Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
Nepotism. Just want to say, her being 24 isn't an issue. Someone with 5 years in the military may have lots of experience handling weapons and would have been perfectly qualified for the job. The issue is her lack of training and experience. Her dad obviously didn't actually train her.
I disagree on the age. There’s different levels of armourers. I guarantee her father wasn’t HEAD armourer at 24. He worked his way up with skills and experience.
A high performing soldier could be a Staff Sergeant by age 24, in charge of much more than an armorer on a movie set.
Yes after years of formal training. She had none.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
Nepotism. Just want to say, her being 24 isn't an issue. Someone with 5 years in the military may have lots of experience handling weapons and would have been perfectly qualified for the job. The issue is her lack of training and experience. Her dad obviously didn't actually train her.
I disagree on the age. There’s different levels of armourers. I guarantee her father wasn’t HEAD armourer at 24. He worked his way up with skills and experience.
A high performing soldier could be a Staff Sergeant by age 24, in charge of much more than an armorer on a movie set.
Yes after years of formal training. She had none.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
We don't really know (it could have been name recognition),but imagine how he feels today.
On some level this seems to even taint his reputation (though that is not fair).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
Nepotism. Just want to say, her being 24 isn't an issue. Someone with 5 years in the military may have lots of experience handling weapons and would have been perfectly qualified for the job. The issue is her lack of training and experience. Her dad obviously didn't actually train her.
I disagree on the age. There’s different levels of armourers. I guarantee her father wasn’t HEAD armourer at 24. He worked his way up with skills and experience.
A high performing soldier could be a Staff Sergeant by age 24, in charge of much more than an armorer on a movie set.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
Nepotism. Just want to say, her being 24 isn't an issue. Someone with 5 years in the military may have lots of experience handling weapons and would have been perfectly qualified for the job. The issue is her lack of training and experience. Her dad obviously didn't actually train her.
I disagree on the age. There’s different levels of armourers. I guarantee her father wasn’t HEAD armourer at 24. He worked his way up with skills and experience.
Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More bad news from the armourer. She had an actor new to the set firing blanks at a hill the first time they met.
“I’ve got a 6 a.m. call tomorrow to have a big shoot-out. They had me pick my gun … The armorer was like, ‘Do you have gun experience?’ I was like, ‘A little,’” Ackles told the crowd.
“She was like, ‘This is how you load it, check it’s safe. Do you want it hip-drawn or cross-drawn? I’ll just put some blanks in there and just fire a couple of rounds towards the hill.’
“I walk out and she’s like, ‘Just make sure you pull the hammer all the way back and aim at your target,’ I was like ‘All right, I got it.’”
I don't know that I see the issue here.
I'm not saying the armorer gets off, but this situation, as described, doesn't seem like a problem.
Someone who claims to have little gun experience was given a few minutes of instruction, shown how to load and check the gun one time, and then was handed a loaded gun (with blanks - although we’ve learned that blanks can kill) and then told to go practice shooting it. That seems problematic. More than one person (who knows how to check a gun) should have checked it. The use of a live gun should have been loudly announced. Gun safety should have been discussed. Anyone in the vicinity should have been behind plexiglass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
Nepotism. Just want to say, her being 24 isn't an issue. Someone with 5 years in the military may have lots of experience handling weapons and would have been perfectly qualified for the job. The issue is her lack of training and experience. Her dad obviously didn't actually train her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More bad news from the armourer. She had an actor new to the set firing blanks at a hill the first time they met.
“I’ve got a 6 a.m. call tomorrow to have a big shoot-out. They had me pick my gun … The armorer was like, ‘Do you have gun experience?’ I was like, ‘A little,’” Ackles told the crowd.
“She was like, ‘This is how you load it, check it’s safe. Do you want it hip-drawn or cross-drawn? I’ll just put some blanks in there and just fire a couple of rounds towards the hill.’
“I walk out and she’s like, ‘Just make sure you pull the hammer all the way back and aim at your target,’ I was like ‘All right, I got it.’”
I don't know that I see the issue here.
I'm not saying the armorer gets off, but this situation, as described, doesn't seem like a problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Police found a mix of LIVE AMMUNITION and blanks on set.
I just totally can’t fathom this. I’m speechless.
- member of IATSE 20 years in the business
Are you all that surprised when the head armourer is 24 and never worked professionally before? Honestly she probably didn't even know she SHOULD be securing the set ammunition.
Obviously this is a case of malpratice but I'm curious if she'll be charged with negligent homicide.
That shocks me. When I heard about that, I always assumed that it would be retired military or police instructors.
Her father had 40+ years in film production experience as a weapons expert and armourer. He got her the job.
Nepotism. Just want to say, her being 24 isn't an issue. Someone with 5 years in the military may have lots of experience handling weapons and would have been perfectly qualified for the job. The issue is her lack of training and experience. Her dad obviously didn't actually train her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More bad news from the armourer. She had an actor new to the set firing blanks at a hill the first time they met.
“I’ve got a 6 a.m. call tomorrow to have a big shoot-out. They had me pick my gun … The armorer was like, ‘Do you have gun experience?’ I was like, ‘A little,’” Ackles told the crowd.
“She was like, ‘This is how you load it, check it’s safe. Do you want it hip-drawn or cross-drawn? I’ll just put some blanks in there and just fire a couple of rounds towards the hill.’
“I walk out and she’s like, ‘Just make sure you pull the hammer all the way back and aim at your target,’ I was like ‘All right, I got it.’”
I don't know that I see the issue here.
I'm not saying the armorer gets off, but this situation, as described, doesn't seem like a problem.