Anonymous wrote:When I looked at Student Enrollment Pathways by Public School, SY21-22 to SY22-23 https://edscape.dc.gov/node/1640846
and I remember looking at related spreadsheet data, source I can't remember...
my takeaway was for SWW, half of the freshman class (like 77 students) was roughly 1/3 Deal students, 1/3 Hardy students and 1/3 "not in audit" which I feel comfortable guessing is "private schools (and transfers into DCPS not from any DCPS or PCS schools)" and then the other half (like 75 was made up of a couple dozen n<10 DCPS and PCS schools.
Meaning that for all but two schools, there are probably onesie-twosie admissions to SWW as a very normal pattern.
Anonymous wrote:When I looked at Student Enrollment Pathways by Public School, SY21-22 to SY22-23 https://edscape.dc.gov/node/1640846
and I remember looking at related spreadsheet data, source I can't remember...
my takeaway was for SWW, half of the freshman class (like 77 students) was roughly 1/3 Deal students, 1/3 Hardy students and 1/3 "not in audit" which I feel comfortable guessing is "private schools (and transfers into DCPS not from any DCPS or PCS schools)" and then the other half (like 75 was made up of a couple dozen n<10 DCPS and PCS schools.
Meaning that for all but two schools, there are probably onesie-twosie admissions to SWW as a very normal pattern.
Anonymous wrote:When I looked at Student Enrollment Pathways by Public School, SY21-22 to SY22-23 https://edscape.dc.gov/node/1640846
and I remember looking at related spreadsheet data, source I can't remember...
my takeaway was for SWW, half of the freshman class (like 77 students) was roughly 1/3 Deal students, 1/3 Hardy students and 1/3 "not in audit" which I feel comfortable guessing is "private schools (and transfers into DCPS not from any DCPS or PCS schools)" and then the other half (like 75 was made up of a couple dozen n<10 DCPS and PCS schools.
Meaning that for all but two schools, there are probably onesie-twosie admissions to SWW as a very normal pattern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this article is what a PP was referring to. I'd like to see a breakdown of interviewed and accepted students filtered by Middle School.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/school-without-walls-admissions-test-diversity/2021/08/27/6959cec2-0293-11ec-a664-4f6de3e17ff0_story.html
It was!
That seems like you could potentially FOIA that. There are at least records that exist with it.
Anonymous wrote:I think this article is what a PP was referring to. I'd like to see a breakdown of interviewed and accepted students filtered by Middle School.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/school-without-walls-admissions-test-diversity/2021/08/27/6959cec2-0293-11ec-a664-4f6de3e17ff0_story.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the data it looks like more than 50% of applicants are accepted
It sounds like you're looking at the myschoolsdc profile and assuming that the number of lottery "matches" + length of the waitlist = total applications, but that is incorrect. Most of the 1500+ students who apply each year do not get an interview and are not placed on the waitlist at all. The waitlist is made up of the students who were interviewed but did not get an offer on lottery day.
But it's true that more than 50% of students who are interviewed typically get an offer by Sept. 1. Here's that data:
2023: 190 lottery matches + 150 on waitlist = 340 total interviews. 233 offers extended (68.5%)
2022: 170 lottery matches + 211 on waitlist = 381 total interviews. 239 offers extended (62.7%)
2021: 143 lottery matches + 270 on waitlist = 313 total interviews. 238 offers extended (76.0%)
You can find more results here: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aaron2446/viz/MSDCSeatsandWaitlistOfferData_draft/MSDCPublicDisplay
Almost right, except that not all kids that interviewed got put on the WL. At least in 2021, when my kid was applying that was true. More like 500 kids interviewed that year.
How could they leave someone off the waitlist after they were interviewed? Why would they do that?
With the lottery rules, I think any student who ranked another school ahead of SWW and matched would not have been on the waitlist. Not sure if any who had decided to attend privates could have removed themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the data it looks like more than 50% of applicants are accepted
It sounds like you're looking at the myschoolsdc profile and assuming that the number of lottery "matches" + length of the waitlist = total applications, but that is incorrect. Most of the 1500+ students who apply each year do not get an interview and are not placed on the waitlist at all. The waitlist is made up of the students who were interviewed but did not get an offer on lottery day.
But it's true that more than 50% of students who are interviewed typically get an offer by Sept. 1. Here's that data:
2023: 190 lottery matches + 150 on waitlist = 340 total interviews. 233 offers extended (68.5%)
2022: 170 lottery matches + 211 on waitlist = 381 total interviews. 239 offers extended (62.7%)
2021: 143 lottery matches + 270 on waitlist = 313 total interviews. 238 offers extended (76.0%)
You can find more results here: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aaron2446/viz/MSDCSeatsandWaitlistOfferData_draft/MSDCPublicDisplay
Almost right, except that not all kids that interviewed got put on the WL. At least in 2021, when my kid was applying that was true. More like 500 kids interviewed that year.
How could they leave someone off the waitlist after they were interviewed? Why would they do that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the data it looks like more than 50% of applicants are accepted
It sounds like you're looking at the myschoolsdc profile and assuming that the number of lottery "matches" + length of the waitlist = total applications, but that is incorrect. Most of the 1500+ students who apply each year do not get an interview and are not placed on the waitlist at all. The waitlist is made up of the students who were interviewed but did not get an offer on lottery day.
But it's true that more than 50% of students who are interviewed typically get an offer by Sept. 1. Here's that data:
2023: 190 lottery matches + 150 on waitlist = 340 total interviews. 233 offers extended (68.5%)
2022: 170 lottery matches + 211 on waitlist = 381 total interviews. 239 offers extended (62.7%)
2021: 143 lottery matches + 270 on waitlist = 313 total interviews. 238 offers extended (76.0%)
You can find more results here: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aaron2446/viz/MSDCSeatsandWaitlistOfferData_draft/MSDCPublicDisplay
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the data it looks like more than 50% of applicants are accepted
It sounds like you're looking at the myschoolsdc profile and assuming that the number of lottery "matches" + length of the waitlist = total applications, but that is incorrect. Most of the 1500+ students who apply each year do not get an interview and are not placed on the waitlist at all. The waitlist is made up of the students who were interviewed but did not get an offer on lottery day.
But it's true that more than 50% of students who are interviewed typically get an offer by Sept. 1. Here's that data:
2023: 190 lottery matches + 150 on waitlist = 340 total interviews. 233 offers extended (68.5%)
2022: 170 lottery matches + 211 on waitlist = 381 total interviews. 239 offers extended (62.7%)
2021: 143 lottery matches + 270 on waitlist = 313 total interviews. 238 offers extended (76.0%)
You can find more results here: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aaron2446/viz/MSDCSeatsandWaitlistOfferData_draft/MSDCPublicDisplay
Almost right, except that not all kids that interviewed got put on the WL. At least in 2021, when my kid was applying that was true. More like 500 kids interviewed that year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the data it looks like more than 50% of applicants are accepted
It sounds like you're looking at the myschoolsdc profile and assuming that the number of lottery "matches" + length of the waitlist = total applications, but that is incorrect. Most of the 1500+ students who apply each year do not get an interview and are not placed on the waitlist at all. The waitlist is made up of the students who were interviewed but did not get an offer on lottery day.
But it's true that more than 50% of students who are interviewed typically get an offer by Sept. 1. Here's that data:
2023: 190 lottery matches + 150 on waitlist = 340 total interviews. 233 offers extended (68.5%)
2022: 170 lottery matches + 211 on waitlist = 381 total interviews. 239 offers extended (62.7%)
2021: 143 lottery matches + 270 on waitlist = 313 total interviews. 238 offers extended (76.0%)
You can find more results here: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aaron2446/viz/MSDCSeatsandWaitlistOfferData_draft/MSDCPublicDisplay
Almost right, except that not all kids that interviewed got put on the WL. At least in 2021, when my kid was applying that was true. More like 500 kids interviewed that year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the data it looks like more than 50% of applicants are accepted
It sounds like you're looking at the myschoolsdc profile and assuming that the number of lottery "matches" + length of the waitlist = total applications, but that is incorrect. Most of the 1500+ students who apply each year do not get an interview and are not placed on the waitlist at all. The waitlist is made up of the students who were interviewed but did not get an offer on lottery day.
But it's true that more than 50% of students who are interviewed typically get an offer by Sept. 1. Here's that data:
2023: 190 lottery matches + 150 on waitlist = 340 total interviews. 233 offers extended (68.5%)
2022: 170 lottery matches + 211 on waitlist = 381 total interviews. 239 offers extended (62.7%)
2021: 143 lottery matches + 270 on waitlist = 313 total interviews. 238 offers extended (76.0%)
You can find more results here: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aaron2446/viz/MSDCSeatsandWaitlistOfferData_draft/MSDCPublicDisplay
Anonymous wrote:Wasn't the cancellation of the test supposed to be just for the pandemic?
Anonymous wrote:From the data it looks like more than 50% of applicants are accepted