Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.
How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.
Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.
If Russia already lost can we skip the next 26 billion payment? Thanks!
You mean like 'defunding the police'? You must be a MAGA (Major A$$h013 Get Away)!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.
How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.
Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.
If Russia already lost can we skip the next 26 billion payment? Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.
How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.
Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.
Not so fast - there is still plenty of mopping up to do before Europe and the World is safe for Democracy.
If Russia already lost can we skip the next 26 billion payment? Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.
How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.
Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.
Anonymous wrote:Ben Wallace with a mullet Op-Ed:
Ukraine is winning up front, you need child-soldiers or you're going to lose in the back.
"Ukraine can also play its part. The average age of the soldiers at the front is over 40. I understand President Zelensky’s desire to preserve the young for the future, but the fact is that Russia is mobilising the whole country by stealth. Putin knows a pause will hand him time to build a new army. So just as Britain did in 1939 and 1941, perhaps it is time to reassess the scale of Ukraine’s mobilisation."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/01/ben-wallace-ukraine-counteroffensive-succeeding/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Surprise! When Europeans get a chance to vote on it, they vote against the war. This isn't some watered down version either, but Fico declared at a rally last week, adding that if his party wins it “will not send a single round [of ammunition] to Ukraine.”
https://www.rt.com/news/583844-slovakia-parliamentary-elections-results/
If the Russians were really allowed to vote, they’d vote against war too. But they’re under the rule of a failed dictatorship, so we won’t get to see that vote.
Wrong
You don’t know many Russians clearly
Yes a majority would vote for a cease fire and negotiations
But giving up crimea is a non starter.
A majority of even small L liberal Russians would not vote for a government that would negotiate over crimea
Russia annexed Crimea illegally.
Legitimate countries don’t just steal parts of other countries and then declare any discussions about their illegal aggressions are off the table.
Outrageous position.
Tell me you've never read a history book without telling me you never read a history book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Surprise! When Europeans get a chance to vote on it, they vote against the war. This isn't some watered down version either, but Fico declared at a rally last week, adding that if his party wins it “will not send a single round [of ammunition] to Ukraine.”
https://www.rt.com/news/583844-slovakia-parliamentary-elections-results/
If the Russians were really allowed to vote, they’d vote against war too. But they’re under the rule of a failed dictatorship, so we won’t get to see that vote.
Wrong
You don’t know many Russians clearly
Yes a majority would vote for a cease fire and negotiations
But giving up crimea is a non starter.
A majority of even small L liberal Russians would not vote for a government that would negotiate over crimea
Russia annexed Crimea illegally.
Legitimate countries don’t just steal parts of other countries and then declare any discussions about their illegal aggressions are off the table.
Outrageous position.
Tell me you've never read a history book without telling me you never read a history book.