Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

Really? You can't think of any good reasons why he may not want to bow to her every demand?

I can think of dozens. Beginning with.... she is a loon.

+1
Of all people with questionable tales and motives... E. Jean Carroll is at the top of the list.

The judge requiring Trump’s DNA disagreed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s stop making excuses for Joe Biden.

Maybe we should stop making excuses for Tara Reade instead?

Tara now reports she’s getting death threats.
This whole thing demands a through investigation,
no question at this point.

Going to keep posting this until I get an answer.

You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

The University of DE records he refuses access to. What is he hiding?

So you think there’s a personnel record of a sexual assault in his personal papers that he wasn’t even required to keep, that he voluntarily gave to a university archive? Are you daft?

We don’t know do we? Why is he blocking it if there’s nothing to hide?

So you are daft. He’s “blocking” it because no one ever releases papers like that while they’re still in public life. That archive is probably full of classified stuff since he was VP.

Just like you insist on Trump tax returns, even though there’s no law requiring them. I’m just using your logic, there must be "something to hide"

Uh, there is a law requiring them, but like everthing else, it is being ignored. See the legal filings.

This. The fact that you don't know that there is a law specifically requiring the IRS to give Trump's tax returns to Congress upon request tells everyone how entirely uninformed you are.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/why-the-irs-is-legally-required-to-give-congress-trumps-tax-returns-but-probably-wont

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s stop making excuses for Joe Biden.

Maybe we should stop making excuses for Tara Reade instead?

Tara now reports she’s getting death threats.
This whole thing demands a through investigation,
no question at this point.

Going to keep posting this until I get an answer.

You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

The University of DE records he refuses access to. What is he hiding?

So you think there’s a personnel record of a sexual assault in his personal papers that he wasn’t even required to keep, that he voluntarily gave to a university archive? Are you daft?

We don’t know do we? Why is he blocking it if there’s nothing to hide?

So you are daft. He’s “blocking” it because no one ever releases papers like that while they’re still in public life. That archive is probably full of classified stuff since he was VP.

Just like you insist on Trump tax returns, even though there’s no law requiring them. I’m just using your logic, there must be "something to hide"

+1

Cool
Let’s have trump had over his tax returns. Let’s hear from all the witnesses he hid from impeachment while we’re at it.
And we’ll let some reporters dig through Delaware. Deal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh, we have one old rapey smarter geezer taking on an old rapey stupid corrupt geezer who is currently president.

I voting for the smart rapey one, who will probably only serve one term anyhow and won't be as corrupt.

If the republican party of "conservative and family values" can vote in a corrupt rapist as president....

This, exactly. The puregressives are always attacking the Democrats for not living up to their purpoted ideals, never mind the GOP touting themselves as the party of "family values" and "pro life" while 67,000+ people and counting have died in 2 months from a pandemic that their administration is in denial of.

Deflect!

+ a million
They are truly masters of deflection.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s stop making excuses for Joe Biden.

Maybe we should stop making excuses for Tara Reade instead?

Tara now reports she’s getting death threats.
This whole thing demands a through investigation,
no question at this point.

Going to keep posting this until I get an answer.

You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

The University of DE records he refuses access to. What is he hiding?

So you think there’s a personnel record of a sexual assault in his personal papers that he wasn’t even required to keep, that he voluntarily gave to a university archive? Are you daft?

We don’t know do we? Why is he blocking it if there’s nothing to hide?

So you are daft. He’s “blocking” it because no one ever releases papers like that while they’re still in public life. That archive is probably full of classified stuff since he was VP.

Just like you insist on Trump tax returns, even though there’s no law requiring them. I’m just using your logic, there must be "something to hide"

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

Really? You can't think of any good reasons why he may not want to bow to her every demand?

I can think of dozens. Beginning with.... she is a loon.

+1
Of all people with questionable tales and motives... E. Jean Carroll is at the top of the list.

She has the dress. A little dna sample should clear this right up.

Anonymous wrote:It's getting hard to defend Biden with all of these videos of him making little girls uncomfortable. Can't we get Cuomo in there somehow?

Making little girls feel uncomfortable is not a crime. We have videos of Trump making millions of people uncomfortable every day.

No we can't have Cuomo. Biden won the primaries, therefore he is the nominee. Sorry. That's democracy. Nobody ever said the primary system would turn out a guaranteed winner. Cuomo's no guarantee either. I'm sure the Republican's can find some women to say he looked at them funny or something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

Really? You can't think of any good reasons why he may not want to bow to her every demand?

I can think of dozens. Beginning with.... she is a loon.

+1
Of all people with questionable tales and motives... E. Jean Carroll is at the top of the list.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s stop making excuses for Joe Biden.

Maybe we should stop making excuses for Tara Reade instead?

Tara now reports she’s getting death threats.
This whole thing demands a through investigation,
no question at this point.

Going to keep posting this until I get an answer.

You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

The University of DE records he refuses access to. What is he hiding?

So you think there’s a personnel record of a sexual assault in his personal papers that he wasn’t even required to keep, that he voluntarily gave to a university archive? Are you daft?

We don’t know do we? Why is he blocking it if there’s nothing to hide?

So you are daft. He’s “blocking” it because no one ever releases papers like that while they’re still in public life. That archive is probably full of classified stuff since he was VP.

Just like you insist on Trump tax returns, even though there’s no law requiring them. I’m just using your logic, there must be "something to hide"

That's Trump's logic. Fifty years of precedent had candidates release tax returns. In 2012, Trump wasn't releasing his returns because he had something to hide. When Romney released his returns, indeed the information in it was used against him. Then Trump refused to release his returns and won anyway. So, really, the new rule is that you are just better off hiding everything, whether there is anything there or not. And your opponents are best off forcing it out of you.

Anonymous wrote:There is a concerted and coordinated effort to smear Biden with these sexual stories. To wit

The kicker on this one, Biden was not at the event in question, and that has been verified on many different levels in the hours since this "surfaced," but it is pretty telling WHO is starting and spreading these lies.

This just got better, the alleged vicitm "changed" dates, except...

Biden wasn't there for that date either.

Two strikes and your out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s stop making excuses for Joe Biden.

Maybe we should stop making excuses for Tara Reade instead?

Tara now reports she’s getting death threats.
This whole thing demands a through investigation,
no question at this point.

Going to keep posting this until I get an answer.

You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

The University of DE records he refuses access to. What is he hiding?

So you think there’s a personnel record of a sexual assault in his personal papers that he wasn’t even required to keep, that he voluntarily gave to a university archive? Are you daft?

We don’t know do we? Why is he blocking it if there’s nothing to hide?

So you are daft. He’s “blocking” it because no one ever releases papers like that while they’re still in public life. That archive is probably full of classified stuff since he was VP.

Just like you insist on Trump tax returns, even though there’s no law requiring them. I’m just using your logic, there must be "something to hide"

Uh, there is a law requiring them, but like everthing else, it is being ignored. See the legal filings.

Anonymous wrote:Now Katie Halper is deleting her tweets. Credibility blown.

The original ones with the Reade interview?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s stop making excuses for Joe Biden.

Maybe we should stop making excuses for Tara Reade instead?

Tara now reports she’s getting death threats.
This whole thing demands a through investigation,
no question at this point.

Going to keep posting this until I get an answer.

You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

The University of DE records he refuses access to. What is he hiding?

So you think there’s a personnel record of a sexual assault in his personal papers that he wasn’t even required to keep, that he voluntarily gave to a university archive? Are you daft?

We don’t know do we? Why is he blocking it if there’s nothing to hide?

So you are daft. He’s “blocking” it because no one ever releases papers like that while they’re still in public life. That archive is probably full of classified stuff since he was VP.

Just like you insist on Trump tax returns, even though there’s no law requiring them. I’m just using your logic, there must be "something to hide"

There is a law requiring Trump to release his tax returns, fool. The tax code provides that Congress’ tax committees—including the House Committee on Ways and Means, the Senate Committee on Finance, and the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT)—are entitled to obtain any tax returns from the IRS that they request. 3 Section 6103(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) reads:
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary [of the Treasury] shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh, we have one old rapey smarter geezer taking on an old rapey stupid corrupt geezer who is currently president.

I voting for the smart rapey one, who will probably only serve one term anyhow and won't be as corrupt.

If the republican party of "conservative and family values" can vote in a corrupt rapist as president....

This, exactly. The puregressives are always attacking the Democrats for not living up to their purpoted ideals, never mind the GOP touting themselves as the party of "family values" and "pro life" while 67,000+ people and counting have died in 2 months from a pandemic that their administration is in denial of.

Deflect!

Anonymous wrote:Eh, we have one old rapey smarter geezer taking on an old rapey stupid corrupt geezer who is currently president.

I voting for the smart rapey one, who will probably only serve one term anyhow and won't be as corrupt.

If the republican party of "conservative and family values" can vote in a corrupt rapist as president....

This, exactly. The puregressives are always attacking the Democrats for not living up to their purpoted ideals, never mind the GOP touting themselves as the party of "family values" and "pro life" while 67,000+ people and counting have died in 2 months from a pandemic that their administration is in denial of.