Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If 1,000 FBI agents were needed to redact all mention of trump in the Epstein files then it is definitely not a nothing burger!
I think that many people were needed to read through the files (and flag/redact trump) because ir is a huge amount of information and ? someone wanted it done fast. His name could be in there 10 times or throughout, but the number of agents reading has nothing to do with that. I want to know why, after cleaning up the files so fast, they weren't released.
They have an AI for doing redaction. It shouldn't have taken 1000 agents. Something is seriously off.
It’s because the whole multi-decade sex trafficking ring is related to intelligence networks and they don’t want to risk exposing that as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Israel runs US through bribe blackmail and propaganda.
It's more obvious than ever.
They don't want Epstein Files out in public. They would lose all the pawns they hold in their hands.
Giuffere's postumous biography is keeping Epstein front and center and there is nothing Israel, Trump Johnson, Bondi can do about it. The files will be made public one way or another.
The Sword of Damocles get closer to Trump's chicken skin neck every day and the stress must be beyond our imagination.
Demolition of the White House, government shutdown, threatening a third term and still Epstein files don't move from page one. His death is the only thing that will overshadow Epstein.
Anonymous wrote:Israel runs US through bribe blackmail and propaganda.
It's more obvious than ever.
They don't want Epstein Files out in public. They would lose all the pawns they hold in their hands.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Congress wants Prince Andrew to testify but there's no way he would be stupid enough to do so. I have difficulty imagining Trump procuring girls for Andrew.
I have difficulty in imagining Trump doing anything for anyone unless it benefitted him. So if Andrew could approve a golf course development in Scotland, then I could see it. Otherwise, no.
+1Anonymous wrote:Release the GD files.
Anonymous wrote:
Congress wants Prince Andrew to testify but there's no way he would be stupid enough to do so. I have difficulty imagining Trump procuring girls for Andrew.
time to rip the band aid off. Pull people out if you have to, but stop stalling.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If 1,000 FBI agents were needed to redact all mention of trump in the Epstein files then it is definitely not a nothing burger!
I think that many people were needed to read through the files (and flag/redact trump) because ir is a huge amount of information and ? someone wanted it done fast. His name could be in there 10 times or throughout, but the number of agents reading has nothing to do with that. I want to know why, after cleaning up the files so fast, they weren't released.
They have an AI for doing redaction. It shouldn't have taken 1000 agents. Something is seriously off.
It’s because the whole multi-decade sex trafficking ring is related to intelligence networks and they don’t want to risk exposing that as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If 1,000 FBI agents were needed to redact all mention of trump in the Epstein files then it is definitely not a nothing burger!
I think that many people were needed to read through the files (and flag/redact trump) because ir is a huge amount of information and ? someone wanted it done fast. His name could be in there 10 times or throughout, but the number of agents reading has nothing to do with that. I want to know why, after cleaning up the files so fast, they weren't released.
They have an AI for doing redaction. It shouldn't have taken 1000 agents. Something is seriously off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If 1,000 FBI agents were needed to redact all mention of trump in the Epstein files then it is definitely not a nothing burger!
I think that many people were needed to read through the files (and flag/redact trump) because ir is a huge amount of information and ? someone wanted it done fast. His name could be in there 10 times or throughout, but the number of agents reading has nothing to do with that. I want to know why, after cleaning up the files so fast, they weren't released.
They have an AI for doing redaction. It shouldn't have taken 1000 agents. Something is seriously off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If 1,000 FBI agents were needed to redact all mention of trump in the Epstein files then it is definitely not a nothing burger!
I think that many people were needed to read through the files (and flag/redact trump) because ir is a huge amount of information and ? someone wanted it done fast. His name could be in there 10 times or throughout, but the number of agents reading has nothing to do with that. I want to know why, after cleaning up the files so fast, they weren't released.