Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Yes, I do. I know that Spanish government pointed the guns inward at the Catalonians. And there are those in office here doing the same.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
We intend to.

Who are the royal "we"? I thought you speak for yourself.

I speak for all those who believe that this is a deliberate attempt to remove the President.

You’re right. It is a deliberate attempt to remove Trump as president. For committing treason. Glad you caught up with the rest of us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
We intend to.

Who are the royal "we"? I thought you speak for yourself.

I speak for all those who believe that this is a deliberate attempt to remove the President.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The big question.....will Trump pardon after the accused's name becomes public?

Doesn't the person have to be convicted or plead guilty to be pardoned?

Yep, and just think about all the stuff that will probably come out during the trial!

Are you kidding? We can’t even get bank records from Fusion GPS who hired a foreign national who paid off Soviet sources in the dossier. FML.

To think the Department of Homeland Security was created to break up silos. Russia didn’t do thison their own. Obama admin and Hillary and her attorneys did this.

Obama and Hillary and her attorneys conspired to swing the Election for Trump?

Ummm. Okay. That’s an interesting take.

They conspired to swing it for themselves, but failed. Hence, all the shock and disbelief that night. Remember? "What Happened?"

Gimme a break. *Trump* was shocked that he won. Everyone was shocked. It was shocking for the election to come down to 60k votes in 3 states. Especially given the huge split in the popular vote.

Certain people knew why I had correctly predicted his win. So no, everyone was not shocked.

Do they work at the Wal-Mart in rural Alabama and go by two first names? Because Jim Bob absolutely called it.

No, they don't, Bimbo. They're my attorney friends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
We intend to.

Who are the royal "we"? I thought you speak for yourself.

I speak for all those who believe that this is a deliberate attempt to remove the President.

Yes, it is. To remove him for treason for which the punishment is a firing squad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

I believe this to be true. It's not about democratic royalty though. It's more about $$$

Which is why he left a multimillion dollar big law partnership to be a fed? Really?

Money, power, and fame make people do really bad things, right?

He was the guy who brought down Enron.
The former head of the FBI
Probably one of the highest paid attorneys in DC


He had money. He had fame (among people who pay attention anyway). He had power. And he is going out of his way to be as low profile as humanly possible. He gives no comments. He never speaks to the press. He never leaks. (Thank God) he never tweets. He never gives interviews. No one ever seems to snap a photo of him eating dinner in Georgetown with his wife, FFS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
We intend to.

Who are the royal "we"? I thought you speak for yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

I believe this to be true. It's not about democratic royalty though. It's more about $$$

Which is why he left a multimillion dollar big law partnership to be a fed? Really?

Money, power, and fame make people do really bad things, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Not everyone. And certainly not anymore, given what's been uncovered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Not everyone. And certainly not anymore, given what's been uncovered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
We intend to.

Who are the royal "we"? I thought you speak for yourself.

I speak for all those who believe that this is a deliberate attempt to remove the President.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Senate leadership, too. Everyone has agreed that Mueller is impartial, the perfect choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The president is above the law. He can pardon his way out of trouble and replace any troublesome investigators or prosecutors. The GOP is solidly behind him.

The ones who should be worried are Hillary and Podesta.

Mueller will never bring charges to democrat royalty (Clintons & Obamas). He wants to be in history books, he wants the best NY Times obit there is, so he's going to be a thorn in Trump's side by pressing the people around him. He'll get Trump to resign going after Kushner and/or Don Jr.

Funny. Mueller's been a Republican forever, but the way y'all disown Rs as RINOs when they're not Tea Party or Trumpers, I guess, means that doesn't count.

+1. Mueller was hired as special counsel, and every single member of the Senate, Dems and Republicans, went on record praising him as the best possible, most competent, fairest, most impartial choice. Paul Ryan and the House leadership said the same.

Everyone on both teams agreed on the referee. It sucks that you are down by 52 points with 90 seconds to play. But that’s what happens when you draft incompetent losers.

Blaming the Ref for your own istupid mistakes is going to get you nowhere.

The bolded? Raised eyebrows.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting twitter rumor running around that Trump could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator, a la Nixon. Process that for a moment.

not a lawyer but...that means he can't pardon the other conspirators, right?

It’s a bad idea. Terrible really. Worse than firing Mueller. Possibly obstruction of justice. But he probably could, technically. Because he hasn’t been convicted. It’s weird territory. For sure.

The big deal here is that it would mean that Meuller has found evidence sufficient to indict Trump on something, but he can’t while Trump is in office, because a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted. It is the big red arrow pointing at Trump saying “this guy committed this specific crime with these people, so it’s time to impeach him”. Nixon resigned about six weeks after it became public that he was an unindicted co-conspirator.

Who do you all follow on Twitter that has good intel (i.e., has actually been right about something in the past)?

A bunch of alt-Federal accounts. Which do a surprisingly good job of tapping into the Feds (the deep state in action, ladies and gentlemen. I said I’d bring bagels to the next deep state meeting right?). But this looks like pure, unadulterated, wouldn’t it be great if speculation. Hence the use of the word rumor. Although I think this also popped up on News and Guts today.

I do believe there's a dishonest effort to get Trump removed. It's pretty clear now. That's the really bad part if he IS removed. This is all pretty banana republic, from the media being in bed with the Dems, etc. We put Catalonia/Spain to shame!

Do you know anything about Spain and Catalonia? At all? It has nothing in common with modern American politics besides a bunch of people unhappy with the government. SMH.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
We intend to.

Who are the royal "we"? I thought you speak for yourself.