Anonymous wrote:Barr's play here is simple.. law and order.

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile in Special Counsel land...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/special-counsel-john-durham-adding-prosecutors

Wonder if these additions are like the 18 angry Democrat lawyers on the Mueller team?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bill Barr’s appointment of John Durham is in violation of 28 CFR 600.3

“The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government.”

John Durham was a US Attorney since 2018. Durham will need to resign either immediately or when there is a real AG who cares about laws in place.

Silly troll... we all know that durhan is close but not there in bringing down the corruption of the democrats. Maybe he should retire like Mueller and be appointed the next day?

Barr started the Whitewater investigation that saddled the Clinton Administration and ended with Clinton's impeachment over a completely unrelated matter. NOTHING ever came of Whitewater. Leaving Durham in place as Barr shuts the door is the same playbook. The difference is, people like Sally Yates knows the facts around the investigation and would be sure to let ALL of them come out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

Not really PP. my time on dcum has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that most dcum posters are low information voters.
And posters.

But Biden and his Obama admin alums are about to get a serious taste of their own medicine.
I hope sally yates is ready.

And what a delicious constitutional crisis it will be if the Hair Sniffer is directly involved.

Stay tuned.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/12/02/durham-special-counsel-give-biden-problems-column/3793099001/

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

What were you expecting?

Barr actually said "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”". Key words: "To date" Note most of the media left out those two words. They matter

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

What were you expecting?

Barr actually said "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”". Key words: "To date" Note most of the media left out those two words. They matter

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

What were you expecting?

Barr actually said "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”". Key words: "To date" Note most of the media left out those two words. They matter

Not in this example, they don't. He used those two words to placate the president. There is ZERO, none, nada evidence of any fraud, except for the two voters in PA.

You're speculating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

What were you expecting?

Barr actually said "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”". Key words: "To date" Note most of the media left out those two words. They matter

Not in this example, they don't. He used those two words to placate the president. There is ZERO, none, nada evidence of any fraud, except for the two voters in PA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

What were you expecting?

Barr actually said "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”". Key words: "To date" Note most of the media left out those two words. They matter

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

What were you expecting?

Anonymous wrote:I find it ironic that three years and lots of post here on the Mueller special counsel investigation, yet crickets on yesterdays announcement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bill Barr’s appointment of John Durham is in violation of 28 CFR 600.3

“The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government.”

John Durham was a US Attorney since 2018. Durham will need to resign either immediately or when there is a real AG who cares about laws in place.

Silly troll... we all know that durhan is close but not there in bringing down the corruption of the democrats. Maybe he should retire like Mueller and be appointed the next day?

Barr started the Whitewater investigation that saddled the Clinton Administration and ended with Clinton's impeachment over a completely unrelated matter. NOTHING ever came of Whitewater. Leaving Durham in place as Barr shuts the door is the same playbook. The difference is, people like Sally Yates knows the facts around the investigation and would be sure to let ALL of them come out.