Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:London — to me it was just a bigger NYC.
Except it's charming. YMMV. But yes obviously a big big city vibe where people actually work - not a city run by tourism.
I am from London and it is probably my favorite place in the world to live. That said, I am always surprised that Americans go there as one of their first international destinations for a vacation. There are a lot of places that are more scenic, more different from the US etc.
Any thoughts re small cities/towns outside of London? Is 3 days in Oxford or the like an overkill - for someone who loves walking thru cities, architecture, and staying in nice hotels? Like my ideal vacation day is wake up in a nice hotel, get coffee, go walk around/take a walking tour, sit and get lunch and watch the people go by, walk around some more, dinner (don't care all that much re food/not a foodie), and back to the hotel, rinse and repeat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:London — to me it was just a bigger NYC.
Except it's charming. YMMV. But yes obviously a big big city vibe where people actually work - not a city run by tourism.
I am from London and it is probably my favorite place in the world to live. That said, I am always surprised that Americans go there as one of their first international destinations for a vacation. There are a lot of places that are more scenic, more different from the US etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:London — to me it was just a bigger NYC.
Except it's charming. YMMV. But yes obviously a big big city vibe where people actually work - not a city run by tourism.
I am from London and it is probably my favorite place in the world to live. That said, I am always surprised that Americans go there as one of their first international destinations for a vacation. There are a lot of places that are more scenic, more different from the US etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:London — to me it was just a bigger NYC.
Except it's charming. YMMV. But yes obviously a big big city vibe where people actually work - not a city run by tourism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brussels. Dark, dreary, and boring.
I caught the mumps in Brussels!
I met a man in Brussels. He was 6 foot four and full of muscles.
Did he give you a Vegemite sandwich?
Anonymous wrote:London — to me it was just a bigger NYC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brussels. Dark, dreary, and boring.
I caught the mumps in Brussels!
I met a man in Brussels. He was 6 foot four and full of muscles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brussels isn't overrated because everyone says it's terrible. That's what everyone told us: don't go there it's terrible. It's dreary, charmless, no good restaurants, hard to navigate. Go anywhere else.
Well we wound up flying in and out of Brussels because we saved like 2 grand that way and it was centrally located between other places we wanted to go. Guess what, we had fun! We loved the Magritte museum, we found the cafe culture to be better than in some other European cities (obviously not as good as Paris or Vienna but better than we expected), the pastries were great, and we found a great jazz bar with a million Belgian beers on tap.
I mean, I don't think I'd spend a week in Brussels, but I actually think it's underrated as an entry point to Europe. You're a quick train ride to Bruges for a day or two of classic Flanders Belgium, and Lille is super close and can get you just about anywhere you want to go with access to high speed trains.
I now recommend Brussels when I'm giving people "how to do Europe well on the cheap" tips, as we are known in our circle for knowing how to travel fun places frugally.
Brussels: officially underrated!
Thanks for this. Haven’t been in a loooong time and was kind of shocked at the negative comments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:East african safaris, in general. If you go, only go for a few days. You don't need any more than a week, otherwise it gets old -- very very fast.
I’ve heard this too! Go to Africa but only do a safari for 3-4 days.
Anonymous wrote:East african safaris, in general. If you go, only go for a few days. You don't need any more than a week, otherwise it gets old -- very very fast.
Anonymous wrote:I loved all of my vacations, but London was my least favorite. I have traveled to
Lake Como, Italy
Milan Italy
Nice France
Seville Spain
Dhaka Bangladesh
Switzerland is close to Italy, can't remember the city
I think the trick is to travel to smaller towns. They are less chaotic and cleaner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Verona, Italy
Everywhere, Costa Rica
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Agree Verona is super dull.
Costa Rica we loved the Four Seasons
Verona is super dull? Do you not eat or drink?