Anonymous wrote:Where can we see who was subpoenaed ?

The e case site posted a few pages back. Or just search Fairfax County Circuit Court e- case.

Anonymous wrote:Why is the angle on the panic attack. I agree that the question is inappropriate and a typical defense ploy, but why would it help. What doesn’t explain away. Sure, I would have a panic attack too if I just murdered someone.

My guess is to show that he was overwhelmed. Obviously the defense will say it’s grief. He only asked about her once as far as I can see. At no point during the 911 call do you hear him calling out her name or any of the other things one might expect. Doesn’t seem to express a great deal of concern about his daughter. Sort of a “where is my daughter? Oh she ok!” And that’s the end of his concern. So the defense will likely say he didn’t do the kind of things one might expect because he was having a panic attack.

Wait, they said CB was wearing glasses on her head? Could she have slept like this? Wouldn’t that be a sign she was awake and aware?

Why is the angle on the panic attack. I agree that the question is inappropriate and a typical defense ploy, but why would it help. What doesn’t explain away. Sure, I would have a panic attack too if I just murdered someone.

Butcher knife killer=BB

Where can we see who was subpoenaed ?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can’t believe that the prosecutor keeps letting them use the term “panic attack”.

I have a request, since many of us are not able to watch live. Would it be possible to add some more context? Who are they saying Had a panic attack, Juliana?

Brandon... the defense keeps trying to ask the police about did they see the panic attack, did they hear the panic attack, where were they when he was having a panic attack... smh

Anonymous wrote:Can’t believe that the prosecutor keeps letting them use the term “panic attack”.

I have a request, since many of us are not able to watch live. Would it be possible to add some more context? Who are they saying Had a panic attack, Juliana?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet Tess is squirming in her seat. Brendan’s lawyer is a joke.

Tess is not in the gallery . Just Christine’s parents and another lady, possibly a sister?

She's probably on the witness list.

Yes, she was subpoenaed.

Anonymous wrote:Any new evidence come to light today?

Did BB attorney in his opening offer any ideas on who the real killer is then?

The latest police officer said that the blood seemed to have been there awhile (soaked into the carpet and some of I think Christine’s coagulating a bit) implying that they didn’t call right away.

Any new evidence come to light today?

Did BB attorney in his opening offer any ideas on who the real killer is then?

Can’t believe that the prosecutor keeps letting them use the term “panic attack”.

Anonymous wrote:I bet Tess is squirming in her seat. Brendan’s lawyer is a joke.

He really is. This “aw shucks, what number officer were you into the house?” Nonsense is getting old.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet Tess is squirming in her seat. Brendan’s lawyer is a joke.

Tess is not in the gallery . Just Christine’s parents and another lady, possibly a sister?

She's probably on the witness list.

Anonymous wrote:I bet Tess is squirming in her seat. Brendan’s lawyer is a joke.

Tess is not in the gallery . Just Christine’s parents and another lady, possibly a sister?