Anonymous wrote:In the news: Prince Andrew hosted Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Harvey Weinstein at Royal Lodge, the prince's private home in the grounds of Windsor Castle.
![]()
The trio visited the Windsor mansion as part of his daughter Beatrice's masked ball 18th birthday celebrations in 2006, two months after a US arrest warrant had been issued for Epstein for the sexual assault of a minor.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g7d39n6vgo
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where were all of you - Rs and Ds - when Clinton's name came up agains during Hillary's run?
"I'm with her [the pedo lover]."
Hypocrites, all of you who didn't stand up for the children then either
Was Clinton accused of being a pedo? Is it in the Epstein files? If only they'd release the files so we can be sure.
I think PP is accusing HRC of loving a pedo (Bill). Meaning... she is guilty of having a bad husband? Better that than voting for an actual known pedo!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where were all of you - Rs and Ds - when Clinton's name came up agains during Hillary's run?
"I'm with her [the pedo lover]."
Hypocrites, all of you who didn't stand up for the children then either
Was Clinton accused of being a pedo? Is it in the Epstein files? If only they'd release the files so we can be sure.
I think PP is accusing HRC of loving a pedo (Bill). Meaning... she is guilty of having a bad husband? Better that than voting for an actual known pedo!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where were all of you - Rs and Ds - when Clinton's name came up agains during Hillary's run?
"I'm with her [the pedo lover]."
Hypocrites, all of you who didn't stand up for the children then either
Was Clinton accused of being a pedo? Is it in the Epstein files? If only they'd release the files so we can be sure.
Anonymous wrote:Where were all of you - Rs and Ds - when Clinton's name came up agains during Hillary's run?
"I'm with her [the pedo lover]."
Hypocrites, all of you who didn't stand up for the children then either
Remind again, who was she running against?Anonymous wrote:Where were all of you - Rs and Ds - when Clinton's name came up agains during Hillary's run?
"I'm with her [the pedo lover]."
Hypocrites, all of you who didn't stand up for the children then either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What will happen once Democrats have enough votes? How likely is it that somebody or agency can just not release them? As with everything else this year, norms are not being adhered to, so how can we be sure it would actually be released?
Once dems have the votes in the house, that doesn’t mean they will actually get released. Thune can still stall the bill in the senate and then Trump can veto.
So does Johnson just not want to have on the books that the GOP voted it down? It sounds like even if the House passes it, it is going to be denied anyway.
Delay until after the midterms is the goal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What will happen once Democrats have enough votes? How likely is it that somebody or agency can just not release them? As with everything else this year, norms are not being adhered to, so how can we be sure it would actually be released?
Once dems have the votes in the house, that doesn’t mean they will actually get released. Thune can still stall the bill in the senate and then Trump can veto.
So does Johnson just not want to have on the books that the GOP voted it down? It sounds like even if the House passes it, it is going to be denied anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What will happen once Democrats have enough votes? How likely is it that somebody or agency can just not release them? As with everything else this year, norms are not being adhered to, so how can we be sure it would actually be released?
Once dems have the votes in the house, that doesn’t mean they will actually get released. Thune can still stall the bill in the senate and then Trump can veto.
Anonymous wrote:What will happen once Democrats have enough votes? How likely is it that somebody or agency can just not release them? As with everything else this year, norms are not being adhered to, so how can we be sure it would actually be released?
Anonymous wrote:What will happen once Democrats have enough votes? How likely is it that somebody or agency can just not release them? As with everything else this year, norms are not being adhered to, so how can we be sure it would actually be released?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Little reminder about the people we are talking about:
https://open.substack.com/pub/ellieleonard/p/the-farmer-sisters?r=nfz7g&utm_medium=ios
RELEASE the effing unredacted files!
Seriously I thought MAGA was all about "saving the children"![]()