Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question for all the Virginia lawyers/legal experts following this case: It's very likely that production companies will reach out to Juliana to tell her story, with some offering money. Is this legal? Does Virginia have some version of the "Son of Sam" law? (a NY law which prohibits anyone from profiting off of a murder that they were part of).

reputable production companies within the US wont pay her. However there are many that are not. They don't have to pay her within Virginia, many of the less reputable companies are actually from other countries, and they are not under legal restriction of the Virginia laws. They likely can and will pay her outside of the state so it doesnt matter what the Virginia law says even. There are loop holes these companies could utilize.

Wow...thank for answering my question

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question for all the Virginia lawyers/legal experts following this case: It's very likely that production companies will reach out to Juliana to tell her story, with some offering money. Is this legal? Does Virginia have some version of the "Son of Sam" law? (a NY law which prohibits anyone from profiting off of a murder that they were part of).

reputable production companies within the US wont pay her. However there are many that are not. They don't have to pay her within Virginia, many of the less reputable companies are actually from other countries, and they are not under legal restriction of the Virginia laws. They likely can and will pay her outside of the state so it doesnt matter what the Virginia law says even. There are loop holes these companies could utilize.

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know who the woman is in this video being interviewed? It just says "a victim's relative". Is this maybe Joe Ryan's mother?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e90k5VryuyE

Anonymous wrote:Question for all the Virginia lawyers/legal experts following this case: It's very likely that production companies will reach out to Juliana to tell her story, with some offering money. Is this legal? Does Virginia have some version of the "Son of Sam" law? (a NY law which prohibits anyone from profiting off of a murder that they were part of).

Anonymous wrote:Question for all the Virginia lawyers/legal experts following this case: It's very likely that production companies will reach out to Juliana to tell her story, with some offering money. Is this legal? Does Virginia have some version of the "Son of Sam" law? (a NY law which prohibits anyone from profiting off of a murder that they were part of).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Theresa had custody of the child this whole time? Have they been living in the family home or did she take the child to NJ?

The child lives in the murder house with Tess and the great grandmother.

How on earth did Christine’s family not get custody?

she got custody so quickly because she was living in the house at the time of Brandons arrest for sometime. So in order for the court system to move the child from her home and an established caregiver they have to prove abuse on Tess's part. Thats a hard bar to reach. Even Brandon still had custody with no charges until he was arrested and taken to jail. Just the way child custody works its tough to get a child away from those that have been watching her, where she lives. I hope one day the little girl finds a much much better home and people to care for her. That may happen after the trial for Brandon if hes found guilty. There are charges against him for child endangerment. It was tacked on by the state after he had other charges served. They do want to save that little girl but it is all dependent how this trial plays out. Who knows Tess may still get charges brought up by the state after Brandons trial for threatening Jullianna. They have evidence but they have the burden of proof which is harder than just having evidence. If she is charged with that it does open a door for her criminally and it might even help to remove the little girl from her care. We can only hope in this case that all happens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Theresa had custody of the child this whole time? Have they been living in the family home or did she take the child to NJ?

The child lives in the murder house with Tess and the great grandmother.

How on earth did Christine’s family not get custody?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Brendan’s mother and father had an humanity they would have cut him off financially and made him use a public defender. You two and your “followers” are delusional trash. I hope you all rot!

Not only did they not do the right thing and make him get a public defender and publically denounce him for the killer and rotten person that he was, they doubled down, and openly his mother harassed Joe’s family, and she big momma posted that Joe was a butter knife killer on her social media. They continued Brendan’s lie and brutalizing Joe, and his family after the fact. I hope that his mom get what is coming for her even if only on a karmic level. They are not worth even typing about, they just are horrible people just like their son is.

As a mom whose kid did something unthinkable, I think you can’t comprehend where your mind can go to convince you you didn’t raise a monster. It takes a lot of time. I’m not justifying BB’s mom, but I understand how she could be in such denial. BB is guilty and eventually his mom will come to realize who she raised.

It seems like a lot of women here aren’t moms, or think that if something terrible happened they would be thinking completely rational. This train of thought is just disconnected with reality.

Theresa knows for certain the guilt of her son. She doesn’t live in some delusional world. And that makes her putting Brendan before not only his victims but her granddaughter, that much worse. What goes around comes around Tess.

+1 there was no denying it in her mind. She knew exactly what he did, which is why she threatened Juliana while she was in prison.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Brendan’s mother and father had an humanity they would have cut him off financially and made him use a public defender. You two and your “followers” are delusional trash. I hope you all rot!

Not only did they not do the right thing and make him get a public defender and publically denounce him for the killer and rotten person that he was, they doubled down, and openly his mother harassed Joe’s family, and she big momma posted that Joe was a butter knife killer on her social media. They continued Brendan’s lie and brutalizing Joe, and his family after the fact. I hope that his mom get what is coming for her even if only on a karmic level. They are not worth even typing about, they just are horrible people just like their son is.

As a mom whose kid did something unthinkable, I think you can’t comprehend where your mind can go to convince you you didn’t raise a monster. It takes a lot of time. I’m not justifying BB’s mom, but I understand how she could be in such denial. BB is guilty and eventually his mom will come to realize who she raised.

It seems like a lot of women here aren’t moms, or think that if something terrible happened they would be thinking completely rational. This train of thought is just disconnected with reality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Theresa had custody of the child this whole time? Have they been living in the family home or did she take the child to NJ?

The child lives in the murder house with Tess and the great grandmother.