Anonymous
Post 02/04/2022 10:20     Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Anonymous
Post 02/04/2022 10:20     Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Really, no Republicans have anything to say about the political nature and corruption of their disgusting judges?
Anonymous
Post 02/03/2022 16:52     Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Anonymous wrote:Not big deal, just a Supreme Court Justice speaking at a private event alongside the guy who argued the case in front of him, when they haven’t ruled yet. No reporters allowed.

Illegitimate justices, illegitimate court.

Roberts, your name is mud in the history books. Enjoy your embarrassing reputation.
Anonymous
Post 02/03/2022 16:47     Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Not big deal, just a Supreme Court Justice speaking at a private event alongside the guy who argued the case in front of him, when they haven’t ruled yet. No reporters allowed.
Anonymous
Post 12/09/2021 16:33     Subject: Re:SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Anonymous
Post 12/09/2021 15:22     Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

FYI:
Anonymous
Post 12/08/2021 15:35     Subject: SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:FFS, stop. It doesn’t matter if you call them babies or fetuses or parasites. They live inside a body that is sustaining and creating them. That body belongs to someone else who should always have the choice to stop the process. Late term abortion like never happens for convenience. It’s always so sad for everyone and a very difficult moral choice. Give birth to an person who will most likely suffer in a hospital until death or choose to prevent the suffering (many times to reduce risks to the woman carrying the pregnancy). The Catholic Church is so wrong about this.


I'm not Catholic - but hasn't the church gotten more liberal about this while American Evangelicals (and the Republican Party they hold captive) have gotten more extreme?


Nope.


Definitely not. They’re basically in lockstep. The evangelicals are the ones that talk about it the most, obviously. All the miracle baby posts on SM ans whatnot. I’ll never ever forget my evangelical friend posting daily updates about another friend’s poor poor baby that was “blessed” to live in agony for a whole month. The pictures and stories were horrible. Multiple surgeries, pain, suffering, and parents agony. So sad. And they used it as pro-life messaging. No sorry, that doesn’t work for me and my morality.

The cruelty is the point.


Do they get into Executive Heaven if they can promote more suffering? Is it a point system?


It’s a warped and outdated value system that is used to disempower individuals in service of an institution. The more you suffer the holier you are. And I believe those that promote will be judged severely in the end. My god and my Jesus don’t like causing human suffering.

+1

I’ve actually heard these dingbats use Matthew 19:14 (“suffer little children…”) as justification for why things should be miserable. Because they don’t know that the archaic use of “suffer” means “allow.”