Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is why Trump made this a campaign issue, if he was involved. He had to know he would be in the files. So why would he run on this?
Two schools of thought on this: 1. He isn't himself in the files, just lots of people he's beholden to. Some perhaps recently. 2. He doesn't actually remember what he did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is why Trump made this a campaign issue, if he was involved. He had to know he would be in the files. So why would he run on this?
Two schools of thought on this: 1. He isn't himself in the files, just lots of people he's beholden to. Some perhaps recently. 2. He doesn't actually remember what he did.
Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is why Trump made this a campaign issue, if he was involved. He had to know he would be in the files. So why would he run on this?
Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is why Trump made this a campaign issue, if he was involved. He had to know he would be in the files. So why would he run on this?
Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is why Trump made this a campaign issue, if he was involved. He had to know he would be in the files. So why would he run on this?
Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is why Trump made this a campaign issue, if he was involved. He had to know he would be in the files. So why would he run on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:David Schuster, formerly of both Fox News and MSNBC, tweeted out that the contents of the Epstein Files are much worse than anyone has articulated.
He is a legit old school journalist and I trust him to report on his sources accurately.
release the files.
With the length of this shutdown, I assume dead girls and live boys are involved.
I really wish we could retire this phrase. It's so sexist and cruel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:David Schuster, formerly of both Fox News and MSNBC, tweeted out that the contents of the Epstein Files are much worse than anyone has articulated.
He is a legit old school journalist and I trust him to report on his sources accurately.
release the files.
With the length of this shutdown, I assume dead girls and live boys are involved.
Anonymous wrote:David Schuster, formerly of both Fox News and MSNBC, tweeted out that the contents of the Epstein Files are much worse than anyone has articulated.
He is a legit old school journalist and I trust him to report on his sources accurately.
release the files.
Anonymous wrote:My question is, why all this nonsense? They control the DOJ and FBI. Why not just take out all the references to Trump and release the rest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we believe people were murdered over this, why do we believe that any literal files still exist? Wouldn’t they be stolen and/or destroyed?
I don’t know about the files per se but as long as the victims are alive (and there are a lot of them) there are still names to be released. Epstein was convicted of trafficking but the people who he sold these girls too are still walking around.
I only know of one victim, Virginia Guiffre, that has come forward and publicly released names. Have any of the other many victims spoken out about specific abusers?
At least 20 have come forward. Do your own research as it is easily available on line!
Have they named specific people as their abusers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOJ tells Republicans, as we thought, Epstein files not good for Trump!
https://l.smartnews.com/p-6x4b2R6E/gwELMg
The survivors who held a rally also participated in an interview. Every single one said trump was not involved in their abuse and they had no knowledge of him abusing others. They were adamant. I'm not a trump supporter, but I believed these women. There are countless victims of epstein, most of whom have not spoken out and it is likely some of them have first hand knowledge of trump's involvement in this.