Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He set her up, he treated her by taking the dog via treats and calling it over. She didn't deserve to be fired for something that happened on personal time. I'm so tired of people setting people up for their 5 minutes of fame. He clearly does this regularly. She and the dog were not bothering anyone. Both handled it badly but he set her up.
You could say she set him up by walking her dog off leash in the first place.
Nobody set anybody up. This guy is a middle aged science editor who was out birdwatching. Bird people and dog people are always at odds - if she was walking a dog off leash in an area with a lot of bird watchers, she knew (or should have known) that she'd be called out by one of them. What seems unexpected to her is that the bird watcher was black.
The treat thing is weird. And I'd sure as fck be upset if someone randomly gave my dog a treat. But I wouldn't call the police and say an African American man was threatening my life over it. And I sure as hll wouldn't let myself be filmed calling the cops on a guy in this situation, using that language, knowing what could happen out of it.
There are a few people on this thread who carry treats. It's not weird and the only way a stranger could effectively give your dog a treat is if he was off leash. I don't think this applies to you.
By his own account, he used threatening language when giving the dog the treat. That would scare the bejeezus out of me. I've read enough stories of dogs poisoned by crazy neighbors and strangers that I take that seriously.
That's the only part of his side of the story that gives me pause. Obviously she is a racist lunatic who was hurting her dog in addition to putting the bird watcher's life in danger with her insane 911 call.
That's a big part of why you keep your dog on a leash. To keep your dog safe too. Responsible dog owners know this.
It would have been easy for the dog to pick up a bone that someone had thrown in the bushes, or a rat that had been poisoned and climbed into the bushes to die. She obviously is fine with taking chances on her dog eating things that can kill him. She's also fine with choking the animal herself. Why would she be scared of a dog treat?
I'm the PP you are responding to - and just to reiterate: I am not in any way defending what she did. Not at ALL. But most of us take moderated risks with our dogs - we walk them in places where they COULD pick up something bad, and we keep an eye out because we think the likelihood of them doing it and getting hurt is small. That changes when someone deliberately gives your dog something while saying, "You're not going to like this!" I hope you can see that. If not I think you are going out of your way not to recognize the very clear difference.
And again: the bird watcher was CLEARLY the victim here. The dog walker is a deranged a**hole. BUT clearly he was giving the dog the treat in a way designed to rile her up, even though in every other aspect he was 100% right and she was 100% wrong.