Anonymous
09/21/2025 17:19
Subject: Re:The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's got a harem? A HimYum?
I'm probably going to mess this up but I'll try.
https://www.instagram.com/kimberlyguilfoyle/p/DMAjW0ks24o/
Oh gosh. Her hair. And that AI-edited picture.
At least her outfit is somewhat normal?
Why is she doing this to herself? She’s another one who could look so good.
It's the hair and eye makeup. Cut her hair to shoulder length, lose the black eye. She'd be gorgeous.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 17:18
Subject: Re:The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:She's got a harem? A HimYum?
I'm probably going to mess this up but I'll try.
https://www.instagram.com/kimberlyguilfoyle/p/DMAjW0ks24o/
At least one of those is probably her son.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 17:02
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the List had an entire article on Usha's horrible shoes. We have already discussed almost all of these.
https://www.thelist.com/1862422/usha-vance-footwear-fashion-fails-rival-senior-citizen-sneakers/
In the pic at the top of the article, Usha's hair looks amazing (if she dyed it and had this style it would be a knock out the park--30s is too young to succumb to gray hair)
The article picked the worst pics to show her shoes you could barely see them.
Didn't go to the link this time but I think I know which pic that was, with her hair styled. I thought the style was great and lively.
I cannot accept this woman hasn't even turned 40 yet. WTF happened?! She has melanin but the skin of a blue eyed blonde who spent the past 40 years sunscreenless on a beach in South Florida. It's unreal.
I agree she doesn't look 39 but in her defense I think some of the skin discoloration may be pregnancy melasma. Women of color are more prone to it and their youngest is two or three at most. She barely does basic grooming, I could see the treatments to fix melasma not being high on her radar.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 16:47
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the List had an entire article on Usha's horrible shoes. We have already discussed almost all of these.
https://www.thelist.com/1862422/usha-vance-footwear-fashion-fails-rival-senior-citizen-sneakers/
In the pic at the top of the article, Usha's hair looks amazing (if she dyed it and had this style it would be a knock out the park--30s is too young to succumb to gray hair)
The article picked the worst pics to show her shoes you could barely see them.
Didn't go to the link this time but I think I know which pic that was, with her hair styled. I thought the style was great and lively.
I cannot accept this woman hasn't even turned 40 yet. WTF happened?! She has melanin but the skin of a blue eyed blonde who spent the past 40 years sunscreenless on a beach in South Florida. It's unreal.
She probably spent tons of time outside in Southern California. Lots of brown people have been telling you that we age, despite lots of posts around here to the contrary. I don’t know why you are surprised.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 16:43
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the List had an entire article on Usha's horrible shoes. We have already discussed almost all of these.
https://www.thelist.com/1862422/usha-vance-footwear-fashion-fails-rival-senior-citizen-sneakers/
In the pic at the top of the article, Usha's hair looks amazing (if she dyed it and had this style it would be a knock out the park--30s is too young to succumb to gray hair)
The article picked the worst pics to show her shoes you could barely see them.
Didn't go to the link this time but I think I know which pic that was, with her hair styled. I thought the style was great and lively.
I cannot accept this woman hasn't even turned 40 yet. WTF happened?! She has melanin but the skin of a blue eyed blonde who spent the past 40 years sunscreenless on a beach in South Florida. It's unreal.
Her skin is not that bad. It's only the bags under her eyes, which is more likely exhaustion and hydration.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 16:39
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the List had an entire article on Usha's horrible shoes. We have already discussed almost all of these.
https://www.thelist.com/1862422/usha-vance-footwear-fashion-fails-rival-senior-citizen-sneakers/
In the pic at the top of the article, Usha's hair looks amazing (if she dyed it and had this style it would be a knock out the park--30s is too young to succumb to gray hair)
The article picked the worst pics to show her shoes you could barely see them.
Didn't go to the link this time but I think I know which pic that was, with her hair styled. I thought the style was great and lively.
I cannot accept this woman hasn't even turned 40 yet. WTF happened?! She has melanin but the skin of a blue eyed blonde who spent the past 40 years sunscreenless on a beach in South Florida. It's unreal.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 16:33
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Royalty/US crossover - This time with that man, Usha, and the Crown Prince and Princess of Jordan. Usha looks... fine. Appropriate. She is being out-fashioned by Rajwa.
I am her biggest hater but this is...fine
The top looks like a shell (not a seashell but the kind of base layer of clothing called a "shell"), looks like it needs a blazer, cardigan, wrap, scarf or something to complete the look.
No, it's blissfully simple.
Simple would have been a sleeveless sweater or sleeveless silk knit top with an interesting neckline. Not a shell in woven polyester that is obviously meant to be worn under something.
I bet you're the poster who always advocates "nice slacks, a lovely silk scarf, and a spritz of perfume" when people ask for clothing advice. Her top is obviously silk, not polyester.
No, it is not obviously silk, it doesn't look like silk (and yes different fabrics have different looks, another example, an acrylic sweater does not look wool).
Your "I bet" doesn't make any sense...when you are prone to put words in people's mouths, of course you think you know what they will say in random circumstances
Sorry, her top was definitely silk. But thanks for the lecture about different fabrics looking different, I had no idea!
NP, but I would say questionable. I can see her bra through it on one side, which doesn’t normally happen with a silk shell and is most unfortunate. You would think they would photoshop that out?
This is silly. Unless it's very cheap poly, you can't tell the difference in a picture at this resolution. There is also a lot of low quality silk and high quality poly these days.
Yes, you can tell the difference. The sheen, drape, texture are different between the two.
Do you all think this might be the blouse: https://www.brooksbrothers.com/sleeveless-shell-in-washable-silk/WV01334.html
No the neckline on this one has a very slight roll
Anonymous
09/21/2025 16:11
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Royalty/US crossover - This time with that man, Usha, and the Crown Prince and Princess of Jordan. Usha looks... fine. Appropriate. She is being out-fashioned by Rajwa.
I am her biggest hater but this is...fine
The top looks like a shell (not a seashell but the kind of base layer of clothing called a "shell"), looks like it needs a blazer, cardigan, wrap, scarf or something to complete the look.
No, it's blissfully simple.
Simple would have been a sleeveless sweater or sleeveless silk knit top with an interesting neckline. Not a shell in woven polyester that is obviously meant to be worn under something.
I bet you're the poster who always advocates "nice slacks, a lovely silk scarf, and a spritz of perfume" when people ask for clothing advice. Her top is obviously silk, not polyester.
No, it is not obviously silk, it doesn't look like silk (and yes different fabrics have different looks, another example, an acrylic sweater does not look wool).
Your "I bet" doesn't make any sense...when you are prone to put words in people's mouths, of course you think you know what they will say in random circumstances
Sorry, her top was definitely silk. But thanks for the lecture about different fabrics looking different, I had no idea!
NP, but I would say questionable. I can see her bra through it on one side, which doesn’t normally happen with a silk shell and is most unfortunate. You would think they would photoshop that out?
This is silly. Unless it's very cheap poly, you can't tell the difference in a picture at this resolution. There is also a lot of low quality silk and high quality poly these days.
Yes, you can tell the difference. The sheen, drape, texture are different between the two.
Do you all think this might be the blouse: https://www.brooksbrothers.com/sleeveless-shell-in-washable-silk/WV01334.html
I don't think so, it appears to be a set that was sold together.
I checked Usha's fashion fan accounts on IG that track her outfits and where she bought them (they mostly post AI-edited pics of her where she actually looks good) but they don't have any intel
Intereesting. Usha's outfit didn't look particularly matchy to me. But looking at her photo and the BB top, the BB top is a little bit more interesting with the piping and flattering with the slight cut in on the sleeves instead of the straight cut arm hole.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 16:07
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Royalty/US crossover - This time with that man, Usha, and the Crown Prince and Princess of Jordan. Usha looks... fine. Appropriate. She is being out-fashioned by Rajwa.
I am her biggest hater but this is...fine
The top looks like a shell (not a seashell but the kind of base layer of clothing called a "shell"), looks like it needs a blazer, cardigan, wrap, scarf or something to complete the look.
No, it's blissfully simple.
Simple would have been a sleeveless sweater or sleeveless silk knit top with an interesting neckline. Not a shell in woven polyester that is obviously meant to be worn under something.
I bet you're the poster who always advocates "nice slacks, a lovely silk scarf, and a spritz of perfume" when people ask for clothing advice. Her top is obviously silk, not polyester.
No, it is not obviously silk, it doesn't look like silk (and yes different fabrics have different looks, another example, an acrylic sweater does not look wool).
Your "I bet" doesn't make any sense...when you are prone to put words in people's mouths, of course you think you know what they will say in random circumstances
Sorry, her top was definitely silk. But thanks for the lecture about different fabrics looking different, I had no idea!
NP, but I would say questionable. I can see her bra through it on one side, which doesn’t normally happen with a silk shell and is most unfortunate. You would think they would photoshop that out?
This is silly. Unless it's very cheap poly, you can't tell the difference in a picture at this resolution. There is also a lot of low quality silk and high quality poly these days.
Yes, you can tell the difference. The sheen, drape, texture are different between the two.
Do you all think this might be the blouse: https://www.brooksbrothers.com/sleeveless-shell-in-washable-silk/WV01334.html
I don't think so, it appears to be a set that was sold together.
I checked Usha's fashion fan accounts on IG that track her outfits and where she bought them (they mostly post AI-edited pics of her where she actually looks good) but they don't have any intel
Anonymous
09/21/2025 13:29
Subject: The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Royalty/US crossover - This time with that man, Usha, and the Crown Prince and Princess of Jordan. Usha looks... fine. Appropriate. She is being out-fashioned by Rajwa.
I am her biggest hater but this is...fine
The top looks like a shell (not a seashell but the kind of base layer of clothing called a "shell"), looks like it needs a blazer, cardigan, wrap, scarf or something to complete the look.
No, it's blissfully simple.
Simple would have been a sleeveless sweater or sleeveless silk knit top with an interesting neckline. Not a shell in woven polyester that is obviously meant to be worn under something.
I bet you're the poster who always advocates "nice slacks, a lovely silk scarf, and a spritz of perfume" when people ask for clothing advice. Her top is obviously silk, not polyester.
No, it is not obviously silk, it doesn't look like silk (and yes different fabrics have different looks, another example, an acrylic sweater does not look wool).
Your "I bet" doesn't make any sense...when you are prone to put words in people's mouths, of course you think you know what they will say in random circumstances
Sorry, her top was definitely silk. But thanks for the lecture about different fabrics looking different, I had no idea!
NP, but I would say questionable. I can see her bra through it on one side, which doesn’t normally happen with a silk shell and is most unfortunate. You would think they would photoshop that out?
This is silly. Unless it's very cheap poly, you can't tell the difference in a picture at this resolution. There is also a lot of low quality silk and high quality poly these days.
Yes, you can tell the difference. The sheen, drape, texture are different between the two.
Do you all think this might be the blouse: https://www.brooksbrothers.com/sleeveless-shell-in-washable-silk/WV01334.html
Anonymous
09/21/2025 13:09
Subject: Re:The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:She's got a harem? A HimYum?
I'm probably going to mess this up but I'll try.
https://www.instagram.com/kimberlyguilfoyle/p/DMAjW0ks24o/
Oh gosh. Her hair. And that AI-edited picture.
At least her outfit is somewhat normal?
Why is she doing this to herself? She’s another one who could look so good.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 12:45
Subject: Re:The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Royalty/US crossover - This time with that man, Usha, and the Crown Prince and Princess of Jordan. Usha looks... fine. Appropriate. She is being out-fashioned by Rajwa.
I am her biggest hater but this is...fine
The top looks like a shell (not a seashell but the kind of base layer of clothing called a "shell"), looks like it needs a blazer, cardigan, wrap, scarf or something to complete the look.
No, it's blissfully simple.
Simple would have been a sleeveless sweater or sleeveless silk knit top with an interesting neckline. Not a shell in woven polyester that is obviously meant to be worn under something.
I bet you're the poster who always advocates "nice slacks, a lovely silk scarf, and a spritz of perfume" when people ask for clothing advice. Her top is obviously silk, not polyester.
No, it is not obviously silk, it doesn't look like silk (and yes different fabrics have different looks, another example, an acrylic sweater does not look wool).
Your "I bet" doesn't make any sense...when you are prone to put words in people's mouths, of course you think you know what they will say in random circumstances
Sorry, her top was definitely silk. But thanks for the lecture about different fabrics looking different, I had no idea!
NP, but I would say questionable. I can see her bra through it on one side, which doesn’t normally happen with a silk shell and is most unfortunate. You would think they would photoshop that out?
This is silly. Unless it's very cheap poly, you can't tell the difference in a picture at this resolution. There is also a lot of low quality silk and high quality poly these days.
Yes, you can tell the difference. The sheen, drape, texture are different between the two.
Annnd, she’s back. The poster who thinks she - and only she - knows about clothing, fabrics, drape, etc. Some of us are looking at her blouse and know perfectly well that it’s silk. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.
No one said they are the only one who knows. They just said you are incorrect, even if you think you know something perfectly well. Two different things. If you are agreeable to disagreeing you wouldn’t feel the need to insult or do psychological analysis of those who disagree with you.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 12:19
Subject: Re:The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:She's got a harem? A HimYum?
I'm probably going to mess this up but I'll try.
https://www.instagram.com/kimberlyguilfoyle/p/DMAjW0ks24o/
At least one of them is her son.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 12:16
Subject: Re:The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Royalty/US crossover - This time with that man, Usha, and the Crown Prince and Princess of Jordan. Usha looks... fine. Appropriate. She is being out-fashioned by Rajwa.
I am her biggest hater but this is...fine
The top looks like a shell (not a seashell but the kind of base layer of clothing called a "shell"), looks like it needs a blazer, cardigan, wrap, scarf or something to complete the look.
No, it's blissfully simple.
Simple would have been a sleeveless sweater or sleeveless silk knit top with an interesting neckline. Not a shell in woven polyester that is obviously meant to be worn under something.
I bet you're the poster who always advocates "nice slacks, a lovely silk scarf, and a spritz of perfume" when people ask for clothing advice. Her top is obviously silk, not polyester.
No, it is not obviously silk, it doesn't look like silk (and yes different fabrics have different looks, another example, an acrylic sweater does not look wool).
Your "I bet" doesn't make any sense...when you are prone to put words in people's mouths, of course you think you know what they will say in random circumstances
Sorry, her top was definitely silk. But thanks for the lecture about different fabrics looking different, I had no idea!
NP, but I would say questionable. I can see her bra through it on one side, which doesn’t normally happen with a silk shell and is most unfortunate. You would think they would photoshop that out?
This is silly. Unless it's very cheap poly, you can't tell the difference in a picture at this resolution. There is also a lot of low quality silk and high quality poly these days.
Yes, you can tell the difference. The sheen, drape, texture are different between the two.
Annnd, she’s back. The poster who thinks she - and only she - knows about clothing, fabrics, drape, etc. Some of us are looking at her blouse and know perfectly well that it’s silk. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.
Anonymous
09/21/2025 11:59
Subject: Re:The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's got a harem? A HimYum?
I'm probably going to mess this up but I'll try.
https://www.instagram.com/kimberlyguilfoyle/p/DMAjW0ks24o/
Dammmmmit.. It's Kimmie with two very young men who I do not recognize, in a hearing room wearing an '80s power suit.
One is her son. The other looks like a younger version of Don Jr.