Anonymous wrote:If that Op-Ed writer ever did manage to get by regular US domestic surveillance when they gave the NYT their op-ed and got away clean, but foreign intelligence picked up who he/she was, he/she would be subject to blackmail and extortion. And given he/she is already working against the President, there is no telling what he/she might be willing to do to save themselves. If I were Secret Service, I would be investigating because this leaker is a direct threat to the safety of the President.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If that Op-Ed writer ever did manage to get by regular US domestic surveillance when they gave the NYT their op-ed and got away clean, but foreign intelligence picked up who he/she was, he/she would be subject to blackmail and extortion. And given he/she is already working against the President, there is no telling what he/she might be willing to do to save themselves. If I were Secret Service, I would be investigating because this leaker is a direct threat to the safety of the President.
Meh, this is basically a moot point:
Not really, that person can be compromised themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If that Op-Ed writer ever did manage to get by regular US domestic surveillance when they gave the NYT their op-ed and got away clean, but foreign intelligence picked up who he/she was, he/she would be subject to blackmail and extortion. And given he/she is already working against the President, there is no telling what he/she might be willing to do to save themselves. If I were Secret Service, I would be investigating because this leaker is a direct threat to the safety of the President.
Meh, this is basically a moot point:
Anonymous wrote:If that Op-Ed writer ever did manage to get by regular US domestic surveillance when they gave the NYT their op-ed and got away clean, but foreign intelligence picked up who he/she was, he/she would be subject to blackmail and extortion. And given he/she is already working against the President, there is no telling what he/she might be willing to do to save themselves. If I were Secret Service, I would be investigating because this leaker is a direct threat to the safety of the President.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The GOP is turning on him because only a small portion of the population supports him. They are going to lose the mid-terms. They only back Trump when it’s in the own interest. The GOP will back a traitor.
They got their massive, irresponsible tax cut for the rich and their regressive justices, they don't need Donny Smallhands anymore.
That plus there's a rumor he's not going to run in 2020. If he's a lame duck, why bother cozying up to him anymore.
Anonymous wrote:I’m no HR professional but it’s prob a bad sign when an employee writes an anonymous letter calling you a brain-dead asshole and you can’t even narrow it down to 100 people
https://twitter.com/TheDweck/status/1037732736453070850
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The GOP is turning on him because only a small portion of the population supports him. They are going to lose the mid-terms. They only back Trump when it’s in the own interest. The GOP will back a traitor.
They got their massive, irresponsible tax cut for the rich and their regressive justices, they don't need Donny Smallhands anymore.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that no one can figure out who it is simply because there are too many plausible options to choose from should terrify anyone who wasn't already scared spitless by this president.
Anonymous wrote:The GOP is turning on him because only a small portion of the population supports him. They are going to lose the mid-terms. They only back Trump when it’s in the own interest. The GOP will back a traitor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m no HR professional but it’s prob a bad sign when an employee writes an anonymous letter calling you a brain-dead asshole and you can’t even narrow it down to 100 people
https://twitter.com/TheDweck/status/1037732736453070850
We have a winner, people!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()