Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this works, but if Jeffries has more votes than McCarthy, why isn't he the new Speaker? Why is the GOP able to keep taking vote after vote? Nothing is changing. Clearly I'm missing something here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does the Freedom Caucus hate this guy so much? He has made all the right noises for years, embraced MAGA and Trump, etc. Of course he is a phony and a fraud, but so are they. I don't really get it.
There is no way they are letting the guy promise all this stuff and then say “but you can’t fire me if I don’t do any of that”.
Anonymous wrote:Dem's are holding strong as a united front. The Republicans are just a disaster, specifically the "Freedom Caucus".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all good theater for the DC crowd, but I really don’t think the rest of America cares. If it takes a few days to pick a speaker the practical impact is negligible.
I think you're wrong. My relatives, who are all moderate/independent sometimes-voters in NC, have been texting me asking wtf is going on. The last time that happened was Jan 6th.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this works, but if Jeffries has more votes than McCarthy, why isn't he the new Speaker? Why is the GOP able to keep taking vote after vote? Nothing is changing. Clearly I'm missing something here.
Magic number is 218.
Anonymous wrote:Why does the Freedom Caucus hate this guy so much? He has made all the right noises for years, embraced MAGA and Trump, etc. Of course he is a phony and a fraud, but so are they. I don't really get it.
\Anonymous wrote:Is it just me or have there been members on the Republican side who did not show up to vote?
Anonymous wrote:This is all good theater for the DC crowd, but I really don’t think the rest of America cares. If it takes a few days to pick a speaker the practical impact is negligible.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t think people would know Pelosi was the most recent speaker?Anonymous wrote:
I don't see that happening.
I said something similar yesterday, but this is a Washington parlor game. If 60% of Americans 17 and over could name the most recent Speaker of the House I would be shocked. This matters to people who follow politics/the base of both parties. Dem voters don't want to see Hakeem Jeffries' name withdrawn or someone challenging him. What do Democrats gain by doing anything but remaining unified?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dem's are holding strong as a united front. The Republicans are just a disaster, specifically the "Freedom Caucus".
The R party let the [crazy] dogs out. Now, they can't control them. They unleashed their crazies onto this entire country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all good theater for the DC crowd, but I really don’t think the rest of America cares. If it takes a few days to pick a speaker the practical impact is negligible.
Sure. no one cares about anything, politics is all just a game. Failing to raise the debt ceiling limit was just a game, shutting the federal government for over a month was just a game, it's all just a game.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this works, but if Jeffries has more votes than McCarthy, why isn't he the new Speaker? Why is the GOP able to keep taking vote after vote? Nothing is changing. Clearly I'm missing something here.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t think people would know Pelosi was the most recent speaker?Anonymous wrote:
I don't see that happening.
I said something similar yesterday, but this is a Washington parlor game. If 60% of Americans 17 and over could name the most recent Speaker of the House I would be shocked. This matters to people who follow politics/the base of both parties. Dem voters don't want to see Hakeem Jeffries' name withdrawn or someone challenging him. What do Democrats gain by doing anything but remaining unified?