan’s birthday (which I guess it was, I just looked that up in the court records) and they (or someone they knew?) had stopped by or dropped off a present. Had a drink? I don’t remember exactly but it was implied that other people had been in the house on the evening or night of the 23rd.

So during that line of questioning I thought this might come up but obviously Juliana didn’t bring that up (granted she could have not been part of this interaction between BB and the other person). And the defense didn’t specifically ask either. I don’t have any specific theories on that, I just found it interesting.

Just curious if anyone else remembers this. It seems kinda weird to not acknowledge it was Brendan’s birthday or someone stopped by. So maybe defense will bring that up later. I guess it could later be used to show that Brendan was not “working on the plan” or with the laptop as much that night as Juliana implied.

(Obviously I believe BB was part of every facet of this incomprehensibly evil plan. And killed Christine)

I remember a “neighbor” saying that they went to Brendan‘s house on his birthday to wish him a happy birthday or whatever and then Brendan showed his new phone that he got for his birthday.

This is true, his bday was the night before (thurs). He specifically mentioned his new phone and that he went to the store to get the JUST the contacts transferred over. I remember saying something like "just use iCloud, Android is lame". Also being confused why he didn't transfer over all the photos and message history. But I didn't really care at the time. I didn't see Christine, but the weird thing was that he asked if I wanted to wait until she got back from work. He's never really done that before. I hung back for a few mins, but left without seeing her, I really was just planning to pop in quickly. I had gone to the gym and on the way back just randomly picked up a 6-pack of cookies. I figured it'd be a nice thing since I knew it was his bday.

Also the atmosphere felt a little weird when I walked in, He, Juliana, and the kid where in the kitchen. It was festive, but when I walked in, the whole mood kinda changed. Juliana disappeared upstairs.

Also 1 week after the murder, when they were in the hotel, when the house was still closed as a crime scene. He tried to convince me that he didn't know how many shots were fired. That's when I knew something was off, i knew he was lying. He's not the type to forget any details. He's a very detail oriented person and he doesn't take any random actions, he plans things and is very good at follow through.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. I guess the timeline that was more in question as far as the planning would have been after Christine got home. Because they needed her laptop. Still seems kind of weird that no one brought up that it was Brendan’s birthday. But maybe the defense doesn’t really want that to come up either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All right something popped into my head after this line of questioning about the 23rd. When this first happened we had some people on here saying something about Brendan’s birthday (which I guess it was, I just looked that up in the court records) and they (or someone they knew?) had stopped by or dropped off a present. Had a drink? I don’t remember exactly but it was implied that other people had been in the house on the evening or night of the 23rd.

So during that line of questioning I thought this might come up but obviously Juliana didn’t bring that up (granted she could have not been part of this interaction between BB and the other person). And the defense didn’t specifically ask either. I don’t have any specific theories on that, I just found it interesting.

Just curious if anyone else remembers this. It seems kinda weird to not acknowledge it was Brendan’s birthday or someone stopped by. So maybe defense will bring that up later. I guess it could later be used to show that Brendan was not “working on the plan” or with the laptop as much that night as Juliana implied.

(Obviously I believe BB was part of every facet of this incomprehensibly evil plan. And killed Christine)

I remember a “neighbor” saying that they went to Brendan‘s house on his birthday to wish him a happy birthday or whatever and then Brendan showed his new phone that he got for his birthday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

So great that some of you are posting here about the trial. Can you please give us more context when you post. What is in this telegram conversation? What was the issue with how his body was found? Thanks

I did if you keep reading the thread. You can also click on the link and read it for yourself. It’s sexually violent and graphic. Not going to paste it here!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

So great that some of you are posting here about the trial. Can you please give us more context when you post. What is in this telegram conversation? What was the issue with how his body was found? Thanks

Anonymous wrote:All right something popped into my head after this line of questioning about the 23rd. When this first happened we had some people on here saying something about Brendan’s birthday (which I guess it was, I just looked that up in the court records) and they (or someone they knew?) had stopped by or dropped off a present. Had a drink? I don’t remember exactly but it was implied that other people had been in the house on the evening or night of the 23rd.

So during that line of questioning I thought this might come up but obviously Juliana didn’t bring that up (granted she could have not been part of this interaction between BB and the other person). And the defense didn’t specifically ask either. I don’t have any specific theories on that, I just found it interesting.

Just curious if anyone else remembers this. It seems kinda weird to not acknowledge it was Brendan’s birthday or someone stopped by. So maybe defense will bring that up later. I guess it could later be used to show that Brendan was not “working on the plan” or with the laptop as much that night as Juliana implied.

(Obviously I believe BB was part of every facet of this incomprehensibly evil plan. And killed Christine)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.

Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.

she appears to have a below average IQ to me. She isn't even smart enough to lie about things that are harmful to her future. I have no idea why someone would thing she was a genius lol

She’s gorgeous

Like a female pitbull

Anonymous wrote:All right something popped into my head after this line of questioning about the 23rd. When this first happened we had some people on here saying something about Brendan’s birthday (which I guess it was, I just looked that up in the court records) and they (or someone they knew?) had stopped by or dropped off a present. Had a drink? I don’t remember exactly but it was implied that other people had been in the house on the evening or night of the 23rd.

So during that line of questioning I thought this might come up but obviously Juliana didn’t bring that up (granted she could have not been part of this interaction between BB and the other person). And the defense didn’t specifically ask either. I don’t have any specific theories on that, I just found it interesting.

Just curious if anyone else remembers this. It seems kinda weird to not acknowledge it was Brendan’s birthday or someone stopped by. So maybe defense will bring that up later. I guess it could later be used to show that Brendan was not “working on the plan” or with the laptop as much that night as Juliana implied.

(Obviously I believe BB was part of every facet of this incomprehensibly evil plan. And killed Christine)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

So great that some of you are posting here about the trial. Can you please give us more context when you post. What is in this telegram conversation? What was the issue with how his body was found? Thanks