Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

lmao careful, there’s a whole bunch of npc’s hired to berate and fight you if you say revolution is a crappy club. Their main rebuttal is that they “have a nice facility to play on”. Draw your own conclusions

Compared to what Revolution was even a year ago, I’d say they are much more of a competitor to Loudoun this year. At the same level? Of course not, but enough for overlooked Loudoun players to start looking their way.

And that is because they are in GA? I guess you missed the memo that ECNL is the highest level of female youth soccer. But ok.

So be second or third team at Loudoun instead of national exposure with Rev?

You said it, Rev's top team is equivalent to Loudoun's 3rd teams

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

lmao careful, there’s a whole bunch of npc’s hired to berate and fight you if you say revolution is a crappy club. Their main rebuttal is that they “have a nice facility to play on”. Draw your own conclusions

Compared to what Revolution was even a year ago, I’d say they are much more of a competitor to Loudoun this year. At the same level? Of course not, but enough for overlooked Loudoun players to start looking their way.

And that is because they are in GA? I guess you missed the memo that ECNL is the highest level of female youth soccer. But ok.

So be second or third team at Loudoun instead of national exposure with Rev?

You said it, Rev's top team is equivalent to Loudoun's 3rd teams

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

lmao careful, there’s a whole bunch of npc’s hired to berate and fight you if you say revolution is a crappy club. Their main rebuttal is that they “have a nice facility to play on”. Draw your own conclusions

Compared to what Revolution was even a year ago, I’d say they are much more of a competitor to Loudoun this year. At the same level? Of course not, but enough for overlooked Loudoun players to start looking their way.

And that is because they are in GA? I guess you missed the memo that ECNL is the highest level of female youth soccer. But ok.

So be second or third team at Loudoun instead of national exposure with Rev?

You said it, Rev's top team is equivalent to Loudoun's 3rd teams

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

lmao careful, there’s a whole bunch of npc’s hired to berate and fight you if you say revolution is a crappy club. Their main rebuttal is that they “have a nice facility to play on”. Draw your own conclusions

Compared to what Revolution was even a year ago, I’d say they are much more of a competitor to Loudoun this year. At the same level? Of course not, but enough for overlooked Loudoun players to start looking their way.

And that is because they are in GA? I guess you missed the memo that ECNL is the highest level of female youth soccer. But ok.

So be second or third team at Loudoun instead of national exposure with Rev?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

lmao careful, there’s a whole bunch of npc’s hired to berate and fight you if you say revolution is a crappy club. Their main rebuttal is that they “have a nice facility to play on”. Draw your own conclusions

Compared to what Revolution was even a year ago, I’d say they are much more of a competitor to Loudoun this year. At the same level? Of course not, but enough for overlooked Loudoun players to start looking their way.

And that is because they are in GA? I guess you missed the memo that ECNL is the highest level of female youth soccer. But ok.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

lmao careful, there’s a whole bunch of npc’s hired to berate and fight you if you say revolution is a crappy club. Their main rebuttal is that they “have a nice facility to play on”. Draw your own conclusions

Compared to what Revolution was even a year ago, I’d say they are much more of a competitor to Loudoun this year. At the same level? Of course not, but enough for overlooked Loudoun players to start looking their way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

lmao careful, there’s a whole bunch of npc’s hired to berate and fight you if you say revolution is a crappy club. Their main rebuttal is that they “have a nice facility to play on”. Draw your own conclusions

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

If they say Revolution or TSJ they lose all credibility

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

Yes they will continue to fill rosters even with limited placements. Loudoun Soccer has never been great at college placements or winning at the older age groups but it hasn’t been a problem filling rosters before. They have a huge rec and travel program that dwarfs the other clubs.

I assume your other two options are Revolution and TSJ? One of those is not really viable and we’ll soon be back down to two in the county. Loudoun Soccer and the anti-Loudoun Soccer option.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

What are the 2 other clubs that are viable options?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.

Do you think Loudoun will continue to fill rosters for six teams per age group if they don’t perform and also place kids in college? There are now two other viable options in Loudoun county. Who is silly and uninformed?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seem like a mess in Loudoun G 2014-2012!

dont leave the 11s out or the boys. Also NVA isn’t Loudoun. Its an alliance which is like an upgrade of Loudoun Red…


Loudoun Red+ if u will

lol keep telling yourself that

u know its an upgrade w all the valor players.

Red+ ftw.

Despite all the shade and BS NVA & Loudoun still >>> FCV >>> revolution

This attitude is why Loudoun/NVA sucks. The same old Loudoun. Win at younger ages due to size of player pool and athleticism and lose as they get older because there is no soccer development at the club.

And the worst part is that they don't care. They'll gladly take your money for no development. If you get unhappy with that lack of development and leave, then they pull from the nine teams below and move on as if you were never there.

Sounds like a pretty good business model to me. Many clubs would love to have that

.... Would like to have piss poor older teams with laughable college placements compared to a the other clubs in the area? Sure.

You think college placements are some kind of measuring stick. But clubs and coaches don’t think that way. They just care about filling all the rosters with paying customers. Coaches get paid the same no matter how many college placements. Club revenues don’t change. I mean, of course they would take more placements but only because the effect it could have to help fill rosters. What you think is a flex is not. It makes you seem silly and uninformed.