Where was all this SN speculation about Kate's recent pregnancy? After all she's just 5 months younger than Meghan. Does Prince Louis have special needs? Maybe that's the reason he hasn't been seen as much as George and Charlotte were at his age.

Does that sound ridiculous? Yes of course it does and so does all of this nasty speculation in regards to MM's baby. Some of you truly need help.

This IS like a bad game of telephone.

And the twins spec has carried on too long.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where the idea Markle had to resort to ART even came from. I guess there will be much gnashing of teeth when the twins turn out OMg cuteness. Also how horrible to wish special needs on unborn babies.

If she did not have IVF, then she is not having twins.

Twins do not run in either her or Harry's families.

You can't have it both ways.

My MIL didn’t do IVF (didn’t exist back then), and yet DH and his brother are fraternal twins. No history of twins in either MIL’s or FIL’s families. It happens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where the idea Markle had to resort to ART even came from. I guess there will be much gnashing of teeth when the twins turn out OMg cuteness. Also how horrible to wish special needs on unborn babies.

If she did not have IVF, then she is not having twins.

Twins do not run in either her or Harry's families.

You can't have it both ways.

Not so! I am the mom of twins 2-3 posts above. AMA women often have fraternal twins conceived naturally without AR— mine were! Both healthy, born at 36 weeks.

Especially if she went on a low dose of clomid to increase her odds of conceiving quickly.

And clomid was linked to defects, fwiw.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where the idea Markle had to resort to ART even came from. I guess there will be much gnashing of teeth when the twins turn out OMg cuteness. Also how horrible to wish special needs on unborn babies.

If she did not have IVF, then she is not having twins.

Twins do not run in either her or Harry's families.

You can't have it both ways.

Not so! I am the mom of twins 2-3 posts above. AMA women often have fraternal twins conceived naturally without AR— mine were! Both healthy, born at 36 weeks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Media reports are saying she is considering a home birth. I Doubt that option would be floated if she were having twins.

I also had twins (I was 35, so AMA). No way would I consider a home birth.

She isn't having twins.

And if she opts for a home birth, then that confirms my suspicions that she is a super type A, know-it-all control freak. I suspect that's what Harry likes a lot her, but I also suspect that's what rubs W+K the wrong way.

If anything this proves the media knows nothing and is desperate for more Sussex information. A home birth? LOL

If she was having twins, she would not even consider a home birth.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where the idea Markle had to resort to ART even came from. I guess there will be much gnashing of teeth when the twins turn out OMg cuteness. Also how horrible to wish special needs on unborn babies.

If she did not have IVF, then she is not having twins.

Twins do not run in either her or Harry's families.

You can't have it both ways.

Anonymous wrote:Media reports are saying she is considering a home birth. I Doubt that option would be floated if she were having twins.

I also had twins (I was 35, so AMA). No way would I consider a home birth.

She isn't having twins.

And if she opts for a home birth, then that confirms my suspicions that she is a super type A, know-it-all control freak. I suspect that's what Harry likes a lot her, but I also suspect that's what rubs W+K the wrong way.

Media reports are saying she is considering a home birth. I Doubt that option would be floated if she were having twins.

I also had twins (I was 35, so AMA). No way would I consider a home birth.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where the idea Markle had to resort to ART even came from. I guess there will be much gnashing of teeth when the twins turn out OMg cuteness. Also how horrible to wish special needs on unborn babies.

Oy vey, pp! Nobody "wished" special needs upon them. Rather, school choices will ultimately depend on the kid's abilities and needs.

There are some delusional people here who seem to believe H+M will deviate from his very traditional elite and private upbringing and act like a bunch of kardashian-publicity-seekers...like common celebs. That's not going to happen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:H+M's kids will go wherever William's kids go. Harry isn't raising second-class royals.

Having said that, everything depends on whether the kids have SNs. M used fertility treatments, right?

Based off her age and how quickly she got pregnant after her wedding, that is definitely a possibility.

I hate to say it, and I don't know if stats back it up, but of all the twins I know conceived using AR, at least one twin has some health and development issues. I would be very scared to be carrying twins. Whatever the case is for her, hopefully she has a healthy pregnancy. But I wouldn't be cracking open the champagne eagerly awaiting all the OMG twin cuteness.

Except you're assuming she used ancillary conception methods when shocker - she was just fertile. Wow, what a blessing.

She didn't need to go to a clinic on her honeymoon and that bothers so many people for some reason.

Uh.... calm down. IF she used AR and I don't know/don't care if she did they maybe there might be other complications. Otherwise twin pregnancies are considered high risk even without AR. There's nothing new about that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:H+M's kids will go wherever William's kids go. Harry isn't raising second-class royals.

Having said that, everything depends on whether the kids have SNs. M used fertility treatments, right?

Based off her age and how quickly she got pregnant after her wedding, that is definitely a possibility.

I hate to say it, and I don't know if stats back it up, but of all the twins I know conceived using AR, at least one twin has some health and development issues. I would be very scared to be carrying twins. Whatever the case is for her, hopefully she has a healthy pregnancy. But I wouldn't be cracking open the champagne eagerly awaiting all the OMG twin cuteness.

Except you're assuming she used ancillary conception methods when shocker - she was just fertile. Wow, what a blessing.

She didn't need to go to a clinic on her honeymoon and that bothers so many people for some reason.

There were media reports that she sought fertility treatment prior to her wedding. Google it.

I don’t know where the idea Markle had to resort to ART even came from. I guess there will be much gnashing of teeth when the twins turn out OMg cuteness. Also how horrible to wish special needs on unborn babies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:H+M's kids will go wherever William's kids go. Harry isn't raising second-class royals.

Having said that, everything depends on whether the kids have SNs. M used fertility treatments, right?

Based off her age and how quickly she got pregnant after her wedding, that is definitely a possibility.

I hate to say it, and I don't know if stats back it up, but of all the twins I know conceived using AR, at least one twin has some health and development issues. I would be very scared to be carrying twins. Whatever the case is for her, hopefully she has a healthy pregnancy. But I wouldn't be cracking open the champagne eagerly awaiting all the OMG twin cuteness.

Except you're assuming she used ancillary conception methods when shocker - she was just fertile. Wow, what a blessing.

She didn't need to go to a clinic on her honeymoon and that bothers so many people for some reason.