Anonymous
09/16/2019 16:30
Subject: The St James FC Virginia vs Richmond United Scrimmages
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is no less dumb than claiming 16 is the age of consent in other countries.
An odd thing to say in reaction to such accusations.
You dont get it or understand how to read thru the posts. This was in response to the "16 is the age of consent" and that being the Brazillian Way (since Gus coaches at FCV)
It's not the fcv way. it's not clever. try to follow along
The Brazilian way was in response to the comment regarding the age of consent. They were separate posts.
Anonymous
09/16/2019 16:26
Subject: The St James FC Virginia vs Richmond United Scrimmages
Anonymous wrote:It is no less dumb than claiming 16 is the age of consent in other countries.
An odd thing to say in reaction to such accusations.
You dont get it or understand how to read thru the posts. This was in response to the "16 is the age of consent" and that being the Brazillian Way (since Gus coaches at FCV)
It's not the fcv way. it's not clever. try to follow along
Anonymous
09/16/2019 15:46
Subject: The St James FC Virginia vs Richmond United Scrimmages
It is no less dumb than claiming 16 is the age of consent in other countries.
An odd thing to say in reaction to such accusations.
An odd thing to say in reaction to such accusations.
Anonymous
09/16/2019 14:49
Subject: The St James FC Virginia vs Richmond United Scrimmages
Anonymous wrote:Lol. Many cultures? Is that the argument? Consent The Brazilian Way tm
Oh my gosh. that is so super clever. it must totally be true. It would definitely be true if you could make one of your cute little hashtags about it. Let me try #sof'inguntrue
Anonymous
09/15/2019 08:05
Subject: The St James FC Virginia vs Richmond United Scrimmages
Lol. Many cultures? Is that the argument? Consent The Brazilian Way tm
Anonymous
09/14/2019 20:54
Subject: The St James FC Virginia vs Richmond United Scrimmages
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#cuddles
You realize your anonymity isn’t protected if you’re breaking the law. The accusation you’re making is serious and defamatory if knowingly not true.
No one has committed defamation or libel here and I don't believe anyone has broken any laws by posting here. The mentioned items, staying in a hotel room with someone and having a sleepover, are not illegal, nor are they "defamation" worthy. They are well known and talked about in circles, though, and the topic has been discussed a number of times on this forum.
Why are you more concerned with intimidating posters to shut them up instead of these, while not illegal, very questionable activities?
the statement was that a male adult coach slept in the same hotel room as a underage girl and was followed by statements that alleged inappropriate touching at a mininum with more serious insinuations. if there is not truth to this, it is most certainly defamatory and illegal and a crime. again, anonymity will not protect you.
16 is not underage in many cultures.