Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody is doubting the severity of the crime. The question is whether it's appropriate to charge 15-year-olds as adults. Some people seem to think that the size of the juvenile is a relevant factor.
+1
And they are not ashamed to say so
Some people also seem to think that juvenile detention centers are for "minor" crimes like shoplifting and vandalism.
Prosecuting children as adults is what weak, "tough on crime" prosecutors do. It appeals to the American thirst for vengeance, but is bad for recidivism, and only serves to destroy the futures of young lives. It's a punitive act taken before the youth is even found guilty. It will likely remove the opportunity of an education and mental health services from the youth ensuring that there is little hope of rehabilitation or a decent future. We just don't believe in redemption in this country.
Fortunately, there is a movement throughout the country to stop the experiment of prosecuting children as adults. The experiment has not worked. We have juvenile courts for a reason. It should be used for all juveniles, and be designed to handle all juveniles.
Totally agree. And the size of the child should not matter. We know that thought process would disproportionately affect male children of color.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody is doubting the severity of the crime. The question is whether it's appropriate to charge 15-year-olds as adults. Some people seem to think that the size of the juvenile is a relevant factor.
+1
And they are not ashamed to say so
Some people also seem to think that juvenile detention centers are for "minor" crimes like shoplifting and vandalism.
Prosecuting children as adults is what weak, "tough on crime" prosecutors do. It appeals to the American thirst for vengeance, but is bad for recidivism, and only serves to destroy the futures of young lives. It's a punitive act taken before the youth is even found guilty. It will likely remove the opportunity of an education and mental health services from the youth ensuring that there is little hope of rehabilitation or a decent future. We just don't believe in redemption in this country.
Fortunately, there is a movement throughout the country to stop the experiment of prosecuting children as adults. The experiment has not worked. We have juvenile courts for a reason. It should be used for all juveniles, and be designed to handle all juveniles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody is doubting the severity of the crime. The question is whether it's appropriate to charge 15-year-olds as adults. Some people seem to think that the size of the juvenile is a relevant factor.
+1
And they are not ashamed to say so
Some people also seem to think that juvenile detention centers are for "minor" crimes like shoplifting and vandalism.
Prosecuting children as adults is what weak, "tough on crime" prosecutors do. It appeals to the American thirst for vengeance, but is bad for recidivism, and only serves to destroy the futures of young lives. It's a punitive act taken before the youth is even found guilty. It will likely remove the opportunity of an education and mental health services from the youth ensuring that there is little hope of rehabilitation or a decent future. We just don't believe in redemption in this country.
Fortunately, there is a movement throughout the country to stop the experiment of prosecuting children as adults. The experiment has not worked. We have juvenile courts for a reason. It should be used for all juveniles, and be designed to handle all juveniles.
The court document a PP linked above clearly states that the nature of the crime is a factor determining whether they should be moved to criminal court.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody is doubting the severity of the crime. The question is whether it's appropriate to charge 15-year-olds as adults. Some people seem to think that the size of the juvenile is a relevant factor.
+1
And they are not ashamed to say so
Some people also seem to think that juvenile detention centers are for "minor" crimes like shoplifting and vandalism.
Prosecuting children as adults is what weak, "tough on crime" prosecutors do. It appeals to the American thirst for vengeance, but is bad for recidivism, and only serves to destroy the futures of young lives. It's a punitive act taken before the youth is even found guilty. It will likely remove the opportunity of an education and mental health services from the youth ensuring that there is little hope of rehabilitation or a decent future. We just don't believe in redemption in this country.
Fortunately, there is a movement throughout the country to stop the experiment of prosecuting children as adults. The experiment has not worked. We have juvenile courts for a reason. It should be used for all juveniles, and be designed to handle all juveniles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody is doubting the severity of the crime. The question is whether it's appropriate to charge 15-year-olds as adults. Some people seem to think that the size of the juvenile is a relevant factor.
+1
And they are not ashamed to say so
Some people also seem to think that juvenile detention centers are for "minor" crimes like shoplifting and vandalism.
Prosecuting children as adults is what weak, "tough on crime" prosecutors do. It appeals to the American thirst for vengeance, but is bad for recidivism, and only serves to destroy the futures of young lives. It's a punitive act taken before the youth is even found guilty. It will likely remove the opportunity of an education and mental health services from the youth ensuring that there is little hope of rehabilitation or a decent future. We just don't believe in redemption in this country.
Fortunately, there is a movement throughout the country to stop the experiment of prosecuting children as adults. The experiment has not worked. We have juvenile courts for a reason. It should be used for all juveniles, and be designed to handle all juveniles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody is doubting the severity of the crime. The question is whether it's appropriate to charge 15-year-olds as adults. Some people seem to think that the size of the juvenile is a relevant factor.
+1
And they are not ashamed to say so
Anonymous wrote:I think MCPS was hoping for the students to be prosecuted in the juvenile system. MCPS loves to hide their dirty laundry behind laws that prevent details from coming out to the public. The superintendent actually got pissy in the news conference last week when a news reporter asked a question based off knowledge gained from the "leaked" police report. Leaked or not, the police report is normally considered a pretty credible source for information as to what happened.
Now at least the record of won't be sealed since the boys are being tried as adults. If MCPS was smart, they would have a community meeting to give information to parents. If nothing else, MCPS should have a community meeting with the parents who have had (past and present) children on the JV football team. They could welcome in the police to talk if MCPS is actually afraid of disclosing something the police doesn't want out till the case is closed.
Anonymous wrote:How does the size of the person relate to what the punishment should be?
Are we supposed to hate tall people, if so, then the short people are awful for thinking that
Anonymous wrote:Nobody is doubting the severity of the crime. The question is whether it's appropriate to charge 15-year-olds as adults. Some people seem to think that the size of the juvenile is a relevant factor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The juvenile Justice system is meant for crimes like shoplifting, or vandalism, not major crimes like 1st degree rape. This is a horrific crime, and deserves to be treated as such by the justice system. Think of the VICTIMS and their pain and suffering.
No, the juvenile justice system is meant for crimes committed by juveniles.
Anonymous wrote:
The juvenile Justice system is meant for crimes like shoplifting, or vandalism, not major crimes like 1st degree rape. This is a horrific crime, and deserves to be treated as such by the justice system. Think of the VICTIMS and their pain and suffering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the football websites, it looks like he is a 9th grader. And 6’ 229 lbs.
Probably a 15yr old 9th grader at a 3rd grade reading level. Half these people who commit these stupid acts that even an 8yr old knows is wrong are actual real like half wits.
However charging a 15yr old as an adult for a crime that will effectively ruin their entire lives. This wont be a burglary charge. This is a sex crime and will severely limit their job opportunities. You charge these boys as adults and guess what will happen?? That ugly adult prison system we have will rip those boys to shreads and they will be in and out of that system for life. You people just don't how incredibly destructive these charges are on all of society. We are spectacularly dum in this country and always so confused why we have such high crime. Hmmm put a young man in a brutal prison for a few years and release him to society. Yea, that works well.![]()
Or you put a giant, violent, man sized rapist in juvenile with a bunch of 13 year old shoplifters and vandals. That young man is a risk to all of the kids in detention.