Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would suggest that as "we are all in this together", all gvt employees should take a minimum of 10% salary cut.
(I'd say 5% for low salaries, up to 25% for everyone with higher salaries).
Everyone else is taking pay-cut so it seems only fair.

Then maybe, we will hear a bit more of "let's open back sooner"...

When I think of how loud CS are complaining when the gvt shut down when they KNOW they'll get paid back-pay,
I find the "let's stay close until we find a vaccine" crowd repulsive.

I don’t know of anyone saying to shut down until we find a vaccine.

At any rate you know of we open up before there is testing for everyone and adequate PPE the economy is going to shut down anyway when too many get sick and can’t go to work.

And you personally WILL lose a loved one, you realize that right? Who are you willing to sacrifice?

One of my mother's best friend's died yesterday with Coronavirus. She was in her 80s, lived in New Rochelle, and had serious heart issues, for which she had been hospitalized frequently as of late.

If you are giving me a choice between a woman in her 80s with a serious co-morbidity that was going to kill her within a year and a child starving to death due to lockdowns, I'm choosing the former.

Now do all the young people with co-morbid conditions that will die or be harmed by letting the virus run amok.

All those young people will have no future with no economy.

How much of an economy will we have with the virus running amok?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would suggest that as "we are all in this together", all gvt employees should take a minimum of 10% salary cut.
(I'd say 5% for low salaries, up to 25% for everyone with higher salaries).
Everyone else is taking pay-cut so it seems only fair.

Then maybe, we will hear a bit more of "let's open back sooner"...

When I think of how loud CS are complaining when the gvt shut down when they KNOW they'll get paid back-pay,
I find the "let's stay close until we find a vaccine" crowd repulsive.

I don’t know of anyone saying to shut down until we find a vaccine.

At any rate you know of we open up before there is testing for everyone and adequate PPE the economy is going to shut down anyway when too many get sick and can’t go to work.

And you personally WILL lose a loved one, you realize that right? Who are you willing to sacrifice?

One of my mother's best friend's died yesterday with Coronavirus. She was in her 80s, lived in New Rochelle, and had serious heart issues, for which she had been hospitalized frequently as of late.

If you are giving me a choice between a woman in her 80s with a serious co-morbidity that was going to kill her within a year and a child starving to death due to lockdowns, I'm choosing the former.

Now do all the young people with co-morbid conditions that will die or be harmed by letting the virus run amok.

All those young people will have no future with no economy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another day, another single-day record. But Trump said we already passed the peak.

So they changed the way they count to prove him wrong. Do you really think NYC had 3600 people die overnight?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another day, another single-day record. But Trump said we already passed the peak.

So they changed the way they count to prove him wrong. Do you really think NYC had 3600 people die overnight?

Anonymous wrote:Another day, another single-day record. But Trump said we already passed the peak.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would suggest that as "we are all in this together", all gvt employees should take a minimum of 10% salary cut.
(I'd say 5% for low salaries, up to 25% for everyone with higher salaries).
Everyone else is taking pay-cut so it seems only fair.

Then maybe, we will hear a bit more of "let's open back sooner"...

When I think of how loud CS are complaining when the gvt shut down when they KNOW they'll get paid back-pay,
I find the "let's stay close until we find a vaccine" crowd repulsive.

I don’t know of anyone saying to shut down until we find a vaccine.

At any rate you know of we open up before there is testing for everyone and adequate PPE the economy is going to shut down anyway when too many get sick and can’t go to work.

And you personally WILL lose a loved one, you realize that right? Who are you willing to sacrifice?

One of my mother's best friend's died yesterday with Coronavirus. She was in her 80s, lived in New Rochelle, and had serious heart issues, for which she had been hospitalized frequently as of late.

If you are giving me a choice between a woman in her 80s with a serious co-morbidity that was going to kill her within a year and a child starving to death due to lockdowns, I'm choosing the former.

Now do all the young people with co-morbid conditions that will die or be harmed by letting the virus run amok.

Anonymous wrote:Another day, another single-day record. But Trump said we already passed the peak.

Anonymous wrote:Another day, another single-day record. But Trump said we already passed the peak.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would suggest that as "we are all in this together", all gvt employees should take a minimum of 10% salary cut.
(I'd say 5% for low salaries, up to 25% for everyone with higher salaries).
Everyone else is taking pay-cut so it seems only fair.

Then maybe, we will hear a bit more of "let's open back sooner"...

When I think of how loud CS are complaining when the gvt shut down when they KNOW they'll get paid back-pay,
I find the "let's stay close until we find a vaccine" crowd repulsive.

I don’t know of anyone saying to shut down until we find a vaccine.

At any rate you know of we open up before there is testing for everyone and adequate PPE the economy is going to shut down anyway when too many get sick and can’t go to work.

And you personally WILL lose a loved one, you realize that right? Who are you willing to sacrifice?

One of my mother's best friend's died yesterday with Coronavirus. She was in her 80s, lived in New Rochelle, and had serious heart issues, for which she had been hospitalized frequently as of late.

If you are giving me a choice between a woman in her 80s with a serious co-morbidity that was going to kill her within a year and a child starving to death due to lockdowns, I'm choosing the former.