Anonymous
Post 05/12/2026 08:02     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like FCPS is prioritizing eliminating split feeders, based on the maps. So that's not a real compelling argument, Lees Corner Mama.


They are eliminating split feeders at both Wolftrap and Spring Hill ES.

It’s so obvious some of you have no ability to read a map. If you did you’d know moving Lees Corner when it’s so close to Chantilly would be the epitome of stupid. It appears Reid and several School Board have quickly come to the same conclusion.


Scenario 1 tries to eliminate Navy as a split feeder - by moving current Navy Chantilly HS families (including Highland Oaks) all the way to Oakton HS. Sorry but not interested in that commute. The elementary school kids all change friends in middle school anyway. I’m not sure I see a need to keep all of the elementary at the same high school?

Scenario 3 also eliminates Navy as a split feeder by moving all current Navy Oakton HS families over to Chantilly HS.


That requires bumping Lee's Corner out--it is not going to happen unless they move out a whole bunch of Brookfield and Poplar Tree.


But why would moving Navy Chantilly HS families to Oakton HS bump Lees Corner out of Chantilly? I don’t get the connection?


OOPs! I Must have misread. I thought you were moving all of Navy IN to Chantilly. But, those Navy kids live across the road from Chantilly. They should not move them out.


Yeah. Scenario 1 moves all Navy kids out to Oakton. Scenario 3 moves all Navy kids in to Chantilly. Scenario 2 leaves the Navy kids’ high schools alone which is why I’m in favor of that one.


Scenario 3 moves all the newly zoned Navy kids to Chantilly, but it also rezones a portion of them to Waples Mill > Oakton. However, if they aren’t touching ES boundaries now, then there will still be a portion of Navy kids who go to Oakton.


I thought that was actually in Scenario 1?

Since they aren’t touching the elementary school boundaries my guess is they would revise the maps then so those kids would stay with the Navy cohort. I am eager to see the new maps at the end of the month.
Anonymous
Post 05/12/2026 07:58     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Considering kids change friendships over time, make new friends in middle school, is it that important/does it make sense to keep the entire elementary school at the same high school even at the expense of commute? I’m feeling like aligning middle schools to high schools is more important?


+1. I have a student at Franklin right now and nearly all of his friend group will go to a high school different from him. I am ambivalent about which high school my younger two kids attend, but would like it to be one that the majority of their middle school is attending. To me, that is the issue with Scenario 2 that so many like. It sends the Navy kids to Rocky Run where most will continue on to Chantilly and only a small fraction would go to Oakton (we're in the small fraction).


I agree with you that’s not ideal. Maybe they can tweak it so that does not happen. We are a Navy Chantilly family so going to Rocky Run would be better for us as our child would meet more Chantilly kids. At Franklin, I believe it’s actually more kids going to Oakton so that is already difficult for us.
Anonymous
Post 05/12/2026 07:32     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't seem like FCPS is prioritizing eliminating split feeders, based on the maps. So that's not a real compelling argument, Lees Corner Mama.


They are eliminating split feeders at both Wolftrap and Spring Hill ES.

It’s so obvious some of you have no ability to read a map. If you did you’d know moving Lees Corner when it’s so close to Chantilly would be the epitome of stupid. It appears Reid and several School Board have quickly come to the same conclusion.


Scenario 1 tries to eliminate Navy as a split feeder - by moving current Navy Chantilly HS families (including Highland Oaks) all the way to Oakton HS. Sorry but not interested in that commute. The elementary school kids all change friends in middle school anyway. I’m not sure I see a need to keep all of the elementary at the same high school?

Scenario 3 also eliminates Navy as a split feeder by moving all current Navy Oakton HS families over to Chantilly HS.


That requires bumping Lee's Corner out--it is not going to happen unless they move out a whole bunch of Brookfield and Poplar Tree.


But why would moving Navy Chantilly HS families to Oakton HS bump Lees Corner out of Chantilly? I don’t get the connection?


OOPs! I Must have misread. I thought you were moving all of Navy IN to Chantilly. But, those Navy kids live across the road from Chantilly. They should not move them out.


Yeah. Scenario 1 moves all Navy kids out to Oakton. Scenario 3 moves all Navy kids in to Chantilly. Scenario 2 leaves the Navy kids’ high schools alone which is why I’m in favor of that one.


Scenario 3 moves all the newly zoned Navy kids to Chantilly, but it also rezones a portion of them to Waples Mill > Oakton. However, if they aren’t touching ES boundaries now, then there will still be a portion of Navy kids who go to Oakton.
Anonymous
Post 05/12/2026 07:17     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think thats the sliver of Cub Run people have mentioned makes sense to move. Very few kids over there though.
I wish they had put the spa numbers on the maps.


Last good SPA map I found was the one from the FCPS [not consultant] Coates cancelled project that was wrapped into the incompetent. https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/Coates-Area-Boundary-Maps.pdf

Using boundary locator and finding addresses from some gives you an idea of the absurdity on basic stuff like AAP feeds and school assignments.

The delayed Coates change really highlights how bad the comprehensive review has been. Instead of fixing the immediate needs now, the school board delayed those urgent fixes to waste everyone’s time effort and money on unnecessary changes that caused a lot of stress for a lot of families across the county.

So annoying, and they plan to run it back in a couple of years. Buffoonery.
Anonymous
Post 05/12/2026 06:44     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:I think thats the sliver of Cub Run people have mentioned makes sense to move. Very few kids over there though.
I wish they had put the spa numbers on the maps.


Last good SPA map I found was the one from the FCPS [not consultant] Coates cancelled project that was wrapped into the incompetent. https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/Coates-Area-Boundary-Maps.pdf

Using boundary locator and finding addresses from some gives you an idea of the absurdity on basic stuff like AAP feeds and school assignments.
Anonymous
Post 05/12/2026 06:40     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:Considering kids change friendships over time, make new friends in middle school, is it that important/does it make sense to keep the entire elementary school at the same high school even at the expense of commute? I’m feeling like aligning middle schools to high schools is more important?


+1. I have a student at Franklin right now and nearly all of his friend group will go to a high school different from him. I am ambivalent about which high school my younger two kids attend, but would like it to be one that the majority of their middle school is attending. To me, that is the issue with Scenario 2 that so many like. It sends the Navy kids to Rocky Run where most will continue on to Chantilly and only a small fraction would go to Oakton (we're in the small fraction).
Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 23:04     Subject: Re:FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Proper decision for Skyview: Scenario 2, but substitute Crossfield for Fox Mill.

Makes the most sense.





I agree. It's the least disruptive for everyone. Keeps most people close to their high schools.


Except Crossfield folk.


What are you talking about? Moving Crossfield to Skyview absolutely keeps people close to their high schools.


I’m talking about Scenario 2 idiot. Scenario 2 doesn’t actually move Crossfield to Skyview. Keep up.


Go read the first pp. For Skyview: Scenario 2 but substitute Crossfield for Fox Mill. Everybody stays close to their school. Most logical conclusion.


Sure, it’s logical when distance is considered.
But other things are being considered too.
Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 21:18     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:I’ve got this for the street I chose:

Anywhere from 7.4 to 7.6 miles to Westfield - 20 minutes or 17 minutes.

Anywhere from 9.4 miles to 11 miles - 16 to 22 minutes.

Mileage wise Westfield is the clear winner.





This one was to Oakton.
Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 21:15     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

I’ve got this for the street I chose:

Anywhere from 7.4 to 7.6 miles to Westfield - 20 minutes or 17 minutes.

Anywhere from 9.4 miles to 11 miles - 16 to 22 minutes.

Mileage wise Westfield is the clear winner.



Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 21:11     Subject: Re:FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Proper decision for Skyview: Scenario 2, but substitute Crossfield for Fox Mill.

Makes the most sense.





I agree. It's the least disruptive for everyone. Keeps most people close to their high schools.


Except Crossfield folk.


What are you talking about? Moving Crossfield to Skyview absolutely keeps people close to their high schools.
Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 20:58     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Maybe RIO should backfill Westfield. According to my map, it’s closer to them than Oakton HS.


You either have a dumb map or a dumb brain


Nope. I literally took a street from RIO and mapped it to both schools. It’s actually still further miles wise to Oakton.


Just checked and for me, its about 5 min further, but if you're east side of west ox it gets complicated.


I took a street from a Crossfield neighborhood and it’s clear as day that Westfield is closer.


The fastest route right now from my house to Oakton is 14 minutes. The fastest route to Westfield HS is 17 minutes.

9 to Chantilly
8 to Skyview
9 to South Lakes


What's the mileage?

Travel time will vary throughout the day depending on commuter traffic


DP.

House (not mine, but in my friend's neighborhood) currently zoned for Crossfield, Carson, and Oakton.
-- 6.9 miles to Oakton High School
-- 9.3 miles to Westfield High School
-- 4.9 miles to Chantilly High School
-- 3.8 miles to South Lakes High School

Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 20:53     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Maybe RIO should backfill Westfield. According to my map, it’s closer to them than Oakton HS.


You either have a dumb map or a dumb brain


Nope. I literally took a street from RIO and mapped it to both schools. It’s actually still further miles wise to Oakton.


Just checked and for me, its about 5 min further, but if you're east side of west ox it gets complicated.


I took a street from a Crossfield neighborhood and it’s clear as day that Westfield is closer.


The fastest route right now from my house to Oakton is 14 minutes. The fastest route to Westfield HS is 17 minutes.

9 to Chantilly
8 to Skyview
9 to South Lakes


What's the mileage?

Travel time will vary throughout the day depending on commuter traffic


Mileage to Oakton is longer than mileage to Westfield from the street I chose.
Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 20:42     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Maybe RIO should backfill Westfield. According to my map, it’s closer to them than Oakton HS.


You either have a dumb map or a dumb brain


Nope. I literally took a street from RIO and mapped it to both schools. It’s actually still further miles wise to Oakton.


Just checked and for me, its about 5 min further, but if you're east side of west ox it gets complicated.


I took a street from a Crossfield neighborhood and it’s clear as day that Westfield is closer.


The fastest route right now from my house to Oakton is 14 minutes. The fastest route to Westfield HS is 17 minutes.

9 to Chantilly
8 to Skyview
9 to South Lakes


What's the mileage?

Travel time will vary throughout the day depending on commuter traffic
Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 20:33     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

I’m so glad Reid added another level of reviews through July. Two more months of this…sigh.
Anonymous
Post 05/11/2026 20:24     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Scenario 1/2/3

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Maybe RIO should backfill Westfield. According to my map, it’s closer to them than Oakton HS.


You either have a dumb map or a dumb brain


Nope. I literally took a street from RIO and mapped it to both schools. It’s actually still further miles wise to Oakton.


Just checked and for me, its about 5 min further, but if you're east side of west ox it gets complicated.


I took a street from a Crossfield neighborhood and it’s clear as day that Westfield is closer.


The fastest route right now from my house to Oakton is 14 minutes. The fastest route to Westfield HS is 17 minutes.

9 to Chantilly
8 to Skyview
9 to South Lakes