Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently, Hillary was elected, at least according to Corey Lewandowski!

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/357623-lewandowski-the-focus-should-be-on-the-continued-lies-of-the

Those were some very intriguing remarks.

One has to wonder why there’s so much effort at this time to discredit a candidate that didn’t win and a party that has no power.

It’s almost as if, a year later, they’re launching the game plan they would have run after she won.

But they didn’t have to, because Trump won. And Republicans control all three branches of government. And that government has PLENTY of issues that need to be addressed.

So why pull all this stuff out now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

Your analogy was dumb and nonsensical. I'm glad you sleep well. I hope it continues, in the coming days.

Anonymous wrote:Apparently, Hillary was elected, at least according to Corey Lewandowski!

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/357623-lewandowski-the-focus-should-be-on-the-continued-lies-of-the

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

I believe this to be true. It's not about democratic royalty though. It's more about $$$

Which is why he left a multimillion dollar big law partnership to be a fed? Really?

Money, power, and fame make people do really bad things, right?

He was the guy who brought down Enron.
The former head of the FBI
Probably one of the highest paid attorneys in DC


He had money. He had fame (among people who pay attention anyway). He had power. And he is going out of his way to be as low profile as humanly possible. He gives no comments. He never speaks to the press. He never leaks. (Thank God) he never tweets. He never gives interviews. No one ever seems to snap a photo of him eating dinner in Georgetown with his wife, FFS.

He never leaks? BWAAHHAHHAAA. Then CNN is lying.

Or a grand juror leaked. Or Courthouse staff. Or a Judge. Or defense attorneys who were notified. Or a target, who was notified. The list of non DOJ folks who knew is lengthy.

And Mueller is ultimately responsible. I don't see much fury from him about those leaks publicly. Do you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Not everyone. And certainly not anymore, given what's been uncovered.

1. Name someone in the Senate or House Leadership who came out, week one against Mueller. We’ll wait here (for a long time). Please provide a link. Not Breitbart.

2. Tell us what has been uncovered about Mueller that has changed everyone’s mind. Again. Link your source. Not Breitbart. Or Fox News on this one.

1) Ted Cruz
2) Everyone's mind? Nothing changes everyone's mind about anything. Mueller's relationship with Comey, as well as the latest news that Mueller was in charge of the FBI during the Uranium deal.

You can go back and find links you like.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

I believe this to be true. It's not about democratic royalty though. It's more about $$$

Which is why he left a multimillion dollar big law partnership to be a fed? Really?

Money, power, and fame make people do really bad things, right?

He was the guy who brought down Enron.
The former head of the FBI
Probably one of the highest paid attorneys in DC


He had money. He had fame (among people who pay attention anyway). He had power. And he is going out of his way to be as low profile as humanly possible. He gives no comments. He never speaks to the press. He never leaks. (Thank God) he never tweets. He never gives interviews. No one ever seems to snap a photo of him eating dinner in Georgetown with his wife, FFS.

He never leaks? BWAAHHAHHAAA. Then CNN is lying.

Or a grand juror leaked. Or Courthouse staff. Or a Judge. Or defense attorneys who were notified. Or a target, who was notified. The list of non DOJ folks who knew is lengthy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

So you are saying that, the government— Trump and the House and Senate Republicans, have turned their guns on the iAmerican people. Interesting take for a Trumpkin. But accurate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Not everyone. And certainly not anymore, given what's been uncovered.

1. Name someone in the Senate or House Leadership who came out, week one against Mueller. We’ll wait here (for a long time). Please provide a link. Not Breitbart.

2. Tell us what has been uncovered about Mueller that has changed everyone’s mind. Again. Link your source. Not Breitbart. Or Fox News on this one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Snort - are you slow? No, I'm saying that when government starts pointing guns inward at its own people, we become a banana republic. And that's exactly what's going on here by globalist elitists. The America First agenda is a HUGE problem for them. By electing Hillary that was to be their final nail in America's coffin. However, the American people said "no thanks" and elected Trump. Keeps a smile on my face as I lie down to sleep each night.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

I believe this to be true. It's not about democratic royalty though. It's more about $$$

Which is why he left a multimillion dollar big law partnership to be a fed? Really?

Money, power, and fame make people do really bad things, right?

He was the guy who brought down Enron.
The former head of the FBI
Probably one of the highest paid attorneys in DC


He had money. He had fame (among people who pay attention anyway). He had power. And he is going out of his way to be as low profile as humanly possible. He gives no comments. He never speaks to the press. He never leaks. (Thank God) he never tweets. He never gives interviews. No one ever seems to snap a photo of him eating dinner in Georgetown with his wife, FFS.

He never leaks? BWAAHHAHHAAA. Then CNN is lying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

I believe this to be true. It's not about democratic royalty though. It's more about $$$

Which is why he left a multimillion dollar big law partnership to be a fed? Really?

Money, power, and fame make people do really bad things, right?

He was the guy who brought down Enron.
The former head of the FBI
Probably one of the highest paid attorneys in DC


He had money. He had fame (among people who pay attention anyway). He had power. And he is going out of his way to be as low profile as humanly possible. He gives no comments. He never speaks to the press. He never leaks. (Thank God) he never tweets. He never gives interviews. No one ever seems to snap a photo of him eating dinner in Georgetown with his wife, FFS.

He never leaks? BWAAHHAHHAAA. Then CNN is lying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

PP is saying that Trump is pointing the gun at himself. He is his own worst enemy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Not everyone. And certainly not anymore, given what's been uncovered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.