Anonymous wrote:Uggggggg. Is he trying to kill his brand? Trump back on twitter?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always wondered whether Elon Musk was sexist. He has 6 sons, including twins and triplets, so I assume there was IvF and that there was probably some sex selection involved. And then I saw this about his new two babies with Grimes.
Grimes says her daughter's life will err on the private side. "The best situation here is me training the girl and (Musk) training the boy."
Da fuk? Who “trains” their kids like a dog, let alone by gender?
Anonymous wrote:I always wondered whether Elon Musk was sexist. He has 6 sons, including twins and triplets, so I assume there was IvF and that there was probably some sex selection involved. And then I saw this about his new two babies with Grimes.
Grimes says her daughter's life will err on the private side. "The best situation here is me training the girl and (Musk) training the boy."
Trump advised Musk to purchase Twitter according to Devin “I’m Getting Out of This Cab Right Now” Nunes.
Anonymous wrote:Two record scratch noises today: shareholder lawsuit and government regulation due to all of the foreign investors Musk is taking on.
https://twitter.com/shieldhero85/status/1522663368968089602?s=21&t=iXgAwQ-xzQH6FaBepQD9ow
https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-new-twitter-funding-could-draw-tiktok-like-us-scrutiny-2022-05-06/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once again the USG needs to either seize Twitter as a public utility or at the minimum appoint an oversight board to ensure the firm does not traffic in lies or extremism.
Are you familiar with the First Amendment? The government can't censor the media, not even through a third party.
Maybe it’s time. More democratic countries in Europe protect their citizens through policing the web and other forms of media. There’s no reason why we shouldn’t move into the 21st Century.
I never thought we'd reach a point where the left seriously discusses 1A as a bad thing.
Speech has limitations.
One would think that would mean being against death threats, and allow simple statements like “only females get cervical cancer”. At Twitter, it’s the exact opposite. Death threats are permitted, and acknowledging biological reality gets accounts suspended.
That's because you don't understand the context of those discussions.
In what context is a death threat acceptable? In what context is stating only females get cervical cancer a reason to close someone’s account? Do you see how these things have a chilling effect on the idea of free speech?