Anonymous wrote:Joes staged body photo is so telling.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.

Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.

she appears to have a below average IQ to me. She isn't even smart enough to lie about things that are harmful to her future. I have no idea why someone would thing she was a genius lol

She’s gorgeous

If you’re blind, I guess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.

Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.

She’s going to get paid for her story.

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

Joes staged body photo is so telling.

I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.

Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.

she appears to have a below average IQ to me. She isn't even smart enough to lie about things that are harmful to her future. I have no idea why someone would thing she was a genius lol

She’s gorgeous

Like a female pitbull

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.

Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.

she appears to have a below average IQ to me. She isn't even smart enough to lie about things that are harmful to her future. I have no idea why someone would thing she was a genius lol

She’s gorgeous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Screen capture.

Yea they said that but they need to show that during the trial.

They are going to bring her back later, I'm sure of it. (They will move to a different witness tomorrow but retain the right to re-call her).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.

Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.

she appears to have a below average IQ to me. She isn't even smart enough to lie about things that are harmful to her future. I have no idea why someone would thing she was a genius lol

Anonymous wrote:Can’t they charge Tess with obstruction?

Maybe after the trial. I wonder if any of these people will have enough money for Joe's mom or someone to take it from them in a court case afterwards. That isn't justice but it certainly would be sweet!

Anonymous wrote:So at first I thought the nanny was dim, after today I think she might be a genius and a psychopath.

Why a genius? She ended up in a shitty situation, even if she is just deported.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's something off about Juliana (besides being a murderer).

I think she is on the spectrum. Something or many things are not right about her.

I agree. I posted about the black and white thinking/responses above.

yes totally! she also is not complex with understanding questions about her emotions. It isnt that people who are on the Autism spectrum are devoid of emotion they just can't respond about them in a nuanced way. I do think she lacks a moral compass totally, I am sure she is sorry she killed Joe, and aided in Christine's death but that she is sorry she got caught and had to watch it. So I think she has a personality disorder and she really did say that she believed when a producer said she had "talent". This is clearly a not bright person who has many disorders. She is not fit to be in society, and she certainly shouldn't be paid to give a story. However I believe Brandon is a sociopathic narcissist to his core and also if you believe in the concept of "evil" he is totally that. It is also clear that he wanted to do this for many years, and in Julianna he found a dupe, who was not smart enough to see through him... he didnt do this because he was in love with the Aupair... he did this because he is this horrible person who sees himself as smarter than everyone. Of course hes not...

Can’t they charge Tess with obstruction?