Can you point out where people have been discussing her mouth shape and teeth? I have not seen that.

Michelle’s hair texture has been discussed in context of processes used to straighten AA women’s hair, which is controversial in the AA community. As a half African woman, I know that well. I haven’t seen any posts talking specifically that Michelle’s hair is “bad” or “ugly,” can you point those out as well?

And she is dressing differently than she did in the WH, and a lot of it doesn’t fit her body type. She is a tall woman and she’s gained weight. She needs a better stylist to help her find flattering clothes. It can be done. She looked great and dressed well as FLOTUS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is just so big. And I don’t mean fat. Just a very large person.

That’s a nice way of putting it.

Better than looking plastic and no backside. Certain fellas like something they can grab a hold of.

We are talking fashion, not Sir Mix A lot.

No, you're not. You're talking against natural attributes that MO has. I've heard 'you' talk about the texture of her hair, her mouth shape and teeth, etc. And, yes, Melania and Ivanka Trump have had their faces slapped but nothing like the denigrating physical remarks that genetically MO has absolutely no control over.

You are entitled to your opinions, of course, but don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining.

So, we can move on.

Are you hearing voices in your head? I have never uttered a single word about the texture of Michelle’s hair, nor her mouth shape and teeth! I don’t think her mouth shape or the appearance of her teeth have been discussed in this thread. If it has, please point it out. There’s no urine on your leg, but there is definitely diarrhea coming out of your mouth.

NP. And I also noticed in this thread that there are a lot of negative remarks about Michelle's body build, hair, and other comments. You might not have made them but they are most definitely there.

I totally agree with the PP. If you want to talk about ugly clothes and shoes, in anyone's opinion, that's cool but physically attributes that can't be controlled is not.

And as far as the PP having diarrhea in her mouth, you're up there yourself. Just saying.

One more thing I've noticed. I never saw Michelle Obama mentioned virtually at all in the 500 pages of the Melania thread though I didn't keep up with all 500 pages but quite a lot. Yet Melania Trump is all over this thread comparing her to Michelle Obama. Interesting. Though for the sake of argument, there was a lot of comparing Melania to Ivanka.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is just so big. And I don’t mean fat. Just a very large person.

That’s a nice way of putting it.

Better than looking plastic and no backside. Certain fellas like something they can grab a hold of.

We are talking fashion, not Sir Mix A lot.

No, you're not. You're talking against natural attributes that MO has. I've heard 'you' talk about the texture of her hair, her mouth shape and teeth, etc. And, yes, Melania and Ivanka Trump have had their faces slapped but nothing like the denigrating physical remarks that genetically MO has absolutely no control over.

You are entitled to your opinions, of course, but don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining.

So, we can move on.

Are you hearing voices in your head? I have never uttered a single word about the texture of Michelle’s hair, nor her mouth shape and teeth! I don’t think her mouth shape or the appearance of her teeth have been discussed in this thread. If it has, please point it out. There’s no urine on your leg, but there is definitely diarrhea coming out of your mouth.

NP. And I also noticed in this thread that there are a lot of negative remarks about Michelle's body build, hair, and other comments. You might not have made them but they are most definitely there.

I totally agree with the PP. If you want to talk about ugly clothes and shoes, in anyone's opinion, that's cool but physically attributes that can't be controlled is not.

And as far as the PP having diarrhea in her mouth, you're up there yourself. Just saying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please post MO’s photo with Oprah from today’s Style Section?

Do you have the link?

We discussed this like one or two pages ago.

No, not really. Michelle’s waist appears to be tiny, but then her pelvis juts out like a deformity. Maybe it’s just that ugly blouse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please post MO’s photo with Oprah from today’s Style Section?

Do you have the link?

We discussed this like one or two pages ago.

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please post MO’s photo with Oprah from today’s Style Section?

Do you have the link?

Can someone please post MO’s photo with Oprah from today’s Style Section?

Anonymous wrote:

IRL she is gorgeous.

Highly unlikely. Just doesn't have any gorgeous feature.
And that's OK.

Truth

IRL she is gorgeous.

Highly unlikely. Just doesn't have any gorgeous feature.
And that's OK.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is that blue monstrosity? A mariachi tracksuit?

I don't mind it. Its not her best, but its not her worst. The colors are fun.

It's not her worst, no.

I think MO is just dressing for her own fun and following her own sense of what looks good. It doesn't make her a fashion icon. Good for her.

But we should not all pretend she’s a gorgeous and fashionable icon.

No, we shouldn't. I think she has an engaging face though.

Her face is yuck.

IRL she is gorgeous.

Anonymous wrote:The high waisted pants are just not flattering for MO. But why the comparisons to Melania. In addition to this being a MO thread, Mel is a model/trophy wife/FL. It has always been her job to look pretty and not have ideas. MO is a highly educated, intelligent woman, dressing to fit her real body. Yes Mel is attractive, but vacant. Why the comparison?

Well, you can put it that way, but Mel does have ideas how to look good most of the time. Those ideas might be worthless to you, but it doesn't change the fact that she's more fashion savvy and creative in that field (more feminine too) than Michelle.

MO doesn't dress to fit her real body, she dresses to fit her imaginary body, big difference.

She is just so big. And I don’t mean fat. Just a very large person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is that blue monstrosity? A mariachi tracksuit?

I don't mind it. Its not her best, but its not her worst. The colors are fun.

It's not her worst, no.

I think MO is just dressing for her own fun and following her own sense of what looks good. It doesn't make her a fashion icon. Good for her.

But we should not all pretend she’s a gorgeous and fashionable icon.

No, we shouldn't. I think she has an engaging face though.

Her face is yuck.

Anonymous wrote:The high waisted pants are just not flattering for MO. But why the comparisons to Melania. In addition to this being a MO thread, Mel is a model/trophy wife/FL. It has always been her job to look pretty and not have ideas. MO is a highly educated, intelligent woman, dressing to fit her real body. Yes Mel is attractive, but vacant. Why the comparison?

But you CAN dress her real body and look good in the process. No we shouldn't compare her with Melania - who has that type of budget! - but it is certainly possible for MO to choose pieces that are more flattering to her. Whatever your body, there is SOMETHING that will work better than other things.