Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 16:56     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DOJ tells Republicans, as we thought, Epstein files not good for Trump!


https://l.smartnews.com/p-6x4b2R6E/gwELMg

The survivors who held a rally also participated in an interview. Every single one said trump was not involved in their abuse and they had no knowledge of him abusing others. They were adamant. I'm not a trump supporter, but I believed these women. There are countless victims of epstein, most of whom have not spoken out and it is likely some of them have first hand knowledge of trump's involvement in this.[/quote

I believe the women, but we also heard that the FBI spent hours redacting Trump's name from the files.



There are likely many girls who have died. The women speaking out are not all of the girls involved. I suspect it is really bad or else Trump would have released it because he ran on this.


This. Murdered witnesses. Upthread a PP pointed out all parties involved grow pale and silent re. the Epstein files. It's going to be really, really bad for tough, seasoned politicians on all sides to grow pale and silent.
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 16:48     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DOJ tells Republicans, as we thought, Epstein files not good for Trump!


https://l.smartnews.com/p-6x4b2R6E/gwELMg

The survivors who held a rally also participated in an interview. Every single one said trump was not involved in their abuse and they had no knowledge of him abusing others. They were adamant. I'm not a trump supporter, but I believed these women. There are countless victims of epstein, most of whom have not spoken out and it is likely some of them have first hand knowledge of trump's involvement in this.[/quote

I believe the women, but we also heard that the FBI spent hours redacting Trump's name from the files.



There are likely many girls who have died. The women speaking out are not all of the girls involved. I suspect it is really bad or else Trump would have released it because he ran on this.


This. Murdered witnesses.
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 16:45     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?


I believe the cover-up is mulit-faceted:
-It implicates many wealthy and powerful leaders in politics and business
-It implicates Trump and Melania
-It implicates foreign "allies" who were conducting/contributing to Epstein's operation on U.S. soil
-It implicates U.S. three-letter agencies and law enforcement that knew about the abuse of minors and did nothing (likely because they were given intel from the operations)

In short, it will cause American citizens to demand retribution against foreign allies and the U.S. intel community. It will be a massive blackmark of shame for this country.


Agree..
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 16:41     Subject: Epstein Files
Andrew is requested to appear before congress
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 15:15     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?


I believe the cover-up is mulit-faceted:
-It implicates many wealthy and powerful leaders in politics and business
-It implicates Trump and Melania
-It implicates foreign "allies" who were conducting/contributing to Epstein's operation on U.S. soil
-It implicates U.S. three-letter agencies and law enforcement that knew about the abuse of minors and did nothing (likely because they were given intel from the operations)

In short, it will cause American citizens to demand retribution against foreign allies and the U.S. intel community. It will be a massive blackmark of shame for this country.
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:47     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?


This has been answered about twenty times on this thread,!!!


It's nearly 400 pages long! I've read maybe 20 of those pages.


Because, at the time, there was a court order preventing their release.
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:34     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?


This has been answered about twenty times on this thread,!!!


It's nearly 400 pages long! I've read maybe 20 of those pages.
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:33     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?
Because it's rich dems too. We still want them released. Join us!


Oh absolutely! Pitchfork has been sharpened.

It makes no sense to me though that they'd rather lose to Trump and have him wreak havoc than out some rich donors or politicians or whatever (assuming pedophilia is in fact a bridge too far for the majority of the voting population).
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:32     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am not altogether certain that Johnson is going to swear Grijalva in! I can easily envision him contesting her election.

Lol good luck with that, she won with like 70% of the vote and her election was certified more than a month ago.


Trump's d johnson don't care.
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:31     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?


This has been answered about twenty times on this thread,!!!
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:29     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?

Why did Trump kill the FBI investigation that the Biden admin was conducting when he came into office?
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:17     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?
Because it's rich dems too. We still want them released. Join us!


This
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 14:15     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?
Because it's rich dems too. We still want them released. Join us!
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 13:57     Subject: Epstein Files
If things are so bad for Trump, why didn't the previous administration release it?
Anonymous
Post 11/06/2025 13:55     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DOJ tells Republicans, as we thought, Epstein files not good for Trump!


https://l.smartnews.com/p-6x4b2R6E/gwELMg

The survivors who held a rally also participated in an interview. Every single one said trump was not involved in their abuse and they had no knowledge of him abusing others. They were adamant. I'm not a trump supporter, but I believed these women. There are countless victims of epstein, most of whom have not spoken out and it is likely some of them have first hand knowledge of trump's involvement in this.[/quote

I believe the women, but we also heard that the FBI spent hours redacting Trump's name from the files.



There are likely many girls who have died. The women speaking out are not all of the girls involved. I suspect it is really bad or else Trump would have released it because he ran on this.