Anonymous wrote:Interesting. I guess the timeline that was more in question as far as the planning would have been after Christine got home. Because they needed her laptop. Still seems kind of weird that no one brought up that it was Brendan’s birthday. But maybe the defense doesn’t really want that to come up either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All right something popped into my head after this line of questioning about the 23rd. When this first happened we had some people on here saying something about Brendan’s birthday (which I guess it was, I just looked that up in the court records) and they (or someone they knew?) had stopped by or dropped off a present. Had a drink? I don’t remember exactly but it was implied that other people had been in the house on the evening or night of the 23rd.
So during that line of questioning I thought this might come up but obviously Juliana didn’t bring that up (granted she could have not been part of this interaction between BB and the other person). And the defense didn’t specifically ask either. I don’t have any specific theories on that, I just found it interesting.
Just curious if anyone else remembers this. It seems kinda weird to not acknowledge it was Brendan’s birthday or someone stopped by. So maybe defense will bring that up later. I guess it could later be used to show that Brendan was not “working on the plan” or with the laptop as much that night as Juliana implied.
(Obviously I believe BB was part of every facet of this incomprehensibly evil plan. And killed Christine)
I remember a “neighbor” saying that they went to Brendan‘s house on his birthday to wish him a happy birthday or whatever and then Brendan showed his new phone that he got for his birthday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
So great that some of you are posting here about the trial. Can you please give us more context when you post. What is in this telegram conversation? What was the issue with how his body was found? Thanks
I did if you keep reading the thread. You can also click on the link and read it for yourself. It’s sexually violent and graphic. Not going to paste it here!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
So great that some of you are posting here about the trial. Can you please give us more context when you post. What is in this telegram conversation? What was the issue with how his body was found? Thanks
Anonymous wrote:All right something popped into my head after this line of questioning about the 23rd. When this first happened we had some people on here saying something about Brendan’s birthday (which I guess it was, I just looked that up in the court records) and they (or someone they knew?) had stopped by or dropped off a present. Had a drink? I don’t remember exactly but it was implied that other people had been in the house on the evening or night of the 23rd.
So during that line of questioning I thought this might come up but obviously Juliana didn’t bring that up (granted she could have not been part of this interaction between BB and the other person). And the defense didn’t specifically ask either. I don’t have any specific theories on that, I just found it interesting.
Just curious if anyone else remembers this. It seems kinda weird to not acknowledge it was Brendan’s birthday or someone stopped by. So maybe defense will bring that up later. I guess it could later be used to show that Brendan was not “working on the plan” or with the laptop as much that night as Juliana implied.
(Obviously I believe BB was part of every facet of this incomprehensibly evil plan. And killed Christine)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.
Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.
she appears to have a below average IQ to me. She isn't even smart enough to lie about things that are harmful to her future. I have no idea why someone would thing she was a genius lol
She’s gorgeous
Like a female pitbull
Anonymous wrote:All right something popped into my head after this line of questioning about the 23rd. When this first happened we had some people on here saying something about Brendan’s birthday (which I guess it was, I just looked that up in the court records) and they (or someone they knew?) had stopped by or dropped off a present. Had a drink? I don’t remember exactly but it was implied that other people had been in the house on the evening or night of the 23rd.
So during that line of questioning I thought this might come up but obviously Juliana didn’t bring that up (granted she could have not been part of this interaction between BB and the other person). And the defense didn’t specifically ask either. I don’t have any specific theories on that, I just found it interesting.
Just curious if anyone else remembers this. It seems kinda weird to not acknowledge it was Brendan’s birthday or someone stopped by. So maybe defense will bring that up later. I guess it could later be used to show that Brendan was not “working on the plan” or with the laptop as much that night as Juliana implied.
(Obviously I believe BB was part of every facet of this incomprehensibly evil plan. And killed Christine)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
So great that some of you are posting here about the trial. Can you please give us more context when you post. What is in this telegram conversation? What was the issue with how his body was found? Thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.
DP. I found it really upsetting for reasons that have nothing to do with the kink. Getting a sense of Joe’s ‘voice’, and seeing a last message right before he went to the place were he would be murdered for no reason… it’s heartbreaking. I am so, so sorry for his family and other loved ones. 😢
OP here. I agree 100%. It’s so sad that he was lured to his death. I believe that if Joe had the opportunity he would’ve saved Christine from Brendan’s wrath that day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.
DP. I found it really upsetting for reasons that have nothing to do with the kink. Getting a sense of Joe’s ‘voice’, and seeing a last message right before he went to the place were he would be murdered for no reason… it’s heartbreaking. I am so, so sorry for his family and other loved ones. 😢
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases
Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.
My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.