Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like SeekingArrangement is scrambling to hide, bury evidence and deny everything. FBI should have been in there with a forensic team to image their servers the second they made the connection.
How do you know the FBI hasn't done this?
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/23/gaetz-case-takes-bizarre-tabloid-turn-500692
“Seeking.com has no knowledge of Mr. Gaetz ever having an account on the website,” the company said in its statement.
Some defense lawyers involved in the wide-ranging case, however, speculate that the federal investigation into Gaetz has stalled for a lack of clear evidence and because of the problematic witnesses in the case: Greenberg and his former victim, who is now 21 and makes hardcore pornography.
Perhaps there is nothing to this story other than rumors of rabid liberals.
Anonymous wrote:Lol does anyone think he actually had “Matt Gaetz” on the website? Of course not. If he was on it, he’d use an alias. Further, it was Greenberg who was active on the website. This is a red herring.
Still, he was doing ecstasy and banging hookers in hotels parties arranged by Greenberg while he was Congressman. Illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Looks like SeekingArrangement is scrambling to hide, bury evidence and deny everything. FBI should have been in there with a forensic team to image their servers the second they made the connection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: why hasn’t Gaetz been indicted yet?
Any day now!
Anonymous wrote:Serious question: why hasn’t Gaetz been indicted yet?
Anonymous wrote:Fellow democrats, learn from this one.
Slimy republicans rarely "do the right thing" and resign, don't cave for these people.
Anonymous wrote:Even Newsmax didn't want him,
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/newsmax-turned-down-embattled-republican-matt-gaetz-job-spokesperson-2021-06-07/
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/LO4OJ2TYQNIELBTUSV2UQRM5M4.jpg)