Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people on board with the spy-connections theories, this was interesting. Text exchange from 2018, I’m not sure who was the 2nd man. This follows a reference to someone named “Ivana,” no context so it’s not necessarily Trump’s first wife, but she’s described as older than HRC:

Redacted guy: Was she a madame Claude associate’?

JE: No, Claude only took educated women

RG: Ouch

JE: They all went to accent reduction class. Taught by a guy that told great stories. Sam Chwat

JE: She reported to and was protected by French intelligence

JE: They were referred to not as red sparrows but as French swallows. An amazing intel op

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=4226062bf8cfe1d3_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

It has always been obvious to me the first wife was likely a spy/handler. This moron has been a Jewish mob asset for 50 plus years. You think Roy Cohn and Robert Maxwell let him marry some random woman?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Well, one facially plausible answer would be that Maxwell’s camp is leaking it now in hoping to spook Trump into pardon.

—guy who is probably to the right of the median DCUM poster

That doesn't make sense (and I don't care that you're righty, your neurons work just as well as mine). Maxwell benefits only if nothing gets out, so she can be of value to Trump (and others) by being the sole repository of dangerous info and agree to silence in exchange for clemency or creature comforts. This also makes her a potential target of assassination, but of course, she can protect herself by the release of data upon her death, via attorneys. If everything gets out in the open, she has no value whatsoever. Her role in the trafficking is better known, and thus... the possibility of getting out of prison early or benefiting from a pardon becomes remote.

So I really don't think Maxwell is leaking anything.

I’m the person you’re responding to. Imagine that she had something super damning on Trump. I’m not saying she does, but just assume it for a sec. You could easily imagine Maxwell thinking that Trump would assume she’s too afraid to leak lest powerful people kill her before her stuff on them comes out. By releasing something bad but not fatal, she could be signaling to Trump that now is the time to cut a deal before she releases whatever else she’s got.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Well, one facially plausible answer would be that Maxwell’s camp is leaking it now in hoping to spook Trump into pardon.

—guy who is probably to the right of the median DCUM poster

That doesn't make sense (and I don't care that you're righty, your neurons work just as well as mine). Maxwell benefits only if nothing gets out, so she can be of value to Trump (and others) by being the sole repository of dangerous info and agree to silence in exchange for clemency or creature comforts. This also makes her a potential target of assassination, but of course, she can protect herself by the release of data upon her death, via attorneys. If everything gets out in the open, she has no value whatsoever. Her role in the trafficking is better known, and thus... the possibility of getting out of prison early or benefiting from a pardon becomes remote.

So I really don't think Maxwell is leaking anything.

Anonymous wrote:This is all so hilarious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Well, one facially plausible answer would be that Maxwell’s camp is leaking it now in hoping to spook Trump into pardon.

—guy who is probably to the right of the median DCUM poster

Do you think the MAGAs turn on him if he pardons Maxwell or nah? There must be a limit, right? Or maybe not, they let him get away with J6.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We do not know whose name was redacted.

Republicans have stated that it was a victim who has stated that Mr. Trump did nothing inappropriate. This helps Mr. Trump if, in fact, that was the name which was redacted.

A real concern regarding the Epstein files is whether or not it contains allegations and details of money laundering for Russia. This concern was raised recently by a prominent Democrat strategist on a major cable news network a couple of days ago.

That’s far from the only real concern. Who knows what’s in there but there is obviously stuff in there that Trump is desperate to keep hidden.

To me, to strangest rumor going around (based on the emails) has to do with a possible sexual relationship between Trump and “bubba,” who people assume is exactly who you think it is.

There is allegedly an email between the brothers epstein where the one who wasn't a convicted pedo asks the other if "Putin has the photo of trump blowing bubba"

I don't believe it. The emails are now publicly available. You can post any of them here. Do so.

Searchable database:

https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/

It’s true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Well, one facially plausible answer would be that Maxwell’s camp is leaking it now in hoping to spook Trump into pardon.

—guy who is probably to the right of the median DCUM poster

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Well, one facially plausible answer would be that Maxwell’s camp is leaking it now in hoping to spook Trump into pardon.

—guy who is probably to the right of the median DCUM poster

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

Tender years is a child under 7. I promise I’m not a foreign troll. I thought Republicans thought mothers should raise their children. It’s not as if she’s a highly educated lawyer who performs a role no one else can fill. I’m surprised no one has pointed out the suspicious origin of her child. She’s supposed to be a good Catholic but she had a kid out of wedlock. Bad look. I bet Trump is the father. Kid is blond while her husband is a dark Italian.

Anonymous wrote:For the people on board with the spy-connections theories, this was interesting. Text exchange from 2018, I’m not sure who was the 2nd man. This follows a reference to someone named “Ivana,” no context so it’s not necessarily Trump’s first wife, but she’s described as older than HRC:

Redacted guy: Was she a madame Claude associate’?

JE: No, Claude only took educated women

RG: Ouch

JE: They all went to accent reduction class. Taught by a guy that told great stories. Sam Chwat

JE: She reported to and was protected by French intelligence

JE: They were referred to not as red sparrows but as French swallows. An amazing intel op

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=4226062bf8cfe1d3_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Biden release this information

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So it seems almost obvious that Trump ordered hits on Epstein and Guiffre, right? Ghislaine Maxwell should maybe be worried

I am as anti-Trump as you can get, but it's silly to think Trump was the only one who wanted Epstein dead. Epstein was tangled up in a lot of nefarious business dealings with all kinds of powerful people. I wouldn't be surprised if a foreign entity was behind it. But let's be real, regardless of who actually arranged the hit, there are lots of people who breathed a sigh of relief once it happened.

.

Why haas there been no reporting on the guards who were supposedly asleep when Epstein died? I’ve read they were fired. Were they paid off or are they even still alive? Why haven’t they had to testify to Congress?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing screams “Trump was all up in Epstein’s sick world and lovin’ it” louder than ordering DOJ to start digging up the names of Democrats also on the island.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/11/14/trump-justice-epstein-democrats/?itid=hp-mv-top-stories_top-table-main_p001_f001

Sure, we care, very much so, we need the full list of participants, dead and alive, but the big problem the country needs to address is the current POTUS right here, right now in 2025. Should he be in prison and on the sex offender list for the rest of his pathetic life? That’s the pressing question.

Clinton being involved isn’t going to make Trump any less guilty. He can throw the ball, but why oh why would we follow. He’s the POTUS, and a POTUS well-known for being an perv. And he’s been abusing this country and its people and their tax dollars since he stepped back in the Oval office. Many of us, including MAGA, would still want him impeached and removed (along with all the gold crap); Clinton’s involvement isn’t going to change that one bit.

+1 who cares about Clinton. He's not POTUS, nor was he the one who campaigned on releasing the files.

Put Clinton and Trump both under oath and ask them about the blowjob story!

I imagine that bill Clinton hates trump as much as Hillary hates trump.