Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638

I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing screams “Trump was all up in Epstein’s sick world and lovin’ it” louder than ordering DOJ to start digging up the names of Democrats also on the island.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/11/14/trump-justice-epstein-democrats/?itid=hp-mv-top-stories_top-table-main_p001_f001

Sure, we care, very much so, we need the full list of participants, dead and alive, but the big problem the country needs to address is the current POTUS right here, right now in 2025. Should he be in prison and on the sex offender list for the rest of his pathetic life? That’s the pressing question.

Clinton being involved isn’t going to make Trump any less guilty. He can throw the ball, but why oh why would we follow. He’s the POTUS, and a POTUS well-known for being an perv. And he’s been abusing this country and its people and their tax dollars since he stepped back in the Oval office. Many of us, including MAGA, would still want him impeached and removed (along with all the gold crap); Clinton’s involvement isn’t going to change that one bit.

+1 who cares about Clinton. He's not POTUS, nor was he the one who campaigned on releasing the files.

Put Clinton and Trump both under oath and ask them about the blowjob story!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638

I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.

“Homeland” has always sounded Nazi to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638

I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing screams “Trump was all up in Epstein’s sick world and lovin’ it” louder than ordering DOJ to start digging up the names of Democrats also on the island.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/11/14/trump-justice-epstein-democrats/?itid=hp-mv-top-stories_top-table-main_p001_f001

Sure, we care, very much so, we need the full list of participants, dead and alive, but the big problem the country needs to address is the current POTUS right here, right now in 2025. Should he be in prison and on the sex offender list for the rest of his pathetic life? That’s the pressing question.

Clinton being involved isn’t going to make Trump any less guilty. He can throw the ball, but why oh why would we follow. He’s the POTUS, and a POTUS well-known for being an perv. And he’s been abusing this country and its people and their tax dollars since he stepped back in the Oval office. Many of us, including MAGA, would still want him impeached and removed (along with all the gold crap); Clinton’s involvement isn’t going to change that one bit.

+1 who cares about Clinton. He's not POTUS, nor was he the one who campaigned on releasing the files.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We do not know whose name was redacted.

Republicans have stated that it was a victim who has stated that Mr. Trump did nothing inappropriate. This helps Mr. Trump if, in fact, that was the name which was redacted.

A real concern regarding the Epstein files is whether or not it contains allegations and details of money laundering for Russia. This concern was raised recently by a prominent Democrat strategist on a major cable news network a couple of days ago.

I have always believed that it is the money laundering is what will ultimately bring him down.

Anonymous wrote:Nothing screams “Trump was all up in Epstein’s sick world and lovin’ it” louder than ordering DOJ to start digging up the names of Democrats also on the island.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/11/14/trump-justice-epstein-democrats/?itid=hp-mv-top-stories_top-table-main_p001_f001

Sure, we care, very much so, we need the full list of participants, dead and alive, but the big problem the country needs to address is the current POTUS right here, right now in 2025. Should he be in prison and on the sex offender list for the rest of his pathetic life? That’s the pressing question.

Clinton being involved isn’t going to make Trump any less guilty. He can throw the ball, but why oh why would we follow. He’s the POTUS, and a POTUS well-known for being an perv. And he’s been abusing this country and its people and their tax dollars since he stepped back in the Oval office. Many of us, including MAGA, would still want him impeached and removed (along with all the gold crap); Clinton’s involvement isn’t going to change that one bit.

Anonymous wrote:So where is the smoking gun?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump really wouldn’t care if people knew he molested teenage girls. His public comments are of someone who DGAF. I am actually wondering if there are financial crimes in the case. He would care about looking poor or doing bad deals.

This. 100% People will twist themselves into pretzels to defend the sexual assaults. There are crimes being covered up that can't be as easily explained away (to be clear - I'm not saying the sexual assaults are excusable - I'm saying his supporters will have excuses) and have much greater implications than just Trump.

Anyone who tries to rationalize the crimes against these teenagers are disgusting and almost as bad as the men exploiting them. It’s heinous to dismiss what Epstein et al did.

Megyn Kelly is laying the groundwork by saying that the victims were teenaged versus younger ergo it's not too bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump really wouldn’t care if people knew he molested teenage girls. His public comments are of someone who DGAF. I am actually wondering if there are financial crimes in the case. He would care about looking poor or doing bad deals.

This. 100% People will twist themselves into pretzels to defend the sexual assaults. There are crimes being covered up that can't be as easily explained away (to be clear - I'm not saying the sexual assaults are excusable - I'm saying his supporters will have excuses) and have much greater implications than just Trump.

Anyone who tries to rationalize the crimes against these teenagers are disgusting and almost as bad as the men exploiting them. It’s heinous to dismiss what Epstein et al did.

Megyn Kelly is laying the groundwork by saying that the victims were teenaged versus younger ergo it's not too bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump really wouldn’t care if people knew he molested teenage girls. His public comments are of someone who DGAF. I am actually wondering if there are financial crimes in the case. He would care about looking poor or doing bad deals.

This. 100% People will twist themselves into pretzels to defend the sexual assaults. There are crimes being covered up that can't be as easily explained away (to be clear - I'm not saying the sexual assaults are excusable - I'm saying his supporters will have excuses) and have much greater implications than just Trump.

Anyone who tries to rationalize the crimes against these teenagers are disgusting and almost as bad as the men exploiting them. It’s heinous to dismiss what Epstein et al did.

Megyn Kelly is laying the groundwork by saying that the victims were teenaged versus younger ergo it's not too bad.