Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 22:04     Subject: Whittle
Oy. Maret parent that doesn't want to see another Maret parent challenge what's going on? Bisgaards are sketchy. Own it.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 21:59     Subject: Whittle
Anonymous wrote:Maret parent here. Questioning so much here. Why, why, why take damaged goods when there are clearly people out there who could have served our community better. Wife seems particularly dubious with her behaviors, I can't lie...


Like clockwork. Every time this thread falls down the home page and has no recent posts there’s a new “as a Maret parent”, “Maret parent here” or “zomg, here’s some new juicy gossip [that was discussed on page 20 of this thread already”.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 21:54     Subject: Whittle
Maret parent here. Questioning so much here. Why, why, why take damaged goods when there are clearly people out there who could have served our community better. Wife seems particularly dubious with her behaviors, I can't lie...
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 13:36     Subject: Re:Whittle
Anonymous wrote:Back to the facts:

from July 2021 Wall St Journal:

Chris Whittle:
"He said he had taken out a very large mortgage on the property in order to fund his latest venture, Whittle School & Studios, another for-profit school network, but the Covid-19 crisis derailed his plans. When Covid hit, it interrupted schools all over the world,” he said. “Over the last 18 months, I really had a terrible Sophie’s Choice: to support the school or support the home. I chose the school. Today’s really the result of that.”

So...what mortgage? None of the ones in court appear to have done more than pay back some old Avenues-and -friends debts. Did the wife step in with a loan? A reporter should get to the bottom of this because it was the argument used by senior leadership and parent leadership to convince parents to open their pocketbooks "like Chris did". Any mortgage would have to be registered in Suffolk County. Not saying he's lying ..just asking for the facts.

Who gave you the mortgage referred to, Chris? How much? What was the disbursement schedule on it ? when? How did that money get transferred to the school?

Surely your Board had to approve this, no? It makes a really good story if it's true, so he has every incentive to be much more open about this.


The Board on which a Bisgaard sat eh?
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 13:34     Subject: Whittle
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If this board is so wrong, why don’t the Bisgaards etc come out and do a tell all and reassure folks they didn’t get paid while teachers went unpaid and boarders went without meals, they didn’t have any privileged information and there was nothing shady? If they have nothing to hide, this should be easy.

Ditto the other inner circle families, except for the getting paid part? But maybe getting repaid part?


It's because no one cares other than the handful of Maret haters on this thread who keep bumping this thread because they're hurt that Larlo didn't get accepted to Maret and have a bone to pick.


Bisgaard deleted his 2021 Whittle supporting tweet since this thread took off. Touched a nerve?


Maybe DCUM admin deleted it like he does anything that’s remotely critical of Maret?


…says the person posting this in a 38-page thread bashing Maret that’s still up and running and ready to receive another day’s worth of theories, innuendo and amateur sleuthing about the new HoS.


No one is bashing Maret. People are shocked by the unpacking of the scandal and as the result of the findings, question the HOS foisted upon Maret despite the community’s objections. At the time of his hiring many of these things weren’t known from the dodgy parent committee to his wife’s role on it and in Whittles inner circle to the bitter end to the schools implosion after only 3 years. If your job depended on placing the right candidates, would this be your top choice? How would you possibly defend it?

Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 13:30     Subject: Re:Whittle
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm still shook that Whittle is not listed as a prior employer on the new HOS' announcement to the Maret family. Was this intentional?


What do you think?


I also heard he’s Illuminati and they didn’t mention that either. I think we’re at the point where we need a William Shatner narrated Netflix documentary on this.


I know you think that mocking this scandal /slo-mo car crash might trivialize the culpability and harm, which are real, or put people off the scent. But the malfeasance by these people is so obvious that it’s making it more and more interesting everytime you scream move on, nothing to see here folks.

At very best, shockingly poor judgment and extremely self-serving attitude, neither of which recommend any of these people for anything, let alone for HOS of a premier school.

If there was nothing to it, Bisgarrds would have made a statement and wouldnt be scrubbing their twitter of 2021 support for Whittle
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 12:55     Subject: Re:Whittle
No. This wasn't a business story. Just a real estate story with splashy photos of his house so they rarely do deep vetting.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 12:26     Subject: Re:Whittle
Anonymous wrote:Back to the facts:

from July 2021 Wall St Journal:

Chris Whittle:
"He said he had taken out a very large mortgage on the property in order to fund his latest venture, Whittle School & Studios, another for-profit school network, but the Covid-19 crisis derailed his plans. When Covid hit, it interrupted schools all over the world,” he said. “Over the last 18 months, I really had a terrible Sophie’s Choice: to support the school or support the home. I chose the school. Today’s really the result of that.”

So...what mortgage? None of the ones in court appear to have done more than pay back some old Avenues-and -friends debts. Did the wife step in with a loan? A reporter should get to the bottom of this because it was the argument used by senior leadership and parent leadership to convince parents to open their pocketbooks "like Chris did". Any mortgage would have to be registered in Suffolk County. Not saying he's lying ..just asking for the facts.

Who gave you the mortgage referred to, Chris? How much? What was the disbursement schedule on it ? when? How did that money get transferred to the school?

Surely your Board had to approve this, no? It makes a really good story if it's true, so he has every incentive to be much more open about this.


You could email the WSJ reported to confirm the mortgage. I'm sure the WSJ fact-checkers would have looked into it if it made it into the story without a caveat by the reported that no such mortgage was able to be confirmed.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 11:59     Subject: Re:Whittle
Back to the facts:

from July 2021 Wall St Journal:

Chris Whittle:
"He said he had taken out a very large mortgage on the property in order to fund his latest venture, Whittle School & Studios, another for-profit school network, but the Covid-19 crisis derailed his plans. When Covid hit, it interrupted schools all over the world,” he said. “Over the last 18 months, I really had a terrible Sophie’s Choice: to support the school or support the home. I chose the school. Today’s really the result of that.”

So...what mortgage? None of the ones in court appear to have done more than pay back some old Avenues-and -friends debts. Did the wife step in with a loan? A reporter should get to the bottom of this because it was the argument used by senior leadership and parent leadership to convince parents to open their pocketbooks "like Chris did". Any mortgage would have to be registered in Suffolk County. Not saying he's lying ..just asking for the facts.

Who gave you the mortgage referred to, Chris? How much? What was the disbursement schedule on it ? when? How did that money get transferred to the school?

Surely your Board had to approve this, no? It makes a really good story if it's true, so he has every incentive to be much more open about this.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 11:27     Subject: Whittle
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If this board is so wrong, why don’t the Bisgaards etc come out and do a tell all and reassure folks they didn’t get paid while teachers went unpaid and boarders went without meals, they didn’t have any privileged information and there was nothing shady? If they have nothing to hide, this should be easy.

Ditto the other inner circle families, except for the getting paid part? But maybe getting repaid part?


It's because no one cares other than the handful of Maret haters on this thread who keep bumping this thread because they're hurt that Larlo didn't get accepted to Maret and have a bone to pick.


Bisgaard deleted his 2021 Whittle supporting tweet since this thread took off. Touched a nerve?


Maybe DCUM admin deleted it like he does anything that’s remotely critical of Maret?


…says the person posting this in a 38-page thread bashing Maret that’s still up and running and ready to receive another day’s worth of theories, innuendo and amateur sleuthing about the new HoS.


Lol there’s no moral high ground on this site, honey.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 09:56     Subject: Re:Whittle
Anonymous wrote:
I also heard he’s Illuminati and they didn’t mention that either. I think we’re at the point where we need a William Shatner narrated Netflix documentary on this.


Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 09:31     Subject: Whittle
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If this board is so wrong, why don’t the Bisgaards etc come out and do a tell all and reassure folks they didn’t get paid while teachers went unpaid and boarders went without meals, they didn’t have any privileged information and there was nothing shady? If they have nothing to hide, this should be easy.

Ditto the other inner circle families, except for the getting paid part? But maybe getting repaid part?


It's because no one cares other than the handful of Maret haters on this thread who keep bumping this thread because they're hurt that Larlo didn't get accepted to Maret and have a bone to pick.


Bisgaard deleted his 2021 Whittle supporting tweet since this thread took off. Touched a nerve?


Maybe DCUM admin deleted it like he does anything that’s remotely critical of Maret?


…says the person posting this in a 38-page thread bashing Maret that’s still up and running and ready to receive another day’s worth of theories, innuendo and amateur sleuthing about the new HoS.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2022 09:30     Subject: Re:Whittle
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm still shook that Whittle is not listed as a prior employer on the new HOS' announcement to the Maret family. Was this intentional?


What do you think?


I also heard he’s Illuminati and they didn’t mention that either. I think we’re at the point where we need a William Shatner narrated Netflix documentary on this.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2022 23:14     Subject: Whittle
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If this board is so wrong, why don’t the Bisgaards etc come out and do a tell all and reassure folks they didn’t get paid while teachers went unpaid and boarders went without meals, they didn’t have any privileged information and there was nothing shady? If they have nothing to hide, this should be easy.

Ditto the other inner circle families, except for the getting paid part? But maybe getting repaid part?


It's because no one cares other than the handful of Maret haters on this thread who keep bumping this thread because they're hurt that Larlo didn't get accepted to Maret and have a bone to pick.


Bisgaard deleted his 2021 Whittle supporting tweet since this thread took off. Touched a nerve?


Maybe DCUM admin deleted it like he does anything that’s remotely critical of Maret?
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2022 22:06     Subject: Re:Whittle
Anonymous wrote:I'm still shook that Whittle is not listed as a prior employer on the new HOS' announcement to the Maret family. Was this intentional?


What do you think?