Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Dems have been busted for pedophila? GOP has two recently, Hastert and Moore. I guess Weiner?

Joseph Morrissey, Jacob Schwartz, Ed Murray...

Who?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked, SHOCKED that someone who espouses moral superiority and judgement over the sovereignty of others, has sick skeletons in his closet.

Anthony Weiner, is that you? or is this Ted kennedy?

Well, no, because they don't/didn't the moral high ground and judge people like the party of "family values" does. So, not the same thing.

Also, nice try and deflection. Typical, you can't defend your party's guy so you attack others. Maybe instead of being on here, you should do some soul searching to reconcile your need to do that.

Not the PP, but spare us your sanctimony. No one is deflecting - we're simply pointing out what hypocrites you are for somehow putting your outrage on mute when it comes to Democrats and their own share of sex scandals. And please - Democrats claim the moral high ground every single day. Moron.

If by moral high ground you mean we don't think a man who brags about grabbing women's genitalia should become president then I plead guilty.

What about a man who receives blow jobs from an intern under his desk in the Oval Office?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If Moore does falsely deny the claim publicly, he gives his victim a distinct defamation claim that isn't time-barred.

And if he truthfully denies it, she gives him one as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked, SHOCKED that someone who espouses moral superiority and judgement over the sovereignty of others, has sick skeletons in his closet.

Anthony Weiner, is that you? or is this Ted kennedy?

Well, no, because they don't/didn't the moral high ground and judge people like the party of "family values" does. So, not the same thing.

Also, nice try and deflection. Typical, you can't defend your party's guy so you attack others. Maybe instead of being on here, you should do some soul searching to reconcile your need to do that.

Not the PP, but spare us your sanctimony. No one is deflecting - we're simply pointing out what hypocrites you are for somehow putting your outrage on mute when it comes to Democrats and their own share of sex scandals. And please - Democrats claim the moral high ground every single day. Moron.

If by moral high ground you mean we don't think a man who brags about grabbing women's genitalia should become president then I plead guilty.

Anonymous wrote:He was a prosecutor serving an under-aged girl alcohol.

Anonymous wrote: If Moore does falsely deny the claim publicly, he gives his victim a distinct defamation claim that isn't time-barred.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked, SHOCKED that someone who espouses moral superiority and judgement over the sovereignty of others, has sick skeletons in his closet.

Anthony Weiner, is that you? or is this Ted kennedy?

Well, no, because they don't/didn't the moral high ground and judge people like the party of "family values" does. So, not the same thing.

Also, nice try and deflection. Typical, you can't defend your party's guy so you attack others. Maybe instead of being on here, you should do some soul searching to reconcile your need to do that.

Not the PP, but spare us your sanctimony. No one is deflecting - we're simply pointing out what hypocrites you are for somehow putting your outrage on mute when it comes to Democrats and their own share of sex scandals. And please - Democrats claim the moral high ground every single day. Moron.

Bye, Felicia.

Anonymous wrote:More to the point, his buddies in Alabama are on board:

“There’s nothing to see here,” said Jim Zeigler, the state auditor and a longtime supporter of Mr. Moore. “Single man, early 30s, never been married, dating teenage girls. Never been married and he liked younger girls. According to The Washington Post account he never had sexual intercourse with any of them.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sens Perdue and Murkowski with the right response.

Why is anyone on this forum defending Moore?

Tribalism...and a low level of respect for women's bodily autonomy.

I've seen *no one* on this forum defending Moore. What I have seen, thankfully, is a lot of evidence of Democratic hypocrisy. Plenty of Dem politicians have been involved in underage sex scandals (or just sex scandals in general, plenty of those) and we haven't heard a peep from you people. So save us your outrage.

LONG LIVE WHATABOUTISM!!

Anonymous wrote:It's only the Republicans who rant on about the Ten Commandments and the scourge of homosexuality and the ills of liberal society, and go off and commit pedophilic acts.

At least the Dems who commit sex crimes aren't pretending to be paragons of holiness and rectitude.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

I hope you don't have kids. And if you do, I hope they don't allow their friends around you.

NP here. Do you always believe every accusation, no matter how long ago, no matter that there is zero proof? Seriously? I prefer to listen to all the facts before making a rush to judgment - no matter what the accusation is and regardless of the accuser's gender.

Sadly, this is why so many predators go unpunished. How can you "prove" that he molested her? It's not like you can use a rape kit even if she had gone to police right away. And what additional "facts" do you expect to come to light? What would be proof for you? A witness?