This is the weirdest fucking thread I have ever read on DCUM.

And I've read burgundy washcloth, asparagus and bobcat boyfriend.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Right, IMPLIED that you thought it was a lot, and then followed that up by accusing the OP of being nuts.

Really, keep denying it. It's so transparent.

I've already explained it to you. So you can yammer on about whatever you want.

You are still wrong.

Sorry but no.

But keep trying for it, it's sure entertaining to read

I'm one of the PPs, I can pull up times if it's important. Out of curiosity, have you ever been in a school after they let out? Teachers are cleaning up rooms quickly, if at all, admin wants to get everything done as quickly as possible. There are meetings for teachers with the principal to discuss what worked and what didn't, problems with certain students and what can be done to lessen the disruption, etc. OP needs to talk to the principal, not the secretary, but the secretary is the only one who *might* have time to talk to her in the first few days after school lets out. Personally, I would have left a message for the principal over the weekend and requested a meeting with her for Thursday. There's no way that I would have tried to go in on Monday, because nothing would be accomplished other than irritating the people that OP needs to help her. It sounds to me like OP and her daughter and enjoying vacation so far, and just want to be done with this asap, they just need the school personnel to have time for a meeting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm incredibly glad to hear that the principal is working with you to contact the parents. I hope this is resolved soon, for your daughter's peace of mind.

Thanks! I'm confident it will be resolved soon.

But it's Wednesday, and the school was open Monday. So explain to us again: Why weren't you down there on Monday, with your daughter, looking through a yearbook to ID the kid?

Since you didn't make it a priority, it's fair to say that it's not that important to you. So I guess if you can't be bothered to follow up, we can just let those boys off the hook.

You're making things up. I'm not responsible for your imagination. Read the thread.

NP - I have read the thread. Why don't you ever answer a direct question like this?

Because I've answered it already. I have also said I have no interest in giving a play by play so the nutjobs can scream "Embellishment!" I've said that I'm working on it, have spoken to the principal about it, and have made progress in trying to ID him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm incredibly glad to hear that the principal is working with you to contact the parents. I hope this is resolved soon, for your daughter's peace of mind.

Thanks! I'm confident it will be resolved soon.

But it's Wednesday, and the school was open Monday. So explain to us again: Why weren't you down there on Monday, with your daughter, looking through a yearbook to ID the kid?

Since you didn't make it a priority, it's fair to say that it's not that important to you. So I guess if you can't be bothered to follow up, we can just let those boys off the hook.

You're making things up. I'm not responsible for your imagination. Read the thread.

NP - I have read the thread. Why don't you ever answer a direct question like this?

OMG

The trolls are out in force, I see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^sure, please do. Because right now, attacking OP for the number of students in middle school, then getting corrected, then denying it happened at all, seems pretty damn bizarre.

Holy cats you are something else.

1) I didn't attack the OP for the number of students. I said I was trying to figure out which school had so many in two grades.

2) Here you go: I'll type slow

I'm still trying to figure out what middle school has 2000* students. Yikes. - Statement about the school in question. *It was 1000, but statement stands

Also OP is nuts. - Also... as in in addition to my statement about that being one crowded middle school, having read this thread my summation is that the OP is nuts.

So now you are trying to play it off as though this were some kind of word salad post, too TOTALLY UNRELATED sentences that have zero to do with each other and you just decided to throw together for the hell of it?

LOL. Lady you are too much.

Wow, the weird really comes out late at night on DCUM.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm incredibly glad to hear that the principal is working with you to contact the parents. I hope this is resolved soon, for your daughter's peace of mind.

Thanks! I'm confident it will be resolved soon.

But it's Wednesday, and the school was open Monday. So explain to us again: Why weren't you down there on Monday, with your daughter, looking through a yearbook to ID the kid?

Since you didn't make it a priority, it's fair to say that it's not that important to you. So I guess if you can't be bothered to follow up, we can just let those boys off the hook.

You're making things up. I'm not responsible for your imagination. Read the thread.

NP - I have read the thread. Why don't you ever answer a direct question like this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Right, IMPLIED that you thought it was a lot, and then followed that up by accusing the OP of being nuts.

Really, keep denying it. It's so transparent.

I've already explained it to you. So you can yammer on about whatever you want.

You are still wrong.

Sorry but no.

But keep trying for it, it's sure entertaining to read

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm incredibly glad to hear that the principal is working with you to contact the parents. I hope this is resolved soon, for your daughter's peace of mind.

Thanks! I'm confident it will be resolved soon.

But it's Wednesday, and the school was open Monday. So explain to us again: Why weren't you down there on Monday, with your daughter, looking through a yearbook to ID the kid?

Since you didn't make it a priority, it's fair to say that it's not that important to you. So I guess if you can't be bothered to follow up, we can just let those boys off the hook.

You're making things up. I'm not responsible for your imagination. Read the thread.

Anonymous wrote:Right, IMPLIED that you thought it was a lot, and then followed that up by accusing the OP of being nuts.

Really, keep denying it. It's so transparent.

I've already explained it to you. So you can yammer on about whatever you want.

You are still wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm incredibly glad to hear that the principal is working with you to contact the parents. I hope this is resolved soon, for your daughter's peace of mind.

Thanks! I'm confident it will be resolved soon.

But it's Wednesday, and the school was open Monday. So explain to us again: Why weren't you down there on Monday, with your daughter, looking through a yearbook to ID the kid?

Since you didn't make it a priority, it's fair to say that it's not that important to you. So I guess if you can't be bothered to follow up, we can just let those boys off the hook.

Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm incredibly glad to hear that the principal is working with you to contact the parents. I hope this is resolved soon, for your daughter's peace of mind.

Thanks! I'm confident it will be resolved soon.

Right, IMPLIED that you thought it was a lot, and then followed that up by accusing the OP of being nuts.

Really, keep denying it. It's so transparent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^sure, please do. Because right now, attacking OP for the number of students in middle school, then getting corrected, then denying it happened at all, seems pretty damn bizarre.

Holy cats you are something else.

1) I didn't attack the OP for the number of students. I said I was trying to figure out which school had so many in two grades.

2) Here you go: I'll type slow

I'm still trying to figure out what middle school has 2000* students. Yikes. - Statement about the school in question. *It was 1000, but statement stands

Also OP is nuts. - Also... as in in addition to my statement about that being one crowded middle school, having read this thread my summation is that the OP is nuts.

So now you are trying to play it off as though this were some kind of word salad post, too TOTALLY UNRELATED sentences that have zero to do with each other and you just decided to throw together for the hell of it?

LOL. Lady you are too much.

Yes, two totally unrelated sentences. This is why I hit enter twice and started my next sentence with "also".

Are you really not going to acknowledge your mistake?

Oh come on, really? You implied that it was absolutely implausible for a middle school to have 2000 students. You really are going to try to deny that, when it's plain as day?

Plain as day to who?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^sure, please do. Because right now, attacking OP for the number of students in middle school, then getting corrected, then denying it happened at all, seems pretty damn bizarre.

Holy cats you are something else.

1) I didn't attack the OP for the number of students. I said I was trying to figure out which school had so many in two grades.

2) Here you go: I'll type slow

I'm still trying to figure out what middle school has 2000* students. Yikes. - Statement about the school in question. *It was 1000, but statement stands

Also OP is nuts. - Also... as in in addition to my statement about that being one crowded middle school, having read this thread my summation is that the OP is nuts.

So now you are trying to play it off as though this were some kind of word salad post, too TOTALLY UNRELATED sentences that have zero to do with each other and you just decided to throw together for the hell of it?

LOL. Lady you are too much.

Yes, two totally unrelated sentences. This is why I hit enter twice and started my next sentence with "also".

Are you really not going to acknowledge your mistake?

Oh come on, really? You implied that it was absolutely implausible for a middle school to have 2000 students. You really are going to try to deny that, when it's plain as day?

You do seem to have some sort of comprehension problem. I didn't say it was implausible nor impossible. I said I was trying to figure out which school it was. I implied that I thought that was a lot of students for two grades.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^sure, please do. Because right now, attacking OP for the number of students in middle school, then getting corrected, then denying it happened at all, seems pretty damn bizarre.

Holy cats you are something else.

1) I didn't attack the OP for the number of students. I said I was trying to figure out which school had so many in two grades.

2) Here you go: I'll type slow

I'm still trying to figure out what middle school has 2000* students. Yikes. - Statement about the school in question. *It was 1000, but statement stands

Also OP is nuts. - Also... as in in addition to my statement about that being one crowded middle school, having read this thread my summation is that the OP is nuts.

So now you are trying to play it off as though this were some kind of word salad post, too TOTALLY UNRELATED sentences that have zero to do with each other and you just decided to throw together for the hell of it?

LOL. Lady you are too much.

Wow, the weird really comes out late at night on DCUM.