Anonymous wrote:I dunno, PP just above you, ostensibly on your side, is up there professing that masks don't work and shouldn't be required. So who's spreading disinformation, exactly?
Anonymous wrote:I dunno, PP just above you, ostensibly on your side, is up there professing that masks don't work and shouldn't be required. So who's spreading disinformation, exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Life has returned to normal here.
Totally normal to advocate against testing and against masks when people are dying at higher rates than ever due to Delta surge. So so normal.
Anonymous wrote:Life has returned to normal here.
![]()
Totally normal to advocate against testing and against masks when people are dying at higher rates than ever due to Delta surge. So so normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She had COVID, saw it was nothing (like it is for the vast majority of non-obese, people under 50, and especially people under 30) and sees simple statistics now. She's only stating the facts.
Facts about covid or why cars should be banned?![]()
Either way, if she draws conclusions about public health based on her individual experience that just shows how she doesn’t understand data or the bigger picture.
She has joined Team Reality. She's able to look beyond the irrational fearmongering that is really only going on in a few deep blue areas in the United States, mainly on the East and West Coasts. Life has returned to normal in much of the United States, and even with many people here (see Clarendon on weekends or any sports field in Arlington on the weekends).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She had COVID, saw it was nothing (like it is for the vast majority of non-obese, people under 50, and especially people under 30) and sees simple statistics now. She's only stating the facts.
Facts about covid or why cars should be banned?![]()
Either way, if she draws conclusions about public health based on her individual experience that just shows how she doesn’t understand data or the bigger picture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The H1N1/swine flu was much, much less deadly than Covid. H1N1 infected 6 million people in the US and killed just 12.5K people altogether, for a mortality rate of 0.02% across the whole population. H1N1 killed about 600K people WORLDWIDE, whereas that is how many people it has killed so far in the US alone. Different viruses.
Not to children. It was much deadlier to children (1,800 children estimated in US for H1N1 in 2009-201 vs. 198 for COVID in 2020, 241 in 2021).
All of these regulations are absurd for children at this point, when you compare COVID to H1N1 or other bad flu seasons (434 est. for 2019-2020, 477 for 2018-2019, 643 for 2017-2018, 803 for 2014-2015, 1,161 for 2012-2013).
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html
So children have to be the sole bearer of the burden of COVID regulations, a disease that barely affects them? There are 3 vaccines available for the rest of the population.
You're so ignorant. You just can't, or won't, accept that children are at greater risk now with: the Delta variant, and other adults and teens vaccinated. The Delta variant is more highly and easily transmissible and it and children ARE being hospitalized and some ARE dying. And if you don't stop the spread, MORE children will get the virus, which means more children will have significant illness and/or need hospitalization and/or die. The other poster you're debating with is correct: today's situation and variables are NOT the same as one year ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why do these things for something a fraction less deadly to children than H1N1?
Wait. Are you going to vaccinate your kids - or not?
No, not for a few years since it's disease that does not affect them and it's a new medical treatment that we don't know the long-term effects of (considering it will have just been released - no amount of tests can simulate years of data). I'll let your kids be the medical test subjects, considering you'll be there with them the morning they're eligible (even though they'll have more risk on the car ride to get the vaccinate than they ever did with COVID).
The vast majority of kids under 12 won't get vaccinated anytime soon in the United States, even once it's approved. How do I know? Only a minority of 12 to 15 year olds in the United States have been vaccinated. The UK is not going to approve vaccination for that age group, and their medical panel recommended to not do so for 12-15 year olds because of how small the risk of COVID is to them.
But I can't wait until it gets approved for 5 to 11 year olds because there's no longer any excuse for any of these restrictions then. Not for a disease that will be here forever. There is already none, but this defeats the last argument of the "COVID is going to kill everyone" crowd.
Careful. You sounded like that bike nut who starts inane threads to not-so-subtly push her agenda.
She had COVID, saw it was nothing (like it is for the vast majority of non-obese, people under 50, and especially people under 30) and sees simple statistics now. She's only stating the facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And, there wasn't the significant asymptomatic spread issue COVID has had. People who got H1N1 got sick, stayed home, went to their doctors, got treatment. When necessary, schools shut down quickly and social distancing measures were implemented and followed --- all a consistent cooperation unlike that which people have shown and continue to show in response to COVID.
The flu has significant asymptomatic spread. "As many as 50% of infections with normal seasonal flu may be asymptomatic, which may in part be due to pre-existing partial immunity"
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/cbn/2005/cbnreport_103105.html
Social distancing measures were implemented? I lived through 2009-2010 (it was recent) and have 0 memory of that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The H1N1/swine flu was much, much less deadly than Covid. H1N1 infected 6 million people in the US and killed just 12.5K people altogether, for a mortality rate of 0.02% across the whole population. H1N1 killed about 600K people WORLDWIDE, whereas that is how many people it has killed so far in the US alone. Different viruses.
Not to children. It was much deadlier to children (1,800 children estimated in US for H1N1 in 2009-201 vs. 198 for COVID in 2020, 241 in 2021).
All of these regulations are absurd for children at this point, when you compare COVID to H1N1 or other bad flu seasons (434 est. for 2019-2020, 477 for 2018-2019, 643 for 2017-2018, 803 for 2014-2015, 1,161 for 2012-2013).
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html
So children have to be the sole bearer of the burden of COVID regulations, a disease that barely affects them? There are 3 vaccines available for the rest of the population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The stories on AEM about ResourcePath messes are not inspiring confidence.
Such as?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why do these things for something a fraction less deadly to children than H1N1?
Wait. Are you going to vaccinate your kids - or not?
No, not for a few years since it's disease that does not affect them and it's a new medical treatment that we don't know the long-term effects of (considering it will have just been released - no amount of tests can simulate years of data). I'll let your kids be the medical test subjects, considering you'll be there with them the morning they're eligible (even though they'll have more risk on the car ride to get the vaccinate than they ever did with COVID).
The vast majority of kids under 12 won't get vaccinated anytime soon in the United States, even once it's approved. How do I know? Only a minority of 12 to 15 year olds in the United States have been vaccinated. The UK is not going to approve vaccination for that age group, and their medical panel recommended to not do so for 12-15 year olds because of how small the risk of COVID is to them.
But I can't wait until it gets approved for 5 to 11 year olds because there's no longer any excuse for any of these restrictions then. Not for a disease that will be here forever. There is already none, but this defeats the last argument of the "COVID is going to kill everyone" crowd.
Careful. You sounded like that bike nut who starts inane threads to not-so-subtly push her agenda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The H1N1/swine flu was much, much less deadly than Covid. H1N1 infected 6 million people in the US and killed just 12.5K people altogether, for a mortality rate of 0.02% across the whole population. H1N1 killed about 600K people WORLDWIDE, whereas that is how many people it has killed so far in the US alone. Different viruses.
Not to children. It was much deadlier to children (1,800 children estimated in US for H1N1 in 2009-201 vs. 198 for COVID in 2020, 241 in 2021).
All of these regulations are absurd for children at this point, when you compare COVID to H1N1 or other bad flu seasons (434 est. for 2019-2020, 477 for 2018-2019, 643 for 2017-2018, 803 for 2014-2015, 1,161 for 2012-2013).
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html
So children have to be the sole bearer of the burden of COVID regulations, a disease that barely affects them? There are 3 vaccines available for the rest of the population.
But now Delta is killing kids at a rate of 22 per week, which exceeds the h1n1 rate. But people like you still want to unmask and keep acting like everything is normal when everyone should be doing their best to just kill it off with fire before it mutates again.