Anonymous
03/30/2022 17:37
Subject: Re:Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:
“When President Biden nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, Republicans knew they probably wouldn’t be able to stop her confirmation. But they hoped to make it controversial enough that the process would still be a political win for them.
With a new poll indicating surprisingly broad support for Jackson, it now looks as though they failed spectacularly on both counts.”
She's truly impressive!!
Anonymous
Anonymous
03/30/2022 15:21
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?
If by “soundly debunked,” you mean:
- excused
- minimized
- astroturfed, etc.,
Well, I guess you could define “debunked”’any way you want.
Her sentencing patterns in these cases don’t differ from those of every other federal judge, including the ones that Trump appointed and Hawley & company voted for.
In fact, some were lighter than the probation officers recommended and they are known for being lenient.
In fact, other federal district judges make those very same determinations in the same way that Jackson did. Hers aren’t at all an outlier.
Anonymous
03/30/2022 15:11
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
She will probably be confirmed and we will soon see where she stands.
Anonymous
03/30/2022 15:10
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?
If by “soundly debunked,” you mean:
- excused
- minimized
- astroturfed, etc.,
Well, I guess you could define “debunked”’any way you want.
Her sentencing patterns in these cases don’t differ from those of every other federal judge, including the ones that Trump appointed and Hawley & company voted for.
In fact, some were lighter than the probation officers recommended and they are known for being lenient.
Anonymous
03/30/2022 15:05
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?
If by “soundly debunked,” you mean:
- excused
- minimized
- astroturfed, etc.,
Well, I guess you could define “debunked”’any way you want.
Her sentencing patterns in these cases don’t differ from those of every other federal judge, including the ones that Trump appointed and Hawley & company voted for.
In addition, her sentences fall clearly within the federal sentencing guidelines that were created by Congress. If these Senators want to protest, they should start legislation to reform the sentencing guidelines that they themselves have created.
You can't complain about judges following sentences guidelines that you, yourself (in this case Congress) has written.
Anonymous
03/30/2022 15:01
Subject: Re:Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
“When President Biden nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, Republicans knew they probably wouldn’t be able to stop her confirmation. But they hoped to make it controversial enough that the process would still be a political win for them.
With a new poll indicating surprisingly broad support for Jackson, it now looks as though they failed spectacularly on both counts.”
Anonymous
03/30/2022 13:57
Subject: Re:Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Wall Street Journal reporting Susan Collins will vote yes.
Also reported in NYT now.
Anonymous
03/30/2022 08:45
Subject: Re:Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Wall Street Journal reporting Susan Collins will vote yes.
Anonymous
03/30/2022 08:44
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?
If by “soundly debunked,” you mean:
- excused
- minimized
- astroturfed, etc.,
Well, I guess you could define “debunked”’any way you want.
Her sentencing patterns in these cases don’t differ from those of every other federal judge, including the ones that Trump appointed and Hawley & company voted for.
Anonymous
03/30/2022 08:43
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
She’s given sentences in line with her peers (including Republicans).
Why doesn’t the GOP discipline the pedophiles in their ranks?
Anonymous
03/29/2022 22:17
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?
If by “soundly debunked,” you mean:
- excused
- minimized
- astroturfed, etc.,
Well, I guess you could define “debunked”’any way you want.
Anonymous
03/29/2022 12:47
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?
It hasn't been debunked.
The Democrats curiously held back some of the most egregious cases for which she imposed light sentences.
Why might that be??????
It has been debunked, goober. Scroll back. And when people put links in, try looking at them the first time instead of hurdurduring your way through your ignorance.
Anonymous
03/29/2022 11:20
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?
It hasn't been debunked.
The Democrats curiously held back some of the most egregious cases for which she imposed light sentences.
Why might that be??????
Anonymous
03/29/2022 10:48
Subject: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see GOP trash is trying to circle back to their favorite group: pedophiles.
Why has KBJ given pedophiles and child pornography fans such light sentences?
Why do bad faith regressives constantly post "just asking" questions when the entire premise has been soundly debunked many times on the very comment thread they're posting on?